School practitioners for a variety of reasons have not im plemented research findings to any great advantage. The authors explore how to turn the situation around and achieve effec tiveness in the process.
References
1.
Chall, J. "Restoring Dignity and Self-Worth to the Teacher." In Kaleidoscope: Readings in Education, edited by K. Ryan and J.M. Cooper.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1980 .
2.
Ducharme, E.R. "When Dogs Sing: The Prospect for Change in American High School." The Journal of Teacher Education, February 1982.
3.
Goodlad, J.I.Behind the Classroom Door. Worthington, Ohio: C.A. Jones Publishing Co., 1970.
4.
Huling, L.L.; Trang, M.; and Correll, L. "Interactive Research and Development: A Promising Strategy for Teacher Educators." The Journal of Teacher Education, December 1981.
5.
Odell, L. "The Classroom Teacher as Researcher." English Journal65 (1976): 106-111.
6.
Pine, G.J. "Collaborative Action Research: Teacher Emancipation." New England Teacher Corps Exchange2 ( 1979): 3-4.
7.
Rainey, B.G. "Action Research: A Valuable Professional Activity for the Teacher ." Clearing House47 ( 1973): 371-375.
Shalaway, L., and Lanier, J. "Teachers Collaborate in Research." New England Teacher Corps Exchange2 (1979): 1-2.
10.
Tikunoff, W.; Ward, B.; and Griffin, G.Interactive Research and Development on Teaching. Final Report. San Francisco, Calif.: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1979.
