Anderson, R.B. (1977) "The effectiveness of Follow Through: evidence from the national analysis." Curriculum Inquiry7, 3: 209-226.
2.
Anderson, R.B., R.G. St. Pierre., E.C. Proper, and L.B. Stebbins (1978) "Pardon us, but what was the question again?: a response to the critique of the Follow Through evaluation." Harvard Educational Rev.48, 2: 161-170.
3.
Bereiter, C. and M. Kurland (1978) "Were some Follow Through models more effective than others?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario.
4.
Camilli, G. (1979) "A reanalysis of the effect of Follow Through on cognitive and effective development." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado.
5.
Feinberg, L. (1977) "'Basic' teaching methods more effective, study says." Washington Post (June 20): 1.
6.
Haney, W. (1977) A Technical History of the National Follow Through Evaluation. Report to the U.S. Office of Education [Contract No. OEC-0-74-0394] . Cambridge, MA: Huron Institute .
7.
House, E.R., G.V. Glass, L.D. McLean, and D.F. Walker (1978) "No simple answer: critique of the Follow Through evaluation." Harvard Educational Rev.48 (May): 128-160.
8.
Kennedy, M.M. (1978) "Findings from the Follow Through planned variation study " Educational Researcher7 (June): 3-11.
9.
Kilpatrick, J.J. (1977) "Basics better in education, Cambridge group finds ." Boston Evening Globe (July 1): 19.
10.
L, K. ( 1977) "More high marks for the 3 r's: basic skills found lagging in 'open' classrooms." National Observer (July 4): 6.
11.
Proper, E.C., R.G. St.Pierre, and T.R. Cerva (1977) Education as Experimentation : A Planned Variation Model, Volume IV-E, Supplementary analyses: Reanalysis of Selected Data Sets. Report to the U.S. Office of Education [Contract No. 300-75-0134]. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
12.
Rogers, D., D. Flynn, M. Errecart, and J. Hoff (1977) A Cost Analysis of Follow Through Projects. Report prepared for the U.S. Office of Education. Mountain View, CA: RMC Research Corporation.
13.
Stebbins, L.B., R.G. St.Pierre, E.C. Proper, R.B. Anderson, and T.R. Cerva (1978) "An evaluation of Follow Through," pp. 571-670 in T. Cook (ed.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Volume III . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
— ( 1977) Education as Experimentation: A Planned Variation Model, Volume IV-A: An Evaluation of Follow Through. Report to the U.S. Office of Education [Contract No. 300-75-0134]. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
15.
Stebbins, L.B. et al. (1976) Education as Experimentation: A Planned Variation Model, Volume III-A, Findings: Cohort II, Interim Findings: Cohort III. Report to the U.S. Office of Education [Contract No. 300-75-0134]. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates Inc.
16.
Wisler, C.E., G.P. Burns, and D. Iwamoto (1978) "Follow through redux: a response to the critique by House, Glass, McLean, and Walker." Harvard Educational Rev.48 (May): 171-185.