A detailed report is presented on the performance of the postimplantation rat whole-embryo culture (WEC) test in a European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-sponsored formal validation study on three in vitro tests for embryotoxicity. Twenty coded test chemicals, classified as non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic or strongly embryotoxic on the basis of their in vivo effects in animals and/or humans, were tested in four laboratories. The outcome showed that the WEC test can be considered to be a scientifically validated test, which is ready for consideration for use in assessing the embryotoxic potentials of chemicals for regulatory purposes.
GenschowE., SpielmannH., ScholzG., SeilerA., BrownN., PiersmaA., BradyM., ClemannN., HuuskonenH., PaillardF., BremerS., & BeckerK. (2002). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests: results of the definitive phase and evaluation of prediction models. ATLA30, 151–176.
2.
NewD.A.T. (1978). Whole embryo culture and the study of mammalian embryos during organogenesis. Biology Reviews53, 81–122.
3.
BrownN.A., & FabroS. (1981). Quantitation of rat embryonic development in vitro: a morphological scoring system. Teratology24, 65–78.
4.
BechterR., & SchmidB.P. (1987). Teratogenicity in vitro: a comparative study of four antimycotic drugs using the whole embryo culture system. Toxicology in Vitro1, 11–15.
5.
PiersmaA.H., BechterR., KrafftN., SchmidB.P., StadlerJ., VerhoefA., VerseilC., & ZijlstraJ. (1996). An interlaboratory evaluation of five pairs of teratogens and non-teratogens in post-implantation rat embryo culture. ATLA24, 201–209.
6.
BallsM., BlaauboerB.J., FentemJ.H., BrunerL., CombesR.D., EkwallB., FielderR.J., GuillouzoA., LewisR.W., LovellD.P., ReinhardtC.A., RepettoG., SladowskiD., SpielmannH., & ZuccoF. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5. ATLA23, 129–147.
7.
OECD (1996). Final Report of the OECD Workshop on Harmonisation of Validation and Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Toxicological Tests Methods, 60 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
8.
CurrenR.D., SoutheeJ.A., SpielmannH., LiebschM., FentemJ.H., & BallsM. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ATLA23, 211–217.
9.
HolzhütterH-G., ArcherG., DamiN., LovellD.P., SaltelliA., & SjöströmM. (1996). Recommendations for the application of biostatistical methods during the development and validation of alternative toxicological methods. ECVAM Biostatistics Task Force report 1. ATLA24, 511–530.
10.
BrownN.A. (2002). Selection of test chemicals for the ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests. ATLA30, 177–198.
11.
GenschowE., ScholzG., BrownN., PiersmaA., BradyM., ClemannN., HuuskonenH., PaillardF., BremerS., BeckerK., & SpielmannH. (2000). Development of prediction models for three in vitro embryotoxicity tests in an ECVAM validation study. In Vitro and Molecular Toxicology13, 51–66.
12.
Anon. (1999). INVITTOX Protocol 123. Embryotoxicity Testing in Postimplantation Rat Whole-embryo Culture: Method of Piersma. Website http://ecvam-sis.jrc.it (Accessed 22.9.04).
13.
Anon. (1990). DIN ISO 5725-2. Accuracy Trueness and Precision of Measurement Methods and Results: A Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method, 73 pp. Berlin, Germany: Boldt Verlag.
14.
NorušisM.J. (1994). SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1, 385 pp. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS.
15.
BackhausK., ErichsonB., PlinkeW., & WeiberR. (1996). Multivariate Analysemethoden, 8th edn, 591 pp. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer Verlag.
16.
BortzJ. (1993). Statistik, 3rd edn, 753 pp. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer Verlag.
17.
GenschowE., SpielmannH., ScholzG., PohlI., SeilerA., ClemannN., BremerS., & BeckerK. (2004). Validation of the embryonic stem cell test in the international ECVAM validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests. ATLA32, 209–244.
18.
BechterR., & TerlouwG.D.C. (1993). Strain differences in the control incidences of morphological abnormalities in the rat whole embryo culture. Toxicology in Vitro7, 281–284.
19.
OglesbyL.A., EbronM.T., BeyerP.E., CarverB.D., & KavlockR.J. (1986). Coculture of rat embryos and hepatocytes: in vitro detection of a proteratogen. Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis6, 129–138.
20.
PiersmaA.H., van AertsL.A.G.J.M., VerhoefA., Garbis-BerkvensJ.M., RobinsonJ.E., Peereboom-StegemanJ.H.J., & PetersP.W.J. (1991). Biotransformation of cyclophosphamide in post-implantation rat embryo culture using maternal hepatocytes in co-culture. Pharmacology and Toxicology69, 47–51.
21.
ESAC (2002). The use of scientifically validated in vitro tests for embryotoxicity. ATLA30, 265–273.
