Animal Use Statistics: The New Zealand and Australian Experience and Perspective

Abstract

Both New Zealand and Australia have established systems for the collection, collation, analysis and publication of animal use statistics. In New Zealand, the collection of national data was first mandated in 1987, and has been continued by regulations made under the recently introduced Animal Welfare Act 1999. Initially, the information collected in New Zealand was of a very general nature. During the early 1990s, the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (NAEAC) played a key role, working with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), to revise the information required to ensure that it was more meaningful and informative. This process of revision and refinement has been ongoing, with an independent research report being commissioned on behalf on both MAF and NAEAC in 2000. A number of specific issues currently receiving attention are referred to in this paper, along with more general issues arising from moving to more informative and transparent systems. The value of animal use statistics was addressed by a Senate Select Committee in Australia in 1989, when it was recommended that a summary of the animals used in teaching and research in each State and Territory be collated on a national basis. An initiative has been taken to achieve this objective, although delays have resulted from a number of legal, policy and logistical issues.

Keywords

animal research animal use statistics Australia New Zealand Three Rs

References

Russell

W.M.S.

, & Burch

R.L.

(1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, reprinted edition 238 pp. London, UK: UFAW, 1992 (can also be found at http://altweb.jhsph.edu/publications/humane_exp/het-toc.htm).

Bayvel

A.C.D.

(2000). The New Zealand regulatory approach to the use of live animals in research, testing or teaching. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. Balls

, van Zeller

A-M.

, & Halder

M.E.

), pp. 1023–1031. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

Mellor

D.J.

(1999). The new Animal Welfare Act 1999 and conducting animal-based science in New Zealand. ANZCCART News 12, 6.

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2000). Users Guide to Part 6 of the Animal Welfare Act 1999 58 pp. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee (2002). 2001 Annual Report, 30 pp. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

Orlans

F.B.

(2000). Practical applications of animal harm scales: international perspectives. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. Balls

, van Zeller

A-M.

, & Halder

M.E.

), pp. 1049–1056. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

Purves

K.E.

(2000). Global harmonisation of pain and distress classification systems: current analysis and opportunity for change. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. Balls

, van Zeller

A-M.

, & Halder

M.E.

), pp. 1057–1067. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

Edwards

(2001). Animal research in Australia — the numbers are still increasing. For Animals Today 9, 1–2.

National Health and Medical Research Council (1997). Australian Code of Practice For The Care And Use Of Animals For Scientific Purposes, 82 pp. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.

10.

Australian Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare (1989). Animal Experimentation, 291 pp. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.

11.

Kelly

(1997). The national statistics package — background and progress. ANZCCART News 10, 1.

12.

Rose

(1994). Statistics — are expectations too great? ANZCCART News 7, 1–2.