Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME recently conducted a research project sponsored by Defra on the status of alternatives to animal testing with regard to the European Union REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) system for safety testing and risk assessment of chemicals. The project covered all the main toxicity endpoints associated with the REACH system. This paper focuses on the prospects for using alternative methods (both in vitro and in silico) for environmental (aquatic) toxicity testing. The manuscript reviews tests based on fish cells and cell lines, fish embryos, lower organisms, and the many expert systems and QSARs for aquatic toxicity testing. Ways in which reduction and refinement measures can be used are also discussed, including the Upper Threshold Concentration — Step Down (UTC) approach, which has recently been retrospectively validated by ECVAM and subsequently endorsed by the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC). It is hoped that the application of this approach could reduce the number of fish used in acute toxicity studies by around 65–70%. Decision-tree style integrated testing strategies are also proposed for acute aquatic toxicity and chronic toxicity (including bioaccumulation), followed by a number of recommendations for the future facilitation of aquatic toxicity testing with respect to environmental risk assessment.
GrindonC., CombesR., CroninM.T.D., RobertsD.W., & GarrodJ. (2006). A review of the status of alternative approaches to animal testing and the development of integrated testing strategies for assessing the toxicity of chemicals under REACH – A summary of a DEFRA-funded project conducted by Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME. ATLA34, Suppl. 1, 149–158.
ECETOC (2004). Workshop on Alternative Testing Approaches in Environmental Risk Assessment. Workshop Report 5, 31 pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.
7.
NagelR. (2002). DarT: The embryo test with the Zebrafish, Danio rerio — a general model in ecotoxicology and toxicology. ALTEX19, Suppl. 1, 38–48.
8.
BraubeckT., BottcherM., HollertH., KosmehlT., LammerE., LeistE., RudolfM., & SeitzN. (2005). Towards an alternative for the acute fish LC50 test in chemical assessment: The fish embryo toxicity test goes multi-species — an update. ALTEX22, 87–102.
9.
CastañoA., BolsN., BraunbeckT., DierickxP., HalderM., IsomaaB., KawaharaK., LeeL.E.J., MothersillC., PärtP., RepettoG., Riego SintesJ., RufliH., SmithR., WoodC., & SegnerH. (2003). The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 47. ATLA31, 317–351.
10.
PärtP., NorrgrenL., BergströmE., & SjöbergP. (1993). Primary cultures of epithelial cells from rainbow trout gills. Journal of Experimental Biology175, 219–232.
11.
BraunbeckT., & SegnerH. (2000). Isolation and cultivation of teleost hepatocytes. In The Hepatocyte Review (ed. BerryM.N., & EdwardsA.M.), pp. 49–72. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
SaitoH., IwamiS., & ShigeokaT. (1991). In vitro cytotoxicity of 45 pesticides to goldfish GF-Scale (GFS) cells. Chemosphere23, 525–537.
14.
CastañoA., CantarinoM.J., CastilloP., & TarazonaJ.V. (1996). Correlations between the RTG-2 cytotoxicity test and in vivo LC50 rainbow trout bioassay. Chemosphere32, 2141–2157.
15.
BolsN.C., BoliskaS.A., DixonD.G., HodsonP.V., & KaiserK.L.E. (1985). The use of fish cell cultures as an indication of contaminant toxicity to fish. Aquatic Toxicology6, 147–155.
16.
SegnerH., & LenzD. (1993). Cytotoxicity assays with the rainbow trout R1 cell line. Toxicology in Vitro7, 537–540.
17.
GüldenM., & SeibertH. (2005). Impact of bioavailability on the correlation between in vitro cytotoxic and in vivo acute fish toxic concentrations of chemicals. Aquatic Toxicology72, 327–337.
18.
CastañoA., & Gómez-LechónM.J. (2005). Comparison of basal cytotoxicity data between mammalian and fish cell lines: A literature survey. Toxicology in Vitro19, 695–705.
19.
GüldenM., MorchelS., & SeibertH. (2005). Comparison of mammalian and fish cells line cytotoxicity: impact of endpoint and exposure duration. Aquatic Toxicology71, 229–236.
20.
PrietoP., BairdA.W., BlaauboerB.J., Castell RipollJ.V., CorviR., DekantW., DietlP., GennariG., GribaldoL., GriffinJ.L., HartungT., HeindelJ.J., HoetP., JenningsP., MarocchioL., NorabergJ., PazosP., WestmorelandC., WolfA., WrightJ., & PfallerW. (2006). The assessment of repeated dose toxicity in vitro: A proposed approach. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 56. ATLA34, 315–341.
21.
MothersillC., LyngF., LyonsM., & CottellD. (1995). Growth and differentiation of epidermal cells of the rainbow trout established as explants and maintained in various media. Journal of Fish Biology46, 1011–1025.
22.
CombesR.D. (2000). Endocrine disruptors: A critical review of in vitro and in vivo testing strategies for assessing their toxic hazard to humans. ATLA28, 81–118.
23.
OECD (2004). Detailed Review Paper on Fish Screening Assays for the Detection of Endocrine Active Substances. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 47, 170 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
24.
OECD (2004). Detailed Review Paper on Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay for the Detection of Thyroid Active Substances. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Number 46, 106 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
25.
AnkleyG.T., & JohnsonR.D. (2004). Small fish models for identifying and assessing the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. ILAR Journal45, 469–483.
26.
ThorpeK.L., HutchinsonT.H., HetheridgeM.J., SumpterJ.P., & TylerC.R. (2000). Development of an in vivo screening assay for estrogenic chemicals using juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry19, 2812–2820.
27.
KramerV.J., Miles-RichardsonS., PierensS.L., & GiesyJ.P. (1998). Reproductive impairment and induction of alkaline-labile phosphate, a biomarker of estrogen exposure, in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to waterborne 17β-estradiol. Aquatic Toxicology40, 335–360.
28.
YadetieF., ArukweA., GoksoyrA., & MaleR. (1999). Induction of hepatic estrogen receptor in juvenile Atlantic salmon in vivo by the environmental estrogen, 4-nonylphenol. Science of the Total Environment233, 201–210.
29.
ChristiansenL.B., PedersenK.L., PedersenS.N., KorsgaardB., & BjerregaardP. (2000). In vivo comparison of xenoestrogens using rainbow trout vitellogenin induction as a screening system. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry19, 1867–1874.
30.
TylerC.R., van AerleR., HutchinsonT.H., MaddixS., & TripH. (1999). An in vivo testing system for endocrine disruptors in fish early life stages using induction of vitellogenin. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry18, 337–347.
31.
SumpterJ.P., & JoblingS. (1995). Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for estrogenic contamination of the aquatic environment. Environmental Health Perspectives103, 173–178.
32.
JoblingS., & SumpterJ.P. (1993). Detergent components in sewage effluent are weakly oestrogenic to fish: An in vitro study using rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hepatocytes. Aquatic Toxicity27, 361–372.
33.
PelisseroC., FlouriotG., FoucherJ.L., BennetauB., DunoguesJ., Le GacF., & SumpterJ.P. (1993). Vitellogenin synthesis in cultured hepatocytes – an in vitro test for the estrogenic potency of chemicals. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology44, 263–272.
34.
SmeetsJ.M.W., Rouhani RankouhiT., NicholsK.M., KomenH., KaminskiN.E., GiesyJ.P., & van den BergM. (1999). In vitro vitellogenin production by carp (Cyprinus carpio) hepatocytes as a screening method for determining (anti)estrogenic activity of xenobiotics. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology157, 68–76.
35.
GagnéF., & BlaiseC. (2000). Evaluation of environmental estrogens with a fish cell line. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology65, 494–500.
36.
MaitreJ.L., ValotaireY., & Guguen-GuillouzoC. (1986). Estradiol-17β stimulation of vitellogenin synthesis in primary culture of male rainbow trout hepatocytes. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology22, 337–343.
37.
ZacharewskiT. (1997). In Vitro bioassays for assessing estrogenic substances. Environmental Science and Technology31, 613–623.
38.
MaoC.J., & ShapiroD.J. (2000). A histone deacetylase inhibitor potentiates estrogen receptor activation of a stably integrated vitellogenin promoter in HepG2 cells. Endocrinology141, 2361–2369.
39.
MackayD., & FraserA. (2000). Bioaccumulation of persistent organic chemicals: mechanisms and models. Environmental Pollution110, 375–391.
40.
MeylanW.M., HowardP.H., BoethlingR.S., AronsonD., PrintupH., & GouchieS. (1999). Improved method for estimating bioconcentration/bioaccumulation factor from octanol/water partition coefficient. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry18, 664–672.
41.
Bermúdez-SaldañaJ.M., Escuder-GilabertL., Medina-HernándezM.J., Villanueva-CamañasR.M., & SagradoS. (2005). Modelling bioconcentration of pesticides in fish using biopartitioning micellar chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A1063, 153–160.
42.
LeeL.E.J., ClemonsJ.H., BechtelD.G., CaldwellS.J., HanK-B., Pasitschniak-ArtsM., MosserD.D., & BolsN.C. (1993). Development and characterization of a rainbow trout liver cell line expressing cytochrome P450-dependent mono-oxygenase activity. Cell Biology and Toxicology9, 279–294.
43.
FletcherM., KellyS., PärtP., O'DonnellM.J., & WoodC.M. (2000). Transport properties of cultured branchial epithelia from freshwater rainbow trout: a novel preparation with mitochondria-rich cells. Journal of Experimental Biology203, 1523–1537.
44.
KellyS.P., FletcherM., PärtP., & WoodC.M. (2000). Procedures for the preparation and culture of “reconstructed” rainbow trout branchial epithelia. Methods in Cell Science22, 153–163.
45.
CroninM.T.D. (2003). Quantitative structure– activity relationships for acute aquatic toxicity: the role of mechanism of toxic action in successful modeling. In Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models of mutagens and carcinogens (ed. BenigniR.), pp. 235–258. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
46.
CroninM.T.D., AptulaA.O., DuffyJ.C., NetzevaT.I., RoweP.H., ValkovaI.V., & SchultzT.W. (2002). Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.Chemosphere4, 1201–1221.
47.
PavanM., NetzevaT.I., & WorthA.P. (2006). Validation of a QSAR model for acute toxicity. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research17, 147–171.
48.
LessigiarskaI., WorthA.P., Sokull-KluttgenB., JeramS., DeardenJ.C., NetzevaT.I., & CroninM.T.D. (2004). QSAR investigation of a large dataset for fish, algae and daphnia toxicity. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research15, 413–431.
49.
KlopmanG., SaiakhovR., RosenkranzH.S., & HermensJ.L.M. (1999). Multiple computer-automated structure evaluation program study of aquatic toxicity 1: Guppy. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry18, 2497–2505.
50.
RussomC.L., BradburyS.P., BroderiusS.J., HammermeisterD.E., & DrummondR.A. (1997). Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry16, 948–967.
Anon. (2006). The MultiCASE expert system. Website http://www.multicase.com (Accessed 13.06.06).
55.
Anon. (2006). The OASIS suite of programs. Website http://omega.btu.bg/ (Accessed 13.06.06).
56.
Anon. (2006). The TerraQSAR expert system — one of the TerraBase programs. Website http://www.terrabase-inc.com (Accessed 13.06.06).
57.
MooreD.R.J., BretonR.L., & MacDonaldD.B. (2003). A comparison of model performance for six qualitative structure-activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry22, 1799–1809.
58.
DyerS.D., StantonD.T., LauthJ.R., & CherryD.S. (2000). Structure activity relationships for acute and chronic toxicity of alcohol ether sulfates. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry19, 608–616.
59.
VersteegD.J., StantonD.T., PenceM.A., & CowanC. (1997). Effects of surfactants on the rotifer, Brachionus calyciflorus, in a chronic toxicity test and in the development of QSARs. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry16, 1051–1058.
60.
TongW.D., PerkinsR., StrelitzR., CollantesE.R., KeenanS., WelshW.J., BranhamW.S., & SheehanD.M. (1997). Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: Predictions across species. Environmental Health Perspectives105, 1116–1124.
61.
WallerC.L., OperaT.I., ChaeK., ParkH.K., KorachK.S., LawsS.C., WieseT.E., KelceW.R., & GrayL.E.Jr. (1996). Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chemical Research in Toxicology9, 1240–1248.
62.
TongW., FangH., HongH., XieQ., PerkinsR., & SheehanD.M. (2004). Receptor-mediated toxicity: QSARs for estrogen receptor binding and priority binding and priority setting of potential estrogenic endocrine disruptors. In Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate (eds CroninM.T.D., & LivingstoneD.J.), pp. 285–314. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
63.
DeardenJ.C. (2004). QSAR modelling of bioaccumulation. In Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate (eds CroninM.T.D., & LivingstoneD.J.), pp. 333–355. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
64.
DimitrovS.D., MekenyanO.G., & WalkerJ.D. (2002). Non-linear modeling of bioconcentration using partition coefficients for narcotic chemicals. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research13, 177–184.
HutchinsonT.H., BarrettS., BuzbyM., ConstableD., HartmannA., HayesE., HuggettD., LaengeR., LillicrapA.D., StruabJ.O., & ThompsonR.S. (2003). A strategy to reduce the numbers of fish used in acute excotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry22, 3031–3036.
67.
JeramS., Reigo SintesJ.M., HalderM., Baraibar FentanesJ., Sokull-KlluttgenB., & HutchinsonT.H. (2005). A strategy to reduce the number of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology42, 218–224.
68.
ESAC (2006). Statement on the Scientific Validity of the Upper Threshold Concentration (UTC) Step-Down Approach — A New Testing Strategy to Reduce the Use of Fish in Acute Aquatic Toxicity Testing. Website http://ecvam.jrc.it/index.htm (Accessed 27.06.06).
69.
WorthA.P., & BallsM. (2004). The principles of validation and the ECVAM validation process. ATLA32, 623–629.
70.
BallsM., & FentemJ.H. (1999). The validation and acceptance of alternatives to animal testing. Toxicology in Vitro13, 837–846.
ECB (2004). TAPIR 3.3 — A Project for the Information Requirements of REACH. Final Report, August 2nd 2005. Lot 3: Scoping Study on the Development of a Technical Guidance Document on Information Requirements on Intrinsic Properties of Substances (RIP 3.3-1).76 pp. Ispra, Italy: European Chemicals Bureau, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
73.
DiderichR. (2003). Environmental risk assessment. In Practical Guide to Chemical Safety Testing (ed. KnightD.J., & ThomasM.B.), pp. 163–189. Shawbury, Shropshire, UK: Rapra Technology Limited.
74.
KönemannH. (1981). Quantitative structure–activity relationships in fish toxicity studies. Part 1: Relationship for 50 industrial pollutants. Toxicology19, 209–221.
75.
VeithG.D., & BroderiusS.J. (1987). Structure–toxicity relationships for industrial chemicals causing type (II) narcosis syndrome. In QSAR in Environmental Toxicology — II (ed. KaiserK.L.E.) pp. 385–391. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
76.
CroninM.T.D., NetzevaT.I., DeardenJ.C., EdwardsR., & WorganA.D.P. (2004). Assessment and modelling of the toxicity of organic chemicals to Chlorella vulgaris: Development of a novel database. Chemical Research in Toxicology17, 545–554.
77.
PapaE., VillaF., & GramaticaP. (2005). Statistically validated QSARs, based on theoretical descriptors, for modeling aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences45, 1256–1266.
78.
MazzatortaP., VrackoM., JezierskaA., & BenfenatiE. (2003). Modeling toxicity by using supervised Kohonen neural networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences43, 485–492.
79.
BrandaoJ.C., BohetsH.H.L., Van de VyverI.E., & DierickxP.J. (1992). Correlation between the in vitro cytotoxicity to cultured fathead minnow fish cells and fish lethality data for 50 chemicals. Chemosphere25, 553–562.
80.
DierickxP.J. (1993). Comparison between fish lethality data and the in vitro cytotoxicity of lipophilic solvents to cultured fish cells in a two compartment model. Chemosphere27, 1511–1518.
81.
SaitoH., IwamiS., & ShigeokaT. (1991). In vitro cytotoxicity of 45 pesticides to goldfish GF-Scale (GFS) cells. Chemosphere23, 525–537.
82.
SaitoH., KoyasuJ., & YoshidaK. (1993). Cytotoxicity of 109 chemicals to goldfish GFS cells and relationships with 1-octanol/water partition coefficients. Chemosphere26, 1015–1028.
83.
SaitoH., KoyasuJ., ShigeokaT., & TomitaI. (1994). Cytotoxicity of chlorophenols to goldfish GFS cells with the MTT and LDH assays. Toxicology in Vitro8, 1107–1112.
84.
LangeM., GebauerW., MarklJ., & NagelR. (1995). Comparison of testing acute toxicity on embryo of zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio, and RTG-2 cytotoxicity as possible alternatives to the acute fish test. Chemosphere30, 2087–2102.
85.
BabichH., GoldsteinS.H., & BorenfreundE. (1990). In vitro cyto- and geno-toxicity of organomercurials to cells in culture. Toxicology Letters50, 143–149.
86.
BabichH., & BorenfreundE. (1990). In vitro cyto-toxicities of inorganic lead and di- and tri-alkyl lead compounds to fish cells. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology44, 456–460.
87.
BrüschweilerB.J., WürglerF.E., & FentK. (1995). Cytotoxicity in vitro of organotin compounds to fish hepatoma cells PLHC-1 (Poeciliopsis lucida). Aquatic Toxicology32, 143–160.
88.
BabichH., PuernerJ.A., & BorenfreundE. (1986). In vitro cytotoxicity of metals to bluegill (BF-2) cells. Archives of Environmental Contamination. and Toxicology15, 31–37.
89.
RuscheB., & KohlpothM. (1993). The R1 cytotoxicity test as replacement for the fish tests stipulated in the German Waste Water Act. In Fish Ecotoxicology and Ecophysiology (ed. BraunbeckT., HankeW., & SegnerH.), pp. 81–92. Weinheim, Germany: VCH-Wiley.
90.
CastañoA., VegaM.M., & TarazonaJ.V. (1995). Acute toxicity of selected metals and phenols on RTG-2 and CHSE-214 fish cell lines. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology55, 222–229.
