The ECVAM Skin Irritation Task Force was established in November 1996, primarily to prepare a report on the current status of the development and validation of alternative tests for skin irritation and corrosion and, in particular, to identify any appropriate non-animal tests for predicting human skin irritation which were sufficiently well-developed to warrant ECVAM supporting their prevalidation/validation. The task force based its discussions around the proposed testing strategy for skin irritation/corrosion emanating from an OECD workshop held in January 1996. The following have been reviewed: a) structure-activity and structure-property relationships for skin corrosion and irritation; b) the use of pH and acid/alkaline reserve measurements in predicting skin corrosivity; c) in vitro tests for skin corrosion; d) in vitro tests for skin irritation (keratinocyte cultures, organ cultures, and reconstituted human skin models); and e) human patch tests for skin irritation. It was apparent that, although several promising candidate in vitro tests for skin irritation (for example, reconstituted human skin methods, and human and animal skin organ culture methods) were under development and evaluation, a test protocol, a preliminary prediction model and supporting data on different types of chemicals were only available for a method employing EpiDerm™. Thus, it is proposed that this EpiDerm test undergoes prevalidation during 1998. In addition, since it was felt preferable to be able to include other in vitro tests in such a prevalidation study, it is recommended that a “challenge” be set to anyone interested in taking part. This involves submitting data on ten test chemicals selected by the task force, obtained according to a standard protocol with a preliminary prediction model, for review by the task force by 31 May 1998.
DraizeJ.H., WoodwardG., & CalveryH.O. (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes.Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics82, 377–390.
2.
FrazierJ.M. (1991). Alternatives to acute ocular and dermal toxicity tests in animals. In Dermatotoxicology, 4th edn (ed. MarzulliF.N., & MaibachH.I.), pp. 817–833. New York: Hemisphere Publishing.
3.
SwanstonD.W., BlackJ., DuffyP.A., & PembertonM.A. (1991). The current status of non-animal alternative methods in skin and eye irritancy testing. In Animals and Alternatives in Toxicology. Present Status and Future Prospects (ed. BallsM., BridgesJ., & SoutheeJ.), pp. 23–51. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.
4.
GadS.C. (1993). Alternatives to in vivo studies in toxicology. In General and Applied Toxicology (ed. BallantyneB., MarrsT., & TurnerP.), pp. 179–206. London: Macmillan Press.
5.
BasketterD.A. (1997). Skin irritation testing: what are the alternatives?Comments on Toxicology6, 87–100.
6.
BothamP.A., ChamberlainM., BarrattM.D., CurrenR.D., EsdaileD.J., GardinerJ.R., GordonV.C., HildebrandB., LewisR.W., LiebschM., LogemannP., OsborneR., PonecM., RégnierJ-F., SteilingW., WalkerA.P., & BallsM. (1995). A prevalidation study on in vitro skin corrosivity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 6.ATLA23, 219–255.
7.
FentemJ.H., ArcherG.E.B., BallsM., BothamP.A., CurrenR.D., EarlL.K., EsdaileD.J., HolzhütterH-G., & LiebschM. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. II. Results and evaluation by the Management Team.Toxicology in Vitro, in press.
8.
ChamberlainM., & EarlL. (1995). Use of cell cultures in irritancy testing. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. GoldbergA.M., & van ZutphenL.F.M.), pp. 59–67. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
9.
LawrenceJ.N. (1997). Application of in vitro human skin models to dermal irritancy: a brief overview and future prospects.Toxicology in Vitro11, 305–312.
10.
WilcoxD.K., & BrunerL.H. (1990). In vitro alternatives for ocular safety testing: an outline of assays and possible future developments.ATLA18, 117–128.
11.
BasketterD.A., WhittleE., & ChamberlainM. (1994). Identification of irritation and corrosion hazards to skin: an alternative strategy to animal testing.Food and Chemical Toxicology32, 539–542.
12.
SpielmannH., LovellW.W., HölzleE., JohnsonB.E., MaurerT., MirandaM.A., PapeW.J.W., SaporaO., & SladowskiD. (1994). In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2.ATLA22, 314–348.
13.
BasketterD.A., ScholesE.W., ChamberlainM., & BarrattM.D. (1995). An alternative strategy to the use of guinea-pigs for the identification of skin sensitisation hazard.Food and Chemical Toxicology33, 1051–1056.
14.
Anon. (1992). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 404: Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion.6 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
15.
Anon. (1996). Final Report of the OECD Workshop on Harmonization of Validation and Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Toxicological Test Methods.62 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
16.
Anon. (1997). Revised Step 2 Proposal for a Harmonized System for the Classification of Chemicals Which Cause Skin Irritation/Corrosion, Draft. ENV/MC/CHEM/HCL (97)3, 12 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
17.
BarrattM.D. (1996). Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols: principal components and neural network analysis of extended datasets.Toxicology in Vitro10, 85–94.
18.
BarrattM.D. (1996). Quantitative structure-activity relationships for skin irritation and corrosivity of neutral and electrophilic organic chemicals.Toxicology in Vitro10, 247–256.
19.
BarrattM.D., BrantomP.G., FentemJ.H., GernerI., WalkerA.P., & WorthA.P. (1998). The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. I. Selection and distribution of the test chemicals.Toxicology in Vitro, in press.
20.
KrauseP., FoxJ., & JudsonP. (1993/4). An argumentation-based approach to risk assessment.IMA Journal of Mathematics Applied in Business and Industry5, 249–263.
21.
DeardenJ.C., BarrattM.D., BenigniR., BristolD W., CombesR.D., CroninM.T.D., JudsonP.N., PayneM.P., RichardA.M., TichyM., WorthA.P., & YourickJ.J. (1997). The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity. The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM workshop 24).ATLA25, 223–252.
22.
PayneM.P., & MorleyJ. (1997). Structure-activity rules for skin and eye irritation and corrosion (abstract).Human and Experimental Toxicology16, 410.
23.
WorthA.P., BarrattM.D., & HoustonJ.B. (1998). The validation of computational prediction techniques.ATLA26, 241–247.
24.
YoungJ.R., HowM.J., WalkerA.P., & WorthW.M.H. (1988). Classification as corrosive or irritant to skin of preparations containing acidic or alkaline substances without testing on animals.Toxicology in Vitro2, 19–26.
25.
YoungJ.R., & HowM.J. (1994). Product classification as corrosive or irritant by measuring pH and acid/alkali reserve. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology: Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.I.), pp. 23–27. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
26.
Anon. (1993). Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of 27 April 1993 adapting to technical progress for the 18th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions Relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances.Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL110A, 1–86.
27.
PonecM. (1992). In vitro cultured human skin cells as alternatives to animals for skin irritancy screening.International Journal of Cosmetic Science14, 245–264.
28.
De LeoV.A., HarberL.C., KongB.M., & De SalvaS.J. (1987). Surfactant-induced alteration of arachidonic acid metabolism of mammalian cells in culture.Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology & Medicine184, 477–482.
29.
OsborneR., & PerkinsM.A. (1991). In vitro skin irritation testing with human skin cell cultures.Toxicology in Vitro5, 563–567.
30.
WilhelmK.P., SamblebeM., & SiegersC.P. (1994). Quantitative in vitro assessment of N-alkyl sulphate-induced cytotoxicity in human keratinocytes (HaCaT): comparison with in. vivo human irritation tests.British Journal of Dermatology130, 18–23.
31.
KortingH.C., HerzingerT., HartingerA., KerscherM., AngerpointnerT., & MaibachH.I. (1994). Discrimination of the irritancy potential of surfactants in vitro by two cytotoxicity assays using normal human keratinocytes, HaCaT cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblasts: correlation with in vivo data from a soap chamber assay.Journal of Dermatological Science7, 119–129.
32.
DicksonF.M., LawrenceJ.N., & BenfordD.J. (1994). Cytotoxicity of 12 chemicals of known human and animal skin irritation potential in human keratinocyte cultures.Toxicology in Vitro8, 661–663.
33.
KortingH.C., SchindlerS., HartingerA., KerscherM., AngerpointnerT., & MaibachH.I. (1994). MTT-assay and neutral red release (NRR)-assay: relative role in the prediction of the irritancy potential of surfactants.Life Sciences55, 533–540.
34.
EunH.C. (1995). In vitro skin irritancy: application of keratinocyte cell culture and its correlation with human patch test responses.Current Problems in Dermatology55, 231–236.
35.
BrosinA., WolfW., MattheusA., & HeiseH. (1997). Use of XTT assay to assess the cytotoxicity of different surfactants and metal salts in human keratinocytes (HaCaT).Acta Dermatologia Venereologia77, 26–28.
36.
van de SandtJ.J.M., van SchoonhovenJ., MaasW.J.M., & RuttenA.A.J.J.L. (1993). Skin organ culture as an alternative to in vivo dermatotoxicity testing.ATLA21, 443–449.
37.
van de SandtJ.J.M., & RuttenA.A.J.J.L. (1995). Differential effects of chemical irritants in rabbit and human skin organ cultures.Toxicology in Vitro9, 157–168.
38.
van de SandtJ.J.M., BosT.A., & RuttenA.A.J.J.L. (1995). Epidermal cell proliferation and terminal differentiation in skin organ culture after topical exposure to sodium dodecyl sulfate.In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology31, 761–766.
39.
van de SandtJ.J.M., MaasW.J.M., DoorninkP.C., & RuttenA.A.J.J.L. (1995). Release of arachidonic and linoleic acid metabolites in skin organ cultures as characteristic of in vivo skin irritancy.Fundamental and Applied Toxicology25, 20–28.
40.
van de SandtJ.J.M., RuttenA.A.J.J.L., & KoëterH.B.W.M. (1993). Cutaneous toxicity testing in organ culture: neutral red uptake and reduction of tetrazolium salt (MTT).Toxicology in Vitro7, 81–86.
41.
PittermannW., JackwerthB., & SchmittM. (1997). The isolated perfused bovine udder skin model: a new in vitro model for the assessment of skin penetration and irritation.In Vitro Toxicology10, 17–21.
42.
BellE., EhrlichH.P., ButtleD.J., & NakatsujiT. (1981). Living tissue formed in vitro and accepted as skin-equivalent tissue of full thickness.Science211, 1051–1054.
43.
RosdyM., & ClaussL.C. (1990). Complete human epidermal cell differentiation in chemical defined medium at the air-liquid interface on inert filter substrates.Journal of Investigative Dermatology95, 409–414.
44.
TinoisE., TillierJ., GaucherandM., DumasH., TardyM., & ThivoletJ. (1991). In vitro and post-transplantation differentiation of human keratinocytes grown on the human type IV collagen film of a bilayered dermal substitute.Experimental Cell Research193, 310–319.
45.
RoguetR., & SchaeferH. (1997). Overview of in vitro cell culture technologies and pharmacotoxicological applications.Toxicology in Vitro11, 591–599.
46.
KubilusJ., CannonC., NealP., SennotH., & KlausnerM. (1996). Response of the EpiDerm. skin model to topically applied irritants.In Vitro Toxicology9, 157–166.
47.
PonecM., & KempenaarJ. (1995). Use of skin recombinants as an in vitro model for testing the irritation potential of cutaneous irritants.Skin Pharmacology8, 49–59.
48.
PruniérasM. (1994). Skin and epidermal equivalents: a review. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 10, In Vitro Skin Toxicology: Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA.M., & MaibachH.I.), pp. 97–105. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
49.
RoguetR., CohenC., & LeclaireJ. (1995). The use of a human reconstructed epidermis EPISKIN for the assessment of safety and efficacy of cosmetic products.In Vitro Toxicology8, 427–429.
50.
RoguetR., CohenC., DossouK.G., & RougierA. (1994). EPISKIN, a reconstituted human epidermis for assessing in vitro the irritancy of topically applied compounds.Toxicology in Vitro8, 283–291.
51.
CannonC.L., NealP.J., SoutheeJ.A., KubilusJ., & KlausnerM. (1994). New epidermal model for dermal irritancy testing.Toxicology in Vitro8, 889–891.
52.
RoguetR. (1997). Cutaneous pharmacotoxicology in vitro. In In Vitro Methods in Pharmaceutical Research (ed. CastellJ.V., & Gómez-LechónM.J.), pp. 241–264. London, UK: Academic Press.
53.
RoguetR., RegnierM., CohenC., DossouK.G., & RougierA. (1994). The use of in vitro reconstituted skin in dermotoxicity testing.Toxicology in Vitro8, 635–639.
54.
DoucetO., RobertC., & ZastrowL. (1996). Use of a serum-free reconstituted epidermis as a skin pharmacological model.Toxicology in Vitro10305–313.
55.
RoguetR., CohenC., RoblesC., CourtellemontP., TolleM., GuillotJ.P., & Pouradier DuteilX. (1998). An interlaboratory study of the reproducibility and relevance of EPISKIN, a reconstructed human epidermis, in the assessment of cosmetics irritancy.Toxicology in Vitro, in press.
56.
Anon. (1995). Skin Irritation and Corrosion: Reference Chemicals Data Bank. ECETOC Technical Report No. 66, 247 pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.
57.
BagleyD.M., GardnerJ.R., HollandG., LewisR.W., RégnierJ-F., StringerD.A., & WalkerA.P. (1996). Skin irritation: reference chemicals data bank.Toxicology in Vitro10, 1–6.
58.
BasketterD.A., ChamberlainM., GriffithsH.A., RowsonM., WhittleE., & YorkM. (1997). The classification of skin irritants by human patch test.Food and Chemical Toxicology35, 845–852.
59.
GriffithsH.A., WilhelmK-P., RobinsonM.K., WangX.M., McFaddenJ., YorkM., & BasketterD.A. (1997). Interlaboratory evaluation of a human patch test for the identification of skin irritation potential/hazard.Food and Chemical Toxicology35, 255–260.
60.
BasketterD., ReynoldsF., RowsonM., TalbotC., & WhittleE. (1997). Visual assessment of human skin irritation: a sensitive and reproducible tool.Contact Dermatitis37, 218–220.
61.
Anon. (1997). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. Proposal for a Draft New Guideline. Acute Dermal Irritation Study in Human Volunteers. ENV/MC/CHEM/TG(97)16, 7 pp. Paris France: OECD.
62.
FentemJ.H., & BallsM. (1997). The ECVAM approach to validation. In Developments in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Vol. 27, Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Utrecht 20–24 October 1996 (ed. van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM.), pp. 1083–1089. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
63.
BasketterD.A., Hall-ManningT., RobinsonM.K., WhittleE., & YorkM. (1998). Determination of acute skin irritation potential in the human 4-hour patch test.Food and Chemical Toxicology, in press.
