Bourhis, R. Y.
, & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 119-135). London: Academic Press.
2.
Bradac, J. J.
, Cargile, A. C., & Hallett, J. S. (in press). Language attitudes: Retrospect, conspect, and prospect. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
3.
Bradac, J. J.
, Hemphill, M. R., & Tardy, C. H. (1981). Language style on trial: Effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech upon judgments of victims and villains. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 327-341.
4.
Brown, B. L.
, Giles, H., & Thackerar, J. N. (1985). Speaker evaluations as a function of speech rate, accent, and context. Language and Communication, 5, 207-220.
5.
Cole, T.
, & Leets, L. (1998). Linguistic masking devices and intergroup behavior: Further evidence of an intergroup linguistic bias. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 348-371.
6.
Erickson, B.
, Johnson, B. C., Lind, A. E., & O’Barr, W. M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279.
7.
Fairclough, N.
(1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
8.
Fowler, R.
, Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9.
Galliker, M.
, Herman, J., Imminger, K., & Weimer, D. (1998). The investigation of contiguity: Co-occurrence analysis of print media using CD-ROMs as a new data source, illustrated by a discussion on migrant delinquency in a daily newspaper. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 200-219.
10.
Gibbons, P.
, Bradac, J. J., & Busch, J. D. (1992). The role of language in negotiation: Threats and promises. In L. L. Putnam & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), Communication and negotiation (pp. 156-175). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Giles, H.
, & Coupland, N. (1991). Language: Contexts and consequences. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12.
Hosman, L. A.
(1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383-406.
13.
Labov, W.
(1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
Maass, A.
, Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
15.
Mulac, A.
(1998). The gender-linked language effect: Do language differences really make a difference? In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 127-155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Ng, S. H.
, & Bradac, J. J. (1993). Power in language. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Orwell, G.
(1984). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker and Warburg.
18.
Prentice, D. A.
(1994). Do language reforms change our way of thinking?Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 3-19.
19.
Rogan, R. G.
, & Hammer, M. R. (1995). Assessing message affect in crisis negotiations: An exploratory study. Human Communication Research, 21, 553-574.
20.
Smith, B.
, Brown, B. L., Strong, W. J., Rencher, A. C. (1975). Effects of speech rate on personality perception. Language and Speech, 18, 145-152.
21.
Trudgill, P.
(1983). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Hammondsworth, UK: Penguin.
22.
Wiener, M.
, & Mehrabian, A. (1967). Language within language: Non-immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.