The examination of verbal slips is an established method for investigating the cognitive structures and mechanisms of normal speech production. The present study includes double entendres as a cousin of the verbal slip, and attempts to determine the cognitive-processing origins of both through an examination of naturalistic and laboratory observations. Several categories of antecedent conditions are proposed, with implications for the cognitive efficiency of normal, error-free, speech production; and in particular, with implications of polysemantic activation within a spreading-activation lexicon.
References
1.
Baars, B. J. (1977) The planning of speech: Is there semantic editing prior to speech articulation? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
2.
Baars, B. J.
(1980) The competing plans hypothesis: An heuristic approach to the problem of speech errors. In H. W. Dechert and M. Raupach (eds), Temporal variables in speech, pp. 141-152. Paris: Mouton.
3.
Baars, B. J. and Mattson, M. E. (1983) Evidence for bottom-up flow of control and speech production. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Psychology.
4.
Baars, B. J.
and Motley, M. T. (1976) Spoonerisms as sequencer conflicts: Evidence from artificially elicited speech errors. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 467-484.
5.
Baars, B. J. and Motley, M. T. (1982) Mechanisms for avoiding overt errors in speech: The case of sentential violations of semantic rules. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Psychology.
6.
Chomsky, N.
(1959) Review of Skinner's Verbal Behaviour. Language, 35, 26-58.
7.
Collins, A. M.
and Loftus, E. F. (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
8.
Collins, A. M.
and Quillian, M. R. (1969) Retrieval time for semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8, 240-247.
9.
Cooper, W.
and Ross, J. R. (1975) World order. In R. E. Grossman (ed.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism, pp. 63-111. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
10.
Dell, O. S.
and Reich, P. A. (1980) Toward a unified model of slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (ed.), Errors in linguistic performance, pp. 273-286. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Fay, D.
(1980) Transformational errors. In V. A. Fromkin (ed.), Errors in linguistic performance, pp. 111-122. New York: Academic Press.
12.
Freud, S.
(1901) Psychopathology of everyday life (J. Strachey, Trans.). London: Ernest Benn (1966).
13.
Fromkin, V. A.
(1973) Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 229, 110-117.
14.
Fromkin, V. A.
(ed.) (1980) Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.
15.
Kupin, J. J. (1979) Tongue twisters as a source of information about speech production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
16.
Mattson, M. E. (1984) Spreading activation networks. Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Department of Psychology.
17.
Motley, M. T.
(1973) An analysis of spoonerisms as psycholinguistic phenomena. Speech Monographs, 40, 66-71.
18.
Motley, M. T.
(1974) Verbal conditioning-generalization in encoding: A hint at the structure of the lexicon. Speech Monographs, 41, 152-162.
19.
Motley, M. T.
(1980) Verification of 'Freudian slips' and semantic prearticulatory editing via laboratory-induced spoonerisms. In V. A. Fromkin (ed.), Errors in linguistic performance, pp. 133-147. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Motley, M. T.
(1985a) Consciousness and intentionality in communication: A preliminary model and methodological approaches. Paper presented to the Western Speech Communication Association; Fresno, CA.
21.
Motley, M. T.
(1985b) Verbal slips. Scientific American, 253, 116-126.
22.
Motley, M. T.
and Baars, B. J. (1975) Encoding sensitivities to phonological markedness and traditional probability: Evidence from spoonerisms. Human Communication research, 2, 353-361.
23.
Motley, M. T.
(1976a) Laboratory induction of verbal slips. A new method for psycholinguistic research. Communication Quarterly, 24, 28-34.
24.
Motley, M. T.
(1976b) Semantic bias effects on the outcome of verbal slips. Cognition, 4, 177-187.
25.
Motley, M. T.
(1978) Laboratory verification of 'Freudian' slips of the tongue as evidence of prearticulatory semantic editing. In B. Rubin (ed.), Communication Yearbook II, pp. 141-152. New Brunswick: Transaction.
26.
Motley, M. T.
(1979) Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421-432.
27.
Motley, M. T.Baars, B. J.
and Camden, C. T. (1981) Syntactic criteria in prearticulatory editing: Evidence from laboratory-induced slips of the tongue. Journal of Psycho-linguistic Research, 5, 503-522.
28.
Motley, M. T.Baars, B. J.
and Camden, C. T. (1983a) Experimental verbal slip studies: A review and an editing model of language encoding. Communication Monographs, 50, 79-101.
29.
Motley, M. T.Baars, B. J.
and Camden, C. T. (1983b) Formulation hypotheses revisited: A reply to Stemberger. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 561-565.
30.
Motley, M. T.
and Camden, C. T. (1985) Nonlinguistic influences on lexical selection: Evidence from double entendres. Communication Monographs, 52, 124-135.
31.
Motley, M. T.
, Camden, C. T. and Baars, B. J. (1979) Personality and situational influences upon verbal slips: A laboratory test of Freudian and prearticulatory-editing hypotheses. Human Communication Research, 5, 195-202.
32.
Motley, M. T.
, Camden, C. T. and Baars, B. J. (1981) Toward verifying the assumptions of laboratory-induced slips of the tongue: The output-error and editing issues. Human Communication Research, 8, 3-15.
33.
Motley, M. T.
, Camden, C. T. and Baars, B. J. (1982) Covert formulation and editing of anomalies in speech production: Evidence from experimentally elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 578-594.
34.
Motley, M. T.
, Camden, C. T. and Baars, B. J. (1983) Polysemantic lexical access: Evidence from laboratory-induced double entendres. Communication Monographs, 50, 193-205.
35.
Reich, P. A.
(1984) Unintended puns. The Eleventh LACUS Forum, 1, 1-8.
36.
Stemberger, J. P.
(1982) Syntactic errors in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 313-345.
37.
Stemberger, J. P.
(1983) Context effects in language production: A reply to Motley. et al. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 554-560.
38.
Stemberger, J. P.
(1984) Structural errors in normal and agramatic speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 281-313.
