Evaluating the X-Lib Library Automation System at Babcock University,Nigeria: A case study

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the potential of the X-Lib Library Automation System in Nigerian university libraries through an assessment of how it meets the current and future requirements of Babcock University Library. The current and future potential of X-Lib in Babcock University Library were examined using the R²ISC criteria. The criteria used to evaluate current potential included: the ability of Xlib to accommodate a large collection; ability to integrate the basic operations of acquisitions, cataloguing, and circulation; modular design; ease of use; ability to search and retrieve records by various fields; ability to produce end user reports; ability to define security or restrict users to specific screens; ability to perform specialized services; and backup and restore utility. The criteria analysed to determine future potential included: response time; level of configurability; operating system; upgrade; hardware; and the future of the developer or vendor. The result showed 62.6 and 45.5 percentage fits respectively to the current and future requirements of the Babcock University Library. The strengths and limitations of X-Lib are highlighted.

Keywords

library automation systems evaluation X-Lib Library Automation System university libraries Nigeria

References

Adamson, V. et al. (2008) JISC & SCONUL Library Management Systems Study: an evaluation and horizon scan of the current library management systems and related systems landscape for UK higher education. Sheffield, UK: Sero Consulting Ltd, March 2008. 157p. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/resourcediscovery/lmsstudy.pdf (Accessed 26 February 2009).

Adedigba, Y.A. and Ezomo, E.O. ( 2003) The management of systems migration in an African setting. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science , 13(1): 33-42.

Babcock University (1999) Babcock University handbook, 1999-2001. Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria: Babcock University. pp. 12-15.

Bandor, M.S. ( 2006) Quantitative method for software selection and evaluation . Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute. Available at: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/06.reports/06tn026.html (Accessed 16 April 2009).

Baumgartner, P. and Payr, S. ( 2001) Methods and practice of software evaluation. The case of the European Academic Software Award. Available at: http://www.medidaprix.org/mdd_2001/easa-evaluation.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2009).

BERAM (2000) X-Lib library automation system user guide. Lagos: BERAM , 83p.

Dempsey, L. ( 2006) The digital library environment: ten years after. Ariadne, Issue 46. Available at: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/dempsey/ (Accessed 25 February 2009).

Doll, C.A. ( 1987) Evaluating educational software. Chicago /London: American Library Association .

Dromey, R.G. ( 1994) A model for software product quality. Brisban, Australia: Software Quality Institute. Available at: http://www.sqi.gu.edu.au/docs/sqi/technical/Model_For_S_W_Prod_Qual.pdf (Accessed 25 February 2009).

10.

Hollander, N. ( 2000) A guide to software evaluation and selection. New York: American Management Association. pp. 2-33.

11.

Karetzky, S. ( 1998) Choosing an automated system. Library Journal, 123(11): 42.

12.

LISWiki (2006) Criteria for evaluation of library software packages. Available at: http://liswiki.org/wiki/Criteria_for_evaluation_of_library_software_packages (Accessed 5 February 2009).

13.

McIntyre, K. ( 1999) The second time around: lessons in migrating a K-12 library automation program. Texas Library Journal, 75(1): 28-31.

14.

Sandhu, G. ( 2007) The search for a library management system for the lib-infosphere. INFLIBNET Convention Proceedings, 5th International CALIBER 08 -10 February 2007: Information and Knowledge Management in Networked World, Panjab University, Chandigarh . pp 330-338. Available at: http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/1944/552/1/330-338(cal%2007).pdf (Accessed 5 February 2009).

15.

Scriven, M. ( 1991) Introduction: The nature of evaluation In: Evaluation thesaurus, 4th ed. Newbury Park: Sage. pp. 1-43.

16.

Van Staaden, P. and Lubbe, S. ( 2006) A case study on the selection and evaluation of software for an Internet organization. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 4(1): 57-66. Available at: http://www.ejbrm.com/vol4/v4-i1/Van_Staaden_Lubbe.pdf (Accessed 16 March 2009).

17.

Worthen, B.R. and Sanders, J.R. ( 1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains: Longman .