In the age of information revolution, information and communication technologies are penetrating all levels of societies and affecting the process of development in every country. In this era, the government and the people of each country have an important role in the strengthening or weakening of the process. This study examines the effect of ICT on political development in Iran, as an important component of the process of development. In order to explore the effect comprehensively, the government and the people are used as two critical groups which affect political development. This study uses the interview method and employs qualitative approaches such as grounded theory and narrative inquiry. Twenty-six government officials and policy makers of Iran, and 31 ordinary citizens of Tehran (the capital of Iran) were interviewed to investigate how ICT affects political development. The results were grouped into five categories: political empowerment and public control, as two factors which affect the political development of people; and capacity building, public service, and transparency as three elements which affect political development in government. The explanation of each factor regarding the effects of ICT on political development is discussed. In the end, some ideas for further research are presented.
Adserà, A., Boix, C., and Payne, M. ( 2003) Are you being served? Political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization , 19(2), 445-490.
2.
Albrecht, S. ( 2006) Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication and Society, 9(1), 62-82.
3.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K.Y.A., and Tal, S. ( 2008) E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1776-1789.
4.
Armstrong, C.L. ( 2011) Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites. Government Information Quarterly , 28(1), 11-16.
5.
Baybeck, B., and Huckfeldt, R. ( 2002) Urban contexts, spatially dispersed networks, and the diffusion of political information. Political Geography, 21(2), 195-220.
6.
Bekkers, V. ( 2003) Reinventing government in the information age. International practice in IT-enabled public sector reform. Public Management Review, 5(1), 133-139.
7.
Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., and Grimes, J.M.(2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.
8.
Bimber, B. ( 1998) The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160.
9.
Bimber, B. ( 2003) Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Binder, L. ( 1971) Crisis and sequence in political development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Blair, H. ( 2000) Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21-39.
12.
Carvalho, R.B., and Ferreira, M.A.T. (2001) Using information technology to support knowledge conversion processes. Information Research , 7(1), 1-7.
13.
Casey, K. ( 1995) The new narrative research in education. Review of Research in Education, 21, 211-253.
14.
Chiang, L., and Liao, C.(2009) The influence of digital standardization on administrative efficiency in e-government: A view of standards development organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(4), 455-468.
15.
Clarke, H.D., Sanders, D., Stewarts, M.C., and Whitely, P.F. ( 2009) Performance politics and the British voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Coombs, W.T., and Cutbirth, C.W. ( 1998) Mediated political communication, the Internet, and the new knowledge elites: prospects and portents. Telematics and Informatics, 15(3), 203-217.
17.
Creswell, J.W. ( 1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
18.
Cuillier, D. and Piotrowski, S.J.(2009) Internet information-seeking and its relation to support for access to government records. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 441-449.
19.
Dahlgren, P. ( 2005) The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162.
20.
Dawes, S.S.(2010) Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377-383.
21.
Desanctis, G., Fayard, A., Roach, M., and Jiang, L. ( 2003) Learning in online forums. European Management Journal, 21(5), 565-577.
22.
Dris-Aït-Hamadouche, L., and Zoubir, Y. ( 2007) The Maghreb: Social, political, and economic developments . Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 6, 261-290.
23.
Eisenstadt, S.N. ( 1963) the political systems of empires. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
24.
Ferejohn, J. ( 1990) Information and the electoral process, In John A. Ferejohn and James Kuklinski, eds. Information and democratic processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
25.
Fountain, J.E. ( 2001) Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. ( 1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
27.
Grossman, Lawrence. K. ( 1995) The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York: Viking.
28.
Gupta, B., Dasguptab, S., and Guptac, A. ( 2008) Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 140-154.
29.
Hartley, T., and Russett, B. ( 1992) Public opinion and the common defense: Who governs military spending in the United States? The American Political Science Review, 86(4), 905-915.
30.
He, K., and Feng, H. ( 2008) A path to democracy: In search of China’s democratization model. Asian Perspective, 32(3), 139-169.
31.
Heinonen, S., Jokinen, P., and Kaivo-oja, J. ( 2001) The ecological transparency of the information society . Futures, 33(3-4), 319-337.
32.
Holcombe, R. ( 2002) Liberty and democracy as economic systems. The Independent Review, 6(3), 407-425.
33.
Huntington, S.P. ( 1968) Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
34.
Johnson, S.M. ( 1998) The Internet changes everything: Revolutionizing public participation and access to government information through the Internet. Administrative Law Review, 50(2), 277-37.
35.
Kaye, B.K., and Johnson, T.J. ( 2004) A web for all reasons: Uses and gratifications of Internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics , 21(3), 197-223.
36.
Klitgaard, R. ( 1997) Cleaning up and invigorating the civil service. Public Administration and Development17(5): 487-509.
37.
Kraemer, K.L., Andersen, K.V., and Perry, J.L. ( 1994) Information technology and transitions in the public service: A comparison of Scandinavia and the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(10), 1871-1905.
38.
La Palombara, Joseph ( 1971) Penetration: A crisis of government capacity, in Leonard Binder et al (eds), Crises and sequences in political development, Princeton : Princeton University Press.
39.
Lee, E.J., and Jang, J.W.(2010) Profiling good Samaritans in online knowledge forums: Effects of affiliative tendency, self-esteem, and public individuation on knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1336-1344.
40.
Lee, M. ( 2004) Public reporting: A neglected aspect of nonprofit accountability . Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(2), 169-185.
41.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., and Lazer, D. ( 2007) Governance and information technology: From electronic government to information government. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Moloi, J., and Mutula, S. ( 2007) E-records management in an e-government setting in Botswana . Information Development, 23(4), 290-306.
43.
Montgomery, J.D. ( 1969) Review: The quest for political development. Comparative Politics, 1(2), 285-295.
44.
Montgomery, J.D., and Siffin, W.L. (Eds.). (1966) Approaches to development: Politics, administration and change. McGraw-Hill Series in international Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Msibi, F., and Penzhorn, C.(2010) Participatory communication for local government in South Africa: a study of the Kungwini Local Municipality. Information Development , 26(3), 225-236.
46.
Ncholo, P. ( 2000) Reforming the public service in South Africa: A policy framework. Public Administration and Development, 20, 87-102.
47.
Ngowi, H.P. ( 2009) Economic development and change in Tanzania since independence: The political leadership factor. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(4), 259-267.
48.
Norris, P. ( 2001) Digital divide. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Oberg, P. ( 2002) Does administrative corporatism promote trust and deliberation ? Governance, 15(4), 455-475.
50.
Organski, A.F.K. ( 1965) Stages of political development. New York: Knopf.
51.
Patton, M.Q. ( 1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd. ed. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
52.
Pérez-Brito, C. ( 2009) Information as a development Intervention: Reforming the culture of information systems in Guatemala. Information Development , 25(4), 272-282.
53.
Pina, V., Torres, L., and Royo, S.(2010) Is e-government leading to more accountable and transparent local governments? An overall view. Financial Accountability & Management , 26(1), 3-20.
54.
Poullet, Y. ( 1998) Freedom and information highways or how to ensure electronic democracy. Telematics and Informatics, 15(3), 163-180.
55.
Pye, L.W. ( 1965) Introduction: Political culture and political development . In Lucian W. Pye and Sidney Verba (Eds.), Political culture and political development (pp. 3-26). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
56.
Pye, L.W. (Ed.). (1963) Communications and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
57.
Relly, J.E., and Sabharwal, M.(2009) Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 148-157.
58.
Ricci, A. ( 1998) Towards a systematic study of Internet-based political and social communication in Europe. Telematics and Informatics , 15(3), 135-161.
59.
Schultz, C. ( 2008) Information, polarization and term length in democracy . Journal of Public Economics, 92(5-6), 1078-1091.
60.
Sharma, G., and Sturges, P. ( 2007) Using ICT to Help the poor access public services: An action research programme. Information Development, 23(1), 15-24.
61.
Shim, D.C. and Eom, T.H. ( 2008) E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration , 31(3): 298-316.
62.
Slaughter, A.M. ( 1997) The real new world order. Foreign Affairs , 76(5), 183-197.
63.
Smith, A.E. ( 2009) Legitimate grievances preferences for democracy, system support, and political participation in Bolivia. Latin American Research Review, 44(3), 102-126.
64.
Tolbert, C.J., McNeal, R.S., and Smith, D.A. ( 2003) Enhancing civic engagement: The effect of direct democracy on political participation and knowledge. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3(1), 23-41.
65.
Tolbert, C., and Mossberger, K. ( 2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354-369.
66.
Torres, L., Pina, V., and Acerete, B. ( 2005) E-government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 217-238.
67.
Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C., and Moon, M.J. ( 2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391.
68.
Wong, W. and Welch, E. ( 2004) Does e-government promote accountability? A comparative analysis of website openness and government accountability, Governance, 17(2), 275 - 297.
69.
Wriston, W. ( 2004) Freedom and democracy in the information age. Technology in Society, 26(2-3), 321-325.
