Objectives: To investigate (1) rates of powered wheelchair use and level of user-rated functional performance at one-month follow-up, and (2) whether psychological variables were prospectively predictive of outcome.
Design: Prospective follow-up study.
Setting: UK hospital-based regional rehabilitation and mobility centre.
Participants: Volunteer adults with impaired mobility. Of 155 approached, 103 had baseline assessments. Of these, 81 (79%) provided outcome data. Mean age was 65.6 years (SD = 13.5); 55% were male.
Main outcome measures: Rate of day-to-day powerchair use, and users' perceptions of how well the powerchair allowed them to perform functional tasks.
Results: Among those with indoor-only chairs, 48% were 'less frequent' users; this rose to 72% among those with indoor/outdoor chairs. Excluding environmental reasons, rate of indoor use was predicted by baseline measures of verbal recall (P<0.001), figure copying (P=0.003) and global cognition (P=0.021). Among those with indoor/outdoor chairs, total rate of use was predicted by verbal recall (P= 0.001). Participants reported that the powerchair was effective in meeting their functional needs.
Conclusions: Powered wheelchair use was predicted by cognitive measures. Rates of use were relatively low, despite users' reports that the powerchair facilitated their everyday functioning well.
References
1.
Schoppen T., Boonstra A., Groothoff JW, de Vries J., Goeken LN, Eisma WHPhysical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2003; 84: 803-11.
2.
Massengale S. , Folden D., McConnell P., Stratton L., Whitehead V.Effect of visual perception, visual function, cognition, and personality on power wheelchair use in adults. Assist Technol2005; 17: 108-21.
3.
Tefft D., Guerette P., Furumasu J.Cognitive predictors of young children's readiness for powered mobility. Dev Med Child Neurol1999; 41: 665-70.
4.
Furumasu J., Guerette P., Tefft D.Relevance of the Pediatric Powered Wheelchair Screening Test for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol2004; 46: 468-74.
5.
Mendoza RJ, Pittenger DJ, Saftler SF, Weinstein CSA protocol for assessment of risk in wheelchair driving within a healthcare facility. Disabil Rehabil2003; 25: 520-26.
6.
Routhier F., Vincent C., Desrosiers J., Nadeau S.Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework . Disabil Rehabil2003; 25: 19-34.
7.
Batavia M., Batavia AI, Friedman R.Changing chairs: anticipating problems in prescribing wheelchairs. Disabil Rehabil2001; 23: 539-48.
8.
Brandt A., Iwarsson S., Stahle A.Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med2004; 36: 70-77.
9.
Green SBHow many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis?Multivariate Behav Res1991; 26: 499-510.
10.
Spss I.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 13.0. SPSS Inc, 2004.
11.
Mills T., Holms MB, Trefler E., Schmeler M., Fitzgerald S., Boninger M.Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair instrument. Disabil Rehabil2002; 24: 38-46.
12.
Mast BT, Allaire JCVerbal learning and everyday functioning in dementia: an application of latent variable growth curve modeling. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2006; 61: 167-73.
13.
Amato MP, Ponziani G., Pracucci G., Bracco L., Siracusa G., Amaducci L.Cognitive impairment in early-onset multiple sclerosis. Pattern, predictors, and impact on everyday life in a 4-year follow-up. Arch Neurol1995; 52: 168-72.
14.
Farmer JE, Eakman AMThe relationship between neuropsychological functioning and instrumental activities of daily living following acquired brain injury. Appl Neuropsychol1995; 2: 107-15.
15.
Christodoulou C., Deluca J., Lange G., Johnson SK, Sisto SA, Korn L., Natelson BHRelation between neuropsychological impairment and functional disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1998; 64: 431-34.
16.
Bandura A.Self-efficacy: The exercise of efficacy. Freeman, 1997.
17.
Roelands M. , Van Oost P., Depoorter A., Buysse A.A social-cognitive model to predict the use of assistive devices for mobility and self-care in elderly people. Gerontologist2002; 42: 39-50.
18.
Sweeney S., Taylor G., Calin A.The effect of a home based exercise intervention package on outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol2002; 29: 763-66.
19.
Mioshi E., Dawson K., Mitchell J., Arnold R., Hodges JRThe Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2006; 21: 1078-85.
20.
Randolph C.Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. Harcourt Assessment, 1998.
James M., Warrington EKVisual Object and Space Perception Test. Harcourt Assessment , 1991.
23.
Benton AL, Hamsher K.Multilingual Aphasia Examination. University of Iowa, 1976.
24.
Wilson BA, Alderman N., Burgess PW, Emslie H., Evans JJBehavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Harcourt Assessment, 1996.
25.
Money JAStandardized road map test of direction sense. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.
26.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SHThe structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther1995; 33: 335-42.
27.
Mahoney FI, Barthel D.Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J1965; 14: 56-61.
28.
Crawford JR, Allan KMEstimating premorbid IQ with demographic variables: regression equations derived from a U.K. sampleClin Neuropsychol1997; 11: 192-97.
