Is surface EMG biofeedback an effective training method for persons with neck and shoulder complaints after whiplash-associated disorders concerning activities of daily living and pain — a randomized controlled trial
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2010
Is surface EMG biofeedback an effective training method for persons with neck and shoulder complaints after whiplash-associated disorders concerning activities of daily living and pain — a randomized controlled trial
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of surface electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme regarding consequences for activities of daily living and pain.
Design: A randomized controlled unblinded trial.
Settings: The study was carried out in a pain unit at a rehabilitation centre.
Subjects: Sixty-five people with chronic whiplash-associated disorders consecutively referred to the pain unit agreed to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group.
Intervention: All participants received interdisciplinary rehabilitation and the treatment group also had four weeks of surface EMG biofeedback training.
Main measures: The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure was used at admission discharge and at six-month follow-up to register changes in activities of daily living. The Multidimensional Pain Inventory, Swedish version, was used at admission and at six-month follow-up to capture the multidimensional aspects of pain.
Results: Sixty-two people completed the study. Both treatment and control groups improved significantly according to the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure at discharge and the results remained after six months (P<0.001). The subscale ‘Interference’ on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory was significantly decreased at six months for the treatment group (P<0.001). No differences were found between the two groups for activities of daily living (performance P = 0.586; satisfaction P = 0.988) at follow-up or for pain level (P = 0.914), indicating no additional effect of the surface EMG biofeedback training.
Conclusion: In this study there was no support for the effectiveness of surface EMG biofeedback training as a supplement to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme for people with long-lasting pain after whiplash.
References
1.
Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining ‘whiplash’ and its management. Spine1995; 20: 1S-73S.
2.
The Whiplash Commission final report. Sweden: Sandviken, 2005.
3.
McCracken L. , Turk D.Behavioral and cognitive treatment for chronic pain. Spine2002; 27: 2564-73.
4.
Wade D., de Jong B.Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ2000 ; 320: 1385-8.
5.
Bunketorp L.Analysis and management of whiplash associated disorders. Studies of prevalence, disability, pain perception, pain-related cognitions and supervised physical training tailored to the individual needs of patients. Doctor’s thesis. Göteborg: Institute of Occupational and Physiotherapy Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborgs University, 2005.
6.
Söderlund A., Olerud C., Lindberg P.Acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): the effects of early mobilization and prognostic factors in long-term symptomatology . Clin Rehabil2000; 14: 457-67.
7.
Kylbäck M., Thierfelder T., Söderlund A.Prognostic factors in whiplash-associated disorders. Int J Rehabil Res2002; 25: 181-7.
8.
Persson E., Rivano-Fischer M., Eklund M.Evaluation of changes in occupational performance among patients in a pain management program. J Rehabil Med2004 ; 36: 85-91.
9.
Gerdle B.Whiplashrelaterade tillstånd och dessas rehabilitering. Rapport till Whiplashkommisionen, version 3.0. Sandviken, 2005.
10.
Smedby B., Dahl T.WHO: s nya klassifikation av funktionstillstånd, funktionshinder och hälsa. En presentation av ICF. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift2002; 6: 487-95.
11.
Stroud M., Thorn B., Jensen M., Boothby J.The relation between pain beliefs, negative thoughts, and psychosocial functioning in chronic pain patients. Pain2000; 84: 347-52.
12.
Townsend E (ed.). Enabling occupation, an occupational therapy perspective. Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 1997.
13.
Nederhand M. , IJzerman M., Hermens H., Baten Ch , Zilvold G.Cervical muscle dysfunction in the chronic whiplash associated disorder grade II (WAD-II) . Spine2000; 25: 1938-43.
14.
Elert J., Kendall SA, Larsson B. et al. Chronic pain and difficulty in relaxing postural muscles in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic whiplash associated disorders. J Rheum2001; 28: 1361-8.
15.
Veiersted KBSustained muscle tension as a risk factor for trapezius myalgia. Int J Indust Ergon1994 ; 14: 333-9.
16.
Hägg GM , Åström A.Load pattern and pressure pain threshold in the upper trapezius muscle and psychosocial factors in medical secretaries with and without shoulder/neck disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health1997; 69: 423-32.
17.
Voerman G., Vollenbroek-Hutten M., Hermens H.Changes in pain, disability, and muscle activation patterns in chronic whiplash patients after ambulant myofeedback training. Clin J Pain2006; 22: 656-63.
18.
Liedberg G. , Henriksson C.Factors of importance for disability in women with fibromyalgia: an interview study. Arthritis Rheum2002; 47: 266-74.
19.
Engel J.Pain management In Hopkins HL, Smith HD. eds. Willard & Spackman’s Occupational therapy, eighth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993, 596-603.
20.
Stein F., Roose B.Pocket guide to treatment in occupational therapy. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group Thomson Learning , 2000, 206.
21.
Angoules AG , Balakatounis KC, Panagiotopoulou KA, Mavrogenis AF, Mitsiokapa EA, Papagelopoulos PJEffectiveness of electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain . Orthopedics2008; 31: 980-4.
22.
Schult M-L.Multidimensional assessment of people with chronic pain. An occupational therapy perspective. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis2001.
23.
Basmajian JVBiofeedback in rehabilitation: a review of principles and practices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1981; 62: 469-75.
24.
Flor H., Haag G., Turk D.Long-term efficacy of EMG biofeedback for chronic rheumatic back pain . Pain1986; 27: 195-202.
25.
Arena JG, Bruno GM, Hannah SL, Meador KJA comparison of frontal electromyographic biofeedback training, trapezius electromyographic biofeedback training, and progressive muscle relaxation therapy in the treatment of tension headache. Headache1995; 35: 411-19.
26.
Spence S., Sharpe L., Newton-John T., Champion D.Effect of EMG biofeedback compared to applied relaxation training with chronic, upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders. Pain1995; 63: 199-206.
27.
Rokicki LA, Holroyd KA, France CHR, Lipchic GL, France JL, Kvaal SAChange mechanisms associated with combined relaxation/EMG biofeedback training for chronic tension headache. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback1997; 22: 21-41.
28.
Kröner-Herwig B., Mohn U., Pothmann R.Comparison of biofeedback and relaxation in the treatment of pediatric headache and the influence of parent involvement on outcome. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback1998; 23: 143-57.
29.
Vollenbroek-Hutten M., Hermens H., Voerman G., Sandsjö L., Kadefors R.Are changes in pain induced by myofeedback training related to changes in muscle activation patterns in patients with work-related myalgia?Eur J Appl Physiol2006 ; 96: 209-15.
30.
Law M., Babtiste S., Carswell A., McColl MA, Polatajko H., Pollock N.Canadian performance measure, second edition. Toronto: CAOT Publications, 1994 .
31.
Palm A., Andersson C., Freeman A., Juhela P., Palm U.Kognitivt förhållningssätt. En psykologisk teori för samverkan med patienten. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 2000.
32.
Hermens HJ, Freriks B., Disselhorst-Klug C., Rau G.Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedure . J Electomyogr Kinesiol2000; 10: 361-74.
33.
Kielhofner G.The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance. In Kielhofner G. ed. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co., 2004, 94-109.
34.
Wressle E., Samuelsson K., Henriksson C.Responsiveness of the Swedish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scand J Occup Ther1999 ; 6: 84-9.
35.
Carswell A. , McColl MA, Babtiste S., Law M., Polatajko H., Pollok N.The Canadian Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther2004; 71: 210-22.
36.
Bergström G., Jensen IB, Bodin L., Linton SJ, Nygren ÅL, Carlsson SGReliability and factor structure of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Swedish language version (MPI-S). Pain1998; 75: 101-10.
37.
Kazis L., Anderson J., Meenan R.Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care1989; 27: 178-89.
38.
Nord S., Ettare D., Drew D., Hodge S.Muscle learning therapy - efficacy of a biofeedback based protocol in treating work-related upper extremity disorders. J Occup Rehabil2001; 11: 23-31.
39.
Drexler A., Mur E., Gũnther V.Efficacy of an EMG-biofeedback therapy in fibromyalgia patients. A comparative study of patients with and without abnormality in (MMPI) psychological scales . Clin Exp Rheumatol2002; 20: 677-82.
40.
Voerman G., Sandsjö L., Vollenebroek-Hutten M., Larsman P., Kadefors R., Hermens H.Effects of ambulant training and ergonomic councelling in female computer workers with work-related neck-shoulder complaints: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil2007; 17: 137-52.
41.
Jensen M., Barber J., Romano J. et al. Effects of self-hypnosis training and EMG biofeedback relaxation training on chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury. J Clin Exp Hypnosis2009; 57: 239-68.
42.
Spence S., Sharpe L., Newton-John T., Champion D.Effect of EMG biofeedback compared to applied relaxation training with chronic, upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders. Pain1995; 63: 199-206.
43.
Newton-John TRO , Spence SH, Schotte D.Cognitive-behavioural therapy versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther1995; 33: 691-7.
44.
Mårtensson L.Rehabilitation of persons with chronic pain an approach built on understanding. Doctor’s thesis, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 2005.
45.
Holroyd K., Penzien D., Hursey K. et al. Change mechanisms in EMG biofeedback training: cognitive changes underlying improvements in tension headache. J Consult Clin Psychol1984; 52: 1039-53.
46.
Kerns R., Turk D., Rudy T.The West Haven- Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain1985; 23: 345-56.
47.
Johansson C. , Dahl J., Jannert M., Melin L., Andersson G.Effects of a cognitive-behavioral pain-management program. Behav Res Ther1998; 36: 915-30.
48.
Okifuji A., Turk D., Eveleigh D.Improving the rate of classification of patients with the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI): clarifying the meaning of ‘Significant other.’Clin J Pain1999; 15: 290-6.
49.
Söderlund A., Dennison E.Classification of patients with whiplash associated disorders (WAD): reliable and valid subgroups based on the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S). Eur J Pain2006; 10: 113-19.
50.
Bergström G., Jensen I., Linton S., Nygren Å.A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI-S): a gender differentiated evaluation. Eur J Pain1999; 3: 261-73.
