Dual task interference in estimating the risk of falls and measuring change: a comparative,psychometric study of four measurements

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to examine the validity and reliability of the Timed Up and Go Test with dual task for predicting the risk of falls. Standard values for the TUG with dual task were determined, taking account of age and gender.

Design: Validation study

Setting: Data was recorded for 120 volunteers in an outpatient physiotherapy centre.

Subjects: The sample comprised 120 healthy men and women aged 60 to 87 years living at home. Twenty-three subjects selected at random were tested again, after one day and after one week, in order to ascertain the retest reliability.

Main measures: Berg Balance Scale, times for Timed Up and Go Test with manual dual task (TUGman) and with cognitive dual task (TUGcog).

Results: Strong correlations between the TUGman and the BBS (r = -0.72) and between the TUGcog and the BBS (r = -0.66) indicate high criterion validity. The retest reliability of the TUGman (r_T1-T2 = 0.97 and r_T1-T3 = 0.98) and TUGcog (r_T1-T2 = 0.98 and r_T1-T3 = 0.98) is very good. The intra-rater reliability is very high with an ICC = 0.99 for the TUGman and an ICC = 0.94 for the TUGcog. The mean time needed to perform the TUGman is 11.6 s (95% CI 11.2—11.9); the mean time needed to perform the TUGcog is 9.8 s (95% CI 9.5—10.2).

Conclusions: The tests with dual task can be recommended because they possess high criterion validity and very good retest reliability. Faster and simpler performance of the TUG-DT is another factor in its favour.

References

Gates S. , Fisher JD , Cooke MW , Carter YH , Lamb SE Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008 ; 336: 130-133.

Scott V. , Votova K. , Scanlan A. , Close J. Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings . Age ageing 2007; 36: 130-139.

Boulgarides LK , McGinty SM , Willett JA , Barnes CW Use of clinical and impairment-based tests to predict falls by community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 328-339.

Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege (Hrsg.) Expertenstandard Sturzprophylaxe in der Pflege [Expert standard fall prevention in nursing]. 2006, Osnabrück.

Podsiadlo D. , Richardson S. The timed ‘‘Up & Go’’: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons . J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148.

Shumway-Cook A. , Woollacott M. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M10-M16.

Toulotte C. , Thevenon A. , Watelain E. , Fabre C. Identification of healthy elderly fallers and non-fallers by gait analysis under dual-task conditions. Clin rehab 2006 ; 20: 269-276.

Verghese J. , Buschke H. , Viola L. , Katz M. , Hall C. , Kuslansky G. , Lipton R. Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002 ; 50: 1572-1576.

Nikolaus T. Gang , Gleichgewicht und SturzeFunktionsbeurteilung, Diagnostik und Prävention. [Gait, balance and falls - function assessment, diagnosis and prevention]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2005; 130: 961-964.

10.

Lundin-Olsson L. , Nyberg L. , Gustafson Y. ‘‘Stops walking when talking’’ as a predictor of falls in elderly people . Lancet 1997; 349: 617.

11.

Gulich M. , Zeitler HP [The walking-counting test. A simple test for assessing the risk of falling] . Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2000; 125: 245-248.

12.

Zeitler HP , Gulich M. , Schmidt UM Stürze verhindern und therapieren [Preventing and treating falls] . Hausarzt 2004; 41: 50-53.

13.

Paul SS , Ada L. , Canning CG Automaticity of walking - implications for physiotherapy practice . Phys Ther Rev 2005; 10: 15-23.

14.

Janke O. Verbesserte Automatisierung durch Lernen unter Dual-Task Bedingungen? Zwei Studien mit neurologisch erkrankten Patienten und Normalpersonen [Improved automaticity through learning under dual task conditions? Two studies with neurologically ill patients and normal persons]. Dissertation , 2003.

15.

Pashler H. , Johnston J. , Ruthruff E. Attention and Performance. Annu Rev Psychol 2001; 52: 629-651.

16.

Schädler S. , Kool J. , Lüthi H. Assessments in der Neurorehabilitation. Bern: Huber, 2006.

17.

Muir SW , Berg K. , Chesworth B. , Speechley M. Use of the Berg Balance Scale for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people: a prospective study. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 449-459.

18.

Chiu AYY , Au-Yeung SSY , Lo SK A comparison of four functional tests in discriminating fallers from non-fallers in older people. Disabil rehabil 2003; 25: 45-50.

19.

Lajoie Y. , Girard A. , Guay M. Comparison of the reaction time, the Berg Scale and the ABC in non-fallers and fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002; 35: 215-225.

20.

Steffen TM , Hacker TA , Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 128-137.

21.

Berg KO , Wood-Dauphinee SL , Williams JI , Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992; 83: S7-S11.

22.

Berg K. , Wood-Dauphinee S. , Williams JI , Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument . Physiother Can 1989; 41: 304-311.

23.

Shumway-Cook A. , Gruber W. , Baldwin M. , Liao S. The effect of multidimensional exercises on balance, mobility, and fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther 1997; 77: 46-57.

24.

Kessler J. , Markowitsch HJ , Denzler PE MMST: Mini-Mental-Status-Test. Weinheim: Beltz Test, 1990.

25.

Folstein MF , Folstein SE , McHugh PR ‘‘Minimental state’’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician . J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198.

26.

Dias N. , Kempen G. , Todd C. , Beyer N. , Freiberger E. , Piot-Ziegler C. et al. Die German version der Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I). Z Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 39: 297-300.

27.

Tinetti ME , Baker DI , McAvay G. , Claus EB , Garrett P. , Gottschalk M. et al. A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 821-827.

28.

Yardley L. , Beyer N. , Hauer K. , Kempen G. , Piot-Ziegler C. , Todd C. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age ageing 2005; 34: 614-619.

29.

Scherfer E. , Bohls C. , Freiberger E. , Heise K-F. , Hogan D. Berg-Balance-Scale - deutsche Version. Übersetzung eines Instrumentes zur Beurteilung von Gleichgewicht und Sturzgefährdung . Physioscience 2006; 2: 59-66.

30.

Matthias S. , Nayak US , Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the ‘‘get-up and go’’ test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 387-389.

31.

Eekhof JA , De Bock GH , Schaapveld K. , Springer MP Short report: functional mobility assessment at home. Timed up and go test using three different chairs. Can Fam Physician 2001; 47: 1205-1207.

32.

Shrout PE , Fleiss JL Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-428.

33.

McGraw KO , Wong SP Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1996; 1: 30-46.

34.

Kristensen MT , Foss NB , Kehlet H. Timed ‘‘up & go’’ test as a predictor of falls within 6 months after hip fracture surgery. Phys Ther 2007; 87: 24-30.

35.

Regnaux JP , David D. , Daniel O. , Smail DB , Combeaud D. , Bussel B. Attention during walking: evaluation of automaticity with a dual task paradigm . Archives of Physiology & Biochemistry 2004; Sep Supplement: 71 (AN 17003084).

36.

Bohannon RW Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2006; 29: 64-68.

37.

Shumway-Cook A. , Brauer S. , Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test . Phys Ther 2000; 80: 896-903.

38.

Whitney SL , Marchetti GF , Schade A. , Wrisley DM The sensitivity and specificity of the Timed ‘‘Up & Go’’ and the Dynamic Gait Index for self-reported falls in persons with vestibular disorders’’. J Vestib Res 2004 ; 14: 397-409.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB