Beautiful Thus Innocent? The Impact of Defendants' and Victims' Physical Attractiveness and Participants' Rape Beliefs on Impression Formation in Alleged Rape Cases
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2001
Beautiful Thus Innocent? The Impact of Defendants' and Victims' Physical Attractiveness and Participants' Rape Beliefs on Impression Formation in Alleged Rape Cases
This experiment examined the possible beneficial effects of victims' and defendants' good-looks in an alleged rape case. It was hypothesized that people who especially endorsed ‘Rape Myths’ would be more favourable towards victims and defendants who are good-looking. Moreover, it was hypothesized that females would be more favourable towards the victim than males and that this gender difference would be mediated by differences in “Rape Myths Acceptance”.
In the experiment, 80 observers were exposed to an extract of a victim's story about an alleged rape case. The physical attractiveness of both the victim and the defendant were systematically varied. Observers' Rape Myths Acceptance were measured with Burt's (1980) Rape Myths Acceptance scale. The results support the hypotheses; it is therefore suggested that the acceptance of these myths should be investigated in selection procedures of people who are likely to be confronted with victims of sexual offenses, such as police officers and jury members in rape or sexual harassment cases.
References
1.
AcockA.C.IrelandN.K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.
2.
BensonP.L.KarabenickS.A.LernerR.M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 409–415.
3.
BurtM.R. (1980). Cultural myths and support for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
4.
CalhounL.G.SelbyJ.W.CannA.KellerG.T. (1978). The effects of victim physical attractiveness and sex of respondent on social reactions to victims of rape. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 191–192.
5.
DionK.K.BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
6.
EaglyA.H.AshmoreR.D.MakhijaniM.G.LongoL.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but ... :A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 107–128.
7.
EfranM.G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45–54.
8.
FeingoldA. (1992). Good-looking. people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 429–456
9.
GoldmanW.LewisP. (1977). Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skilful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 125–130.
10.
HatfieldE.SprecherS. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, N.Y.; Suny Press.
11.
HolcombD.R.HolcombL.C.SondagK.A.WilliamsN. (1991). Attitudes about rape: Gender differences among college students. College Student Journal, 25, 434–439.
12.
JenkinsM.J.DambrotF.H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes, sexual experiences, and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–895.
13.
KrahéB. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 460–474.
14.
KrahéB. (1991). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. In European review of social psychology (StroebeW.HewstoneM., eds) volume 2, pp. 279–309. John Wiley and Sons; Chichester.
15.
KulkaR.KesslerJ. (1978). Is justice really blind?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 366–381.
16.
L' ArmandK.PepitoneA. (1982). Judgments of rape: Astudy of victim—rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.
17.
LangloisJ.H.RoggmanL.A.CaseyR.J.RitterJ.M.Riesser-DannerL.A.JenkinsV.Y. (1986). Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudirrlents of a stereotype?Developmental Psychology, 23, 363–369.
18.
MazellaR.FeingoldA. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socio-economic status, and gender of defendants and victims of judgements of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315–1344.
19.
PallakS.R.MurroniE.KochJ. (1983). Communicator attractiveness and expertise, emotional versus rational appeals, and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2, 122–141.
20.
ReisH.T.WheelerL.SpeigelN.KernisM.H.PerriM. (1982). Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 979–996.
21.
RoszellP.KemledyD.GrabbE. (1990). Physical attractiveness and income attaiment among Canadians. Journal of Psychology, 123, 547–559.
22.
SigallH.LandyD. (1973). Radiating beauty: The effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 218–224.
23.
ThorntonB.RobbinsA.JohnsonJ.A. (1981). Social perception of the rape victim's culpability: The influence of respondents' personal-environmental causal attribution tendencies. Human Relations, 35, 225–237.
24.
ThorntonB.RyckmanR.M. (1983). The influence of a rape victim's physical attractiveness on observers' attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 36, 549–562.
25.
UmbersonD.HughesM. (1987). The impact of physical attractiveness on achievement and psychological well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 227–236.
26.
VrijA. (1997). Gender differences in assessments of rape victims reports. Expert Evidence, 5, 61–64.
27.
VrijA.AkehurstL. (1997). The existence of a black clothing stereotype: The impact of a victim's black clothing on impression formation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 3, 227–237.
28.
WardC. (1988). The Attitudes toward Rape Victims Scale: Construction, validation, and cross-cultural applicability. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 127–146.
29.
WinkelF.W.KoppelaarL. (1991). Rape victims' style of self-presentation and secondary victimization by the environment: An experiment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 29–40.
