Poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs) present a recipient country’s program of intent for the utilization of World Bank loans and grants to alleviate debt under the bank’s programs of action for poverty reduction in highly indebted poor countries (HIPCs). This article argues that structural transformation is a prerequisite for poverty reduction in Zambia. However, the Zambian PRSP is largely informed by mainstream thinking on poverty and livelihoods. It champions a neoliberal program constructed on the sanctity of the market and seeks to maintain the very structural processes that engender poverty. Because it fails to break, conceptually and methodologically, from past program failures, the PRSP is likely to be just the latest installment in the ever-changing fashionable semantics of the “development community.” The article examines the conceptual and methodological failures of the Zambian PRSP particularly with respect to the measurement of poverty and the concept of participation.
Allen, T., & Thomas, A. (2000). Poverty and development in the 1990s. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
Ashley C. (2000). Applying livelihoods approaches to natural resource management initiatives: Experiences in Namibia and Kenya. London: Chameleon Press.
3.
Ayupan, L., & Oliveros, T. (1993). Filipino peasant women in defence of life. In V. Shiva (Ed.), Close to home: Women reconnect ecology, health and development (pp 113-120). Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
4.
Baker, J. (2000). Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: World Bank.
5.
Booth, B. (Ed.). (2003). Are PRSPs making a difference? The African experience [Special issue]. Development Policy Review, 21(2).
6.
Bwalya, M. (1984). Participation or powerlessness: The place of peasants in Zambia’s rural development. In K. Woldring (Ed.), Beyond political independence: Zambia’s development predicament in the 1980s (pp 73-87). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.
7.
Carney, D. (1997). Sustainable rural livelihoods: What contributions can we make?London: U.K. Department for International Development.
8.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts: Putting the last first. London: IT Publications.
9.
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 36-55). London: Zed Books.
10.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny?London: Zed Books.
11.
Erdmann, G., & Simutanyi, N. (2003). Transition in Zambia: The hybridisation of the Third Republic. Lilongwe, Germany: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
12.
Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp 6-25). London: Zed Books.
13.
Ferguson. J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: Development, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Gills, M., Radelet, S., Snodgrass, D. R., Roemer, M., & Perkins, D. H. (1992). Economics of development (3rd ed.). London: Norton.
15.
Government of Zambia. (1990-2002a). Economic report. Lusaka: Author, Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
16.
Government of Zambia. (1998). Living conditions monitoring survey. Lusaka: Author, Central Statistical Office.
17.
Government of Zambia. (2002b). Poverty reduction strategy paper. Lusaka: Author, Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
18.
Government of Zambia. (2004). Budget speech. Lusaka: Author, Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
19.
Hailey, J. (2001). Beyond the formulaic: Process and practice in south Asian NGOs.In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 88-101). London: Zed Books.
20.
Hildyard, N., Hegde, P., Wolvekamp, P., & Reddy, S. (2001). Pluralism, participation and power: Joint forest management in India. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 56-72). London: Zed Books.
21.
Howard, W., & Killick, T. (2001). African poverty at the millennium: Causes, complexities and challenges. Washington, DC: World Bank.
22.
Imboela, B. (2004). The political economy of the local: An inquiry into the causes of rural livelihoods vulnerability in developing countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark.
23.
James, H. (2000). The globalization syndrome: Transformation and resistance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
James, H., & Ashiwini, T. (2000). Global poverty and gender. In H. James (Ed.), The globalization syndrome: Transformation and resistance (pp 74-90). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Kortern, A. (1994). Fifty years is enough: Structural adjustment and Costa Rican agriculture. In K. Donahue (Ed.), Fifty years is enough (pp. 56-61). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
26.
Lensink, R. (1996). Structural adjustment in sub-Saharan Africa. London: Longman.
27.
Mkandawire, T., & Soludo, C. C. (1999). Our continent, our future: African perspectives on structural adjustment. Trenton, NJ: African World Press.
28.
Murray, C. (2000). Changing livelihoods: The free state, 1990s. African Studies, 59(1), 115-142.
29.
Murray, C. (2002). Livelihoods research: Transcending the boundaries of time and space. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28(3), 489-509.
30.
O’Connor, J. (1989). Uneven and combined development and ecological crisis: A theoretical introduction. Race and Class, 30(3), 1-11.
31.
Orjiako, H. (2001). Killing sub-Saharan Africa with aid. New York: Nova Science.
32.
Peet, R., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (1996a). Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. New York: Routledge.
33.
Peet, R., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (1996b). Liberation ecology: Development sustainability and environment in an age of market triumphalism. In R. Peet & M. Watts (Eds.), Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements (pp. 1-46). New York: Routledge.
34.
Redclift, M. (1987). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. New York: Methuen.
35.
Shiva, V. (Ed.). (1994). Close to home: Women reconnect ecology, health and development worldwide. Philadelphia: New Society.
36.
Stephen, C. (Ed.). (1988). Africa’s development challenges and the World Bank: Hard questions, costly choicesBoulder, CO: Lynne. Rienner.
37.
Cornia, G. A., Jolly, R., & Stewart, F. (Eds.). (1987). Adjustment with a human face: Protecting the vulnerable and promoting growth. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
38.
Tangiri, R. (1985). Politics in sub-Saharan Africa. London: James Currey.
39.
United Nations Development Program. (2003). Human development report. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Whitehead, A. (2002). Tracking livelihood change: Theoretical, methodological and empirical perspectives from north-east Ghana. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28(3), 575-598.
41.
World Bank. (1981). Towards accelerated development in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
World Bank. (1997). Taking action to reduce poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: Author.
