Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology have become a hot topic of public debates in many countries because both revolutionary changes and strong public concerns are expected from its development. Because nanotechnology is, at this point, mostly articulated in visionary and futuristic terms, it is difficult to apply standard methods of technology assessment and even more difficult to consider it in engineering ethics courses. In this article, the authors suggest using selected science fiction stories in the engineering ethics classroom to provide students with ethical skills and cultural knowledge required for engaging in public debates and for responsible decision making. Against the background of general debates on teaching engineering ethics, they do so by discussing the advantages and possible drawbacks of this approach and by presenting two examples of nano-science fiction classics.
Baird, D., Nordmann, A., & Schummer, J. (Eds.). (2004). Discovering the nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2.
Bear, G. (1985). Blood music. London: Orion.
3.
Committee on Technology. (2002). National Nanotechnology Initiative: The initiative and its implementation plan. Washington, DC: National Science and Technology Council.
4.
Committee on Technology. (2003). National Nanotechnology Initiative: Research and development supporting the next industrial revolution: Supplement to the president’s FY 2004 budget. Washington, DC: National Science and Technology Council.
5.
Crichton, M. (2002). Prey. New York: HarperCollins.
6.
Davis, M. (1999). Teaching ethics across the engineering curriculum. Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/essays/education/davis.html
7.
Flynn, M. (1991a). The nanotech chronicles. Riverdale, NY: Baen.
8.
Flynn, M. (1991b). (First published in Analog magazine, June and July 1989) (The washer at the ford. In The nanotech chronicles (pp. 21-168). Riverdale, NY: Baen.
9.
Hawthorne, N. (1844). Rappaccini’s daughter. United States Magazine and Democratic Review, 15, 545-560.
10.
Herkert, J. R. (1997). Collaborative learning in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 447-462.
11.
Herkert, J. R. (2000). ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000 and engineering ethics: Where do we go from here? Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/essays/education/herhert2.html
12.
Herkert, J. R. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge: National Academy of Engineering, 32(3), 8-13. Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/NAE/naehome.nsf/weblinks/MKEZ-5F7SA4?OpenDocument
13.
Integrating ethics into engineering education and practice [Special issue]. (2004). Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2).
14.
Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. E. (1988). The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
Landon, B. (1997). Science fiction after 1900: From the steam man to the stars. New York: Twayne.
16.
Landon, B. (2004). Less is more: Much less is much more: The insistent allure of nanotechnology narratives in science fiction. In N. K. Hayles (Ed.), Nanoculture: Implications of the new technoscience (pp. 131-146). Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
17.
Lincourt, J., & Johnson, R. (2004). Ethics training: A genuine dilemma for engineering educators. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 353-358.
18.
Loui, M. C. (2000). Fieldwork and cooperative learning in professional ethics. Teaching Philosophy, 23(2), 139-156. Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/essays/education/loui.html
19.
Milburn, C. (2002). Nanotechnology in the age of post-human engineering: Science fiction as science. Configurations, 10, 261-295.
20.
Napier, A. S. (2004). Nanotechnology in science fiction. Retrieved June 28, 2004, from http://www.geocities.com/asnapier/nano/n-sf/books.html
21.
Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 343-351.
22.
Pritchard, M. S. (Ed.). (1992). Teaching engineering ethics: A case study approach. Center for the Study of Ethics in Society, Western Michigan University. Retrieved from http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm
23.
Pritchard, M. S., & Goldfarb, T. (1995). Ethics issues from science fiction. In Incorporating ethics in classroom science lessons(Lesson 14). Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/edu/precol/classroom/
24.
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2001). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology(Proceedings of a workshop organized by the National Science Foundation, September 28-29, 2000). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25.
Roco, M. C., & Tomellini, R. (Eds.). (2002). Nanotechnology: Revolutionary opportunities and societal implications(3rd EC-NSF Workshop on Nanotechnology, Lecce, Italy, January 31-February 1). Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
26.
Schummer, J. (2001). Ethics of chemical synthesis. Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 7, 103-124.
27.
Schummer, J. (2004a). Interdisciplinary issues of nanoscale research. In D. Baird, A. Nordmann, & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale (pp. 9-20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
28.
Schummer, J. (2004b). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59, 425-465.
29.
Schummer, J. (2004c). Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology: Meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(2), 56-87.
30.
Schummer, J. (2005). Reading nano: The public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in book purchase patterns. Public Understanding of Science, 14(2), 163-183.
31.
Schummer, J. (in press). Historical roots of the “mad scientist”: Chemists in 19th-century literature. Ambix.
32.
and Techne: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(2-3).
33.
Shelley, M. (1831). Frankenstein, or the modern prometheus (2nd ed.). London: Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor & Jones. (Original work published 1818)
34.
Stephenson, N. (1995). The diamond age; or, a young lady’s illustrated primer. New York: Bantam.
35.
Sweeney, A. E., Seal, S., & Vaidyanathan, P. (2003). The promises and perils of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Exploring emerging social and ethical issues. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4), 236-245.
36.
Weckert, J. (2001). The control of scientific research: The case of nanotechnology. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 3, 29-44.
37.
Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299-308. Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/essays/education/teaching.html
38.
Whitbeck, C. (1996). Problems and cases: New directions in ethics 1980-1996. Professional Ethics, 5(3), 3-16. Retrieved from http://onlineethics.org/essays/education/probcase.html
39.
Wolfson, J. R. (2003). Social and ethical issues in nanotechnology: Lessons from biotechnology and other high technologies. Biotechnology Law Report, 22(4), 376-396.
