The lifecycle concept is a “cradle to grave” approach to thinking about products, processes, and services, recognizing that all stages have environmental and economic impacts. Any rigorous and meaningful comparison of energy supply options must be done using a lifecycle analysis approach. It has been applied to an increasing number of conventional and renewable energy generation systems and in an increasing range of countries. There is now a good amount of research reporting the lifecycle environmental and economic aspects of power generation systems. This article reviews the existing lifecycle analyses of renewable energy systems to determine the current understanding of their full lifecycle impacts. These are then compared with each other and those of conventional power generation systems. The renewable energy systems reviewed include wind, solar photovoltaic, solar thermal (for electricity), hydroelectric, solid biomass, wave, geothermal, biogas, and tidal. The article also highlights the areas where more lifecycle analysis is needed.
Biswas, W.K., Barton, L., & Carter, D. (2007, May). Life cycle global warming potential of wheat production in Western Australia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Climate Change, Hong Kong.
2.
Boyd, S., & Dornfeld, D.A. (2005). Technology choices for the PV Industry: A comparative life cycle assessment. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Green Manufacturing Group.
3.
Carpentieri, M., Corti, A., & Lombardi, L. (2005). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle (IBGCC) with CO2 removal. Energy Conservation and Management, 46, 1790-1808.
4.
Dones, R., Heck, T., & Hirschberg, S. (2003). Greenhouse gas emissions from energy systems: Comparison and overview. Villigen , Switzerland: Paul Scherrer Institut.
5.
ExternE. (1997). ExternE National Implementation. Available from the ExternE Web site, http://externe.jrc.es/reports.html
6.
Fthenakis, V.M. (2004). Life cycle impact analysis of cadmium in CdTe PV production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 303-334.
7.
Fthenakis, V.M. (2006, September). Environmental impacts of PV electricity generation-A critical comparison of energy supply options. Paper presented at the 21st Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference , Dresden, Germany.
8.
Fthenakis, V.M., Alsema, E.A., & De Wilde Scholten, M.J. (2005, January). Life cycle assessment of photovoltaics: Perceptions, needs, and challenges. Paper presented at the 31st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference , Orlando, FL.
9.
Greadel, T., & Allenby, B. (2003a). An introduction to life cycle assessment. In Industrial ecology (2nd ed., pp. 183-196). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Greadel, T., & Allenby, B. (2003b). The LCA impact and interpretation stages. In Industrial ecology (2nd ed., pp. 197-213). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Heller, M.C., & Keoleian, G.A. (2003). Volk TA. Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass and Energy , 25, 147-165.
12.
International Energy Agency. (2000). Hydropower and the environment: Present context and guidelines for future action (Subtask 5 report). Paris: Author.
13.
International Energy Agency. (2003). The future role of CO2 capture and storage results of the IEA-ETP model (IEA/EET working paper). Paris: Author.
14.
Jungmeier, G., Resch, G., & Spitzer, J. (1998). Environmental burdens over the entire life cycle of a biomass CHP plant. Biomass and Energy, 15(4-5), 311-323.
15.
Kannan, R., Leong, K.C., Osman, R., Ho, H.K., & Tso, C.P. (2006). Life cycle assessment study of solar PV systems : An example of a 27 kWp .distributed solar PV system in Singapore. Solar Energy, 80, 555-563.
16.
Khan, F.I., Howboldt, K., & Iqbal, M.T. (2005). Life cycle analysis of wind-fuel integrated system . Renewable Energy, 30, 157-177.
17.
Krauter, S., & Ruther, R. (2004). Considerations for the calculation of greenhouse gas reduction by photovoltaic solar energy. Renewable Energy , 29, 345-355.
18.
Lankey, R.L., & McMichael, M.C. (2000). Life-cycle methods for comparing primary and rechargeable batteries. Environmental Science and Technologies, 34, 2299-2304.
19.
Lee, K.M., Lee, S.Y., & Hur, T. (2004). Life cycle inventory analysis for electricity in Korea. Energy, 29, 87-101.
20.
Lenzen, M., & Munksgaard, J. (2002). Energy and CO2 life cycle analysis of wind turbines-Review and applications. Renewable Energy, 26, 339-362.
21.
Mann, M.K., & Spath, P.L. (2000). A summary of life cycle assessment studies conducted on biomass, coal, and natural gas systems. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
22.
Mann, M.K., & Spath, P.L. (2001). A life cycle assessment of biomass co-firing in a coal fired power plant. Clean Production Process, 3, 81-91.
23.
Matsuhashi, R., Hikita, K., & Ishitani, H. (1996). Model analysis for sustainable energy supply taking resource and environmental constraints into consideration. Energy Conservation and Management, 37(6-8), 1253-1258.
24.
Matthews, R.W., & Mortimer, N.D. (2000). Estimation of carbon dioxide and energy budgets of wood-fired electricity generation systems in Britain . IEA Bioenergy 2000, 25, 59-78.
25.
Meier, P.J. (2000). Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation. systems and applications for climate change. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
26.
Schleisner, L. (2000). Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities. Renewable Energy, 20, 279-288.
27.
Sorensen, B. (2005, July). Life cycle analysis of present and future based solar cells. Paper presented at the 2nd Photovoltaic World Conference, Vienna, Austria.
28.
Spath, P.L., & Mann, M.K. (2000). Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined cycle power generation system (NREL/ TP-570-27715). Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
29.
Spath, P.L., Mann, M.K., & Kerr, D.R. (1999). Life cycle of coal fired power (NREL/TP-570-25119) . Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
30.
Spath, P.L., & Margaret, L.S. (1999). Capturing and sequestering CO2 from a coal fired power plant-Assessing the net energy and greenhouse gas emissions. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
31.
World Energy Council. (2004). Comparison of energy systems using lifecycle analysis. London: Author.
32.
White, S.W., & Kulcinski, G.L. (1999). Net energy payback and CO2 emissions from wind generated electricity in the Midwest. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
33.
World Wildlife Fund. (2005a). Improve EU emission trading system to meet Kyoto target. Available from the World Wildlife Fund Web site, http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_we_do/climate_change/news/index.cfm?uNewsID=50480
34.
World Wildlife Fund. (2005b). Marine renewable energy for the UK. Available from the World Wildlife Fund Web site, http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/marine_renewable_energy.pdf
