NakayamaG., “Reform of School Science Curriculum for the 21st Century: Science-Technology-Society Theme in Japanese Conext.” Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Annual Meeting, ED292668, pp. 1-40, 1988.
McCurdyD.W. and StrasenburgA.A., “A United States of Education in Japan.” Journal of College Science Teaching15 (5), 478-481 (1986).
4.
BennettW.J., “Japanese Education Today.” A Report from the U.S. Study of Education in Japan. Prepared by a Special Task Force of the OERI Japan Study Team, pp. 1-103, 1987.
5.
JacobsonW.J.S., TakemuraR.L.DoranS.KojimaE. Humrich and MiyakeM., “Analyses and Comparisons of Science Curricula in Japan and the U.S.” Second IEA Science Study, ED271395, pp. 1-106 (1987).
6.
YagerR.E. and PenickJ.E., “Resolving the Crisis in Science Education: Understanding Before Resolution.” Science Education71(1) 49-55 (1987).
7.
KyleW.C., What Became of the Curriculum Development Projects of the 1960's? How Effective Were They? What Did we Learn from Them That will Help Teachers in Today's Classrooms? Reseach within Reach, Science Education pp. 3-24, 1985.
8.
Environmental Education Act of 1970: Public Law 95-516. Congressional RecordOct. 30, 1970.
9.
HarmsC.N. and YagerR.E., What Research Says to the Science Teachers, Vol. III. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association, ED205367, 1981.
10.
Education for Economic Security Act of 1984: Public Law 98-377. Congressional RecordAugust 11, 1984.
11.
HodsonD., “Experiments in Science and Science Teaching.” Educational Philosophy & Theory20 (2), 53-66 (1988).
12.
FinleyN.F., “Science Processes.” Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching20(1) 47-54 (1983).
13.
WallaceB.A., Choosing Reality. New Science Library, Boston, MA, 1989.
14.
OsborneR. and WittrockM.C., “The Generative Learning Model and Its Implications for Science Education.” Studies in Science Education, 12., 59-87 (1985).
15.
RichardsS., “The New Sociology of Science. Chapter 9 in Philosophy and Sociology of Science. Basil Blackwell New York, pp. 197-224, 1988.
16.
YagerR.E. and PenickJ.E., “Changes in Perceived Attutides Toward the Goals for Science Instruction in Schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching25(3), 179-184 (1988).
17.
YagerR.E. and PenickJ.E., “Perceptions of Four Age Groups Toward Science Classes, Teachers, and the Value of Science.” Science Education70 (4), 355-363 (1986).
18.
YagerR.E., SimmonsP.E. and PenickJ.E., “Student Perception of the Usefulness of School Science Experiences.” School Science and Mathematics89 (4), 313-319 (1989).
19.
YagerR.E., GrahamC.S.HarknessJ.L., LangM.G.MastersM.L. and MaxwellE.D., “Science/Technology/Society: A New Effort for Providing Appropriate Science for All.” The NSTA Position Statement on Science/Technology/Society (STS)1989.
20.
Provisional Council on Educational Reform, “First Report on Educational Reform.” Government of Japan, pp. 1-2, 1985.
21.
National Council on Education Reform, “Summary of Second Report on Educational Reform.” Government of Japan, pp. 1-8, 1986.
22.
RyuT., “Developments in High School Physics Teaching in Japan.” Physics Education23 (4), 218-223 (1988).
23.
ZieglerR.J., “An American Principal Examines Japan's Schools.” Principal66 (1), 34-36 (1986).
24.
OhtaT., “Problems and Perspectives in Japanese Education.” Comparative Education22 (1), 27-30 (1986).
25.
KirstM.W., “Japanese Education: Its Implications for Economic Competition in the 1980s.” Phil Delta Kappan62 (10), 707-708 (1981).
26.
McintoshW.J. and ZeidlerE.L., “Teachers' Conceptions of the Contemporary Goals of Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching25 (2), 93-102 (1988).
27.
RutherfordJ.F.., Science for All Americans: Project 2061. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 1989.
28.
YagerR.E., “A New Focus for School Science: S/T/S.” School Science and Mathematics88 (3), 181-189 (1988).
KromhoutR. and GoodR., “Beware of Societal Issues as Organizers for Science Education.” School Science and Mathematics83 (8), 647-650 (1983).
31.
GoodR., HerronD.J.LawsonA.E. and RennerJ.W., “The Domain of Science Education.” Science Education69(2), 39-41(1985).
32.
ShindoK., “Formation of Student's Character and Sense of Values in Science Education.” Science Education Monthly39 (1), 8-11 (1990).
33.
MatsuoT., “Fields and Methods to Form Rational Sense of Values in Science Education.” Science Education Monthly39 (1), 16-19 (1990).
34.
GraysonL.P., “Japan's Intellectual Challenge: The Strategy.” Engineering Education74(3) 138-146 (1984).
35.
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, National Course of Study for Upper Secondary Schools. Government of Japan pp. 1-49, 1982.
36.
AntonoplosD.P., “Japan: Educationally Relevant Generalizations and Inherent Research Biases. U.S. Study Group of Education in Japan ED279560, pp. 1-15, 1986.
Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, National Course of Study for Upper Secondary Schools. Government of Japan pp. 1-45 (1989).
39.
TakemuraS., “A View from Japan on How to Improve Science Education and Teacher Competencies.” Paper presented at the NSTA National Convention, pp. 1-39 (1990).
40.
McComasW.F. and YagerR.E., The Iowa Assessment Package for Evaluation in Five Domains of Science Education. Science Education Center, The University of Iowa1989.