Abstract
The brain is an energetically demanding organ that relies on a continuous and precisely regulated blood supply to sustain neuronal function. This regulation is achieved through an intricate vascular network and sophisticated control mechanisms that dynamically match cerebral blood flow (CBF) to local metabolic demands. Central to this process is the neurovascular unit (NVU), a multicellular ensemble composed of endothelial cells, mural cells, astrocytes, neurons, microglia, and extracellular matrix components. Through coordinated interactions, the NVU governs vascular tone, blood–brain barrier integrity, and metabolic exchange. In this Review, we first describe the structural organization of the cerebrovascular tree and the specialized features of its cellular constituents. We then examine the principal mechanisms controlling CBF, including neurovascular coupling, cerebrovascular autoregulation, and endothelial regulation of vascular tone, highlighting the underlying molecular and cellular pathways. Emphasis is placed on mechanistic insights derived from experimental animal models, which have been fundamental for dissecting the basic biology of neurovascular regulation. Finally, we discuss how disruption of these regulatory systems contributes to cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, including hypertension and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), primarily drawing on preclinical evidence.
Keywords
Introduction
The brain is the most complex and metabolically demanding organ of the body, consuming ~20% of the body’s oxygen despite accounting for only about 2% of its mass. 1 Because it lacks significant energy reserves, proper brain function depends on a continuous blood supply delivered through an extensive vascular network, 2 such that every cell lies within 15 µm of the nearest microvessel. 3 The cerebral vasculature is tightly regulated, structurally specialized, and functionally integrated with surrounding neural and glial cells, and it is governed by sophisticated neurovascular regulatory mechanisms that precisely match blood delivery to the brain’s spatially and temporally diverse metabolic demands. 4 Together, these mechanisms ensure the adequate supply of energy substrates and nutrients while facilitating the efficient removal of metabolic waste and other by-products of neural activity. 4
Central to cerebrovascular function is the neurovascular unit (NVU), which comprises endothelial cells (ECs), vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), pericytes, astrocytes, neurons, microglia, and extracellular matrix components. ECs line cerebral vessels and form the blood–brain barrier (BBB) through tight junctions, low rates of transcytosis, and selective transport systems. 5 In addition, cerebral ECs are critical regulators of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and modulate vascular inflammation and blood clotting. 5 Mural cells, including pericytes and VSMCs, regulate the diameter of cerebral vessels, thereby enabling the control of CBF across different vascular segments. 6 Pericytes also play a central role in maintaining BBB integrity. 7 Astrocytes are major components of the NVU and perform several essential functions for normal brain physiology; they maintain ion and water homeostasis, recycle neurotransmitters, contribute to BBB formation and maintenance, provide metabolic support to neurons, and modulate CBF. 8 Finally, recent evidence indicates that microglia, the primary resident immune cell population of the brain, may also play a role in CBF regulation.9–11
In this review, we first describe the structural organization of the cerebrovascular tree, then discuss the principal mechanisms regulating CBF, including neurovascular coupling, cerebrovascular autoregulation, and endothelial regulation of vascular tone, emphasizing mechanistic evidence derived mainly from animal studies. Finally, we examine how dysfunction of these mechanisms contributes to disease, with particular attention on hypertension and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), viewed largely through the lens of experimental models.
Cerebrovascular architecture
The brain receives its blood supply from the paired internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and the vertebrobasilar system, which contribute ~70% and 30% of CBF, respectively. The vertebral arteries arise from the subclavian arteries and merge to form the basilar artery, which subsequently bifurcates into the posterior cerebral arteries (PCAs). The PCAs connect with the ICAs to form a ring-shaped anastomosis at the base of the brain known as the circle of Willis. 4 A key function of this structure is to safeguard against ischemia by enabling collateral redistribution of blood when a major vessel becomes narrowed or occluded. The ICAs also give rise to the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) and connect anteriorly to form the two anterior cerebral arteries (ACAs). From these large arteries, blood is distributed along the brain surface through pial arteries, that are situated within the subarachnoid space and possess multiple layers of VSMCs separated from the endothelium by a prominent elastic lamina (Figure 1). 4 Pial arteries branch extensively to give rise to penetrating arteries that descend perpendicularly into the brain parenchyma, where they supply discrete territories of cortical and subcortical tissue. Penetrating arteries are surrounded by an extension of the subarachnoid space known as the perivascular space, a virtual space delimited by the vascular basement membrane and the glia limitans, also referred to as the Virchow–Robin space (Figure 1). As these vessels transition into penetrating arterioles, the VSMC layer becomes progressively thinner, ultimately forming a single layer. 4 With deeper penetration into the brain parenchyma, the glial membrane and vascular basement membrane fuse, resulting in the obliteration of the perivascular space. Intraparenchymal arterioles possess a single or discontinuous layer of VSMCs, lack perivascular innervation, and are ensheathed by astrocytic endfeet (Figure 1). 4 Endothelial cells extend protrusions through the basement membrane into the smooth muscle layer, forming myoendothelial projections that are enriched in gap junctions. 12 In some instances, axonal terminals or dendrites are observed in close apposition to the vascular basement membrane, typically separated by an intervening glial leaflet. As intraparenchymal arterioles give way to precapillary arterioles, VSMCs are replaced by pericytes, which become the predominant mural cell type. 6 Intraparenchymal arterioles further branch into a dense capillary network that spread throughout nearly every region of the brain, ensuring that most neurons are located within a few micrometers of a capillary (Figure 1), 3 thereby minimizing the diffusion distance for oxygen and metabolites and enabling rapid metabolic exchange. Capillaries branch steeply from intraparenchymal arterioles and form a hierarchical network, with an average of seven branches connecting penetrating arterioles to draining venules. 13

Schematic representation of the cerebrovascular tree. Pial arteries, located in the subarachnoid space, feature a thick layer of VSMCs, separated from the endothelium by an internal elastic lamina. As penetrating arterioles descend into the brain parenchyma, they are surrounded by a perivascular space that contains border-associated macrophages. At the level of intraparenchymal arterioles, the vascular and glial basement membranes fuse, rendering the perivascular space a virtual compartment. Distal to arterioles, VSMCs are replaced by pericytes, which exhibit a gradual morphological transition from ensheathing to mesh to thin-strand phenotypes. The segment between the penetrating arteriole and fourth-order capillaries, referred to as the arteriole-capillary transition zone, plays a critical role in regulating blood flow distribution into and within the capillary network. 13 Capillaries consist of endothelial cells surrounded by pericytes, which are fully enclosed by the basement membrane; both cell types are in direct contact with astrocytic endfeet. The proximal vascular tree and capillary segments receive innervation from local neurons, targeting VSMCs, astrocytes, and pericytes, respectively. Microglial processes are also in direct contact with capillaries and occasionally with endothelial cells.
Neurovascular coupling
Neurovascular coupling (NVC) is the mechanism that enables precise spatial and temporal coordination between neuronal activity and changes in CBF, such that blood flow increases in regions of heightened neural activity and decreases in less active areas. 4 NVC is essential for maintaining the homeostasis of the cerebral microenvironment by ensuring the delivery of energy substrates required to initiate and sustain neuronal activity, while facilitating the removal of potentially toxic by-products of brain metabolism. 4 Beyond metabolic support, accumulating evidence suggests that NVC may serve additional functions that vary across brain regions, reflecting anatomical and functional heterogeneity along the cerebrovascular tree. 14
Two conceptual models have historically been invoked to explain activity-dependent increases in CBF: the “feedback” model and the “feedforward” model. 4 In the “feedback model,” metabolic by-products of neuronal activity, including potent vasodilators such as adenosine, carbon dioxide (CO2), H+, and lactate, drive the increase in blood flow. 4 Among these mediators, CO2 has been widely considered as a particularly plausible candidate because its production rises in parallel with neuronal activity and because its potent vasodilatory effects. 15 However, experimental evidence supporting a primary role for CO2 in initiating NVC remains inconsistent.16,17 Although hypercapnia robustly dilates cerebral vessels, it remains debated whether physiologically relevant fluctuations in CO2 are sufficient to account for the rapid onset and spatial precision of functional hyperemia. Indeed, studies directly assessing CO2 involvement in stimulus-evoked responses have yielded conflicting results.16,17 Oxygen-dependent feedback has also been proposed as a driver of NVC. In acutely prepared anesthetized animals, sensory stimulation induces transient local decreases in pO2, the timing of which is consistent with a triggering role in NVC.18–22 However, experiments in awake animals frequently failed to detect a comparable pO2 reduction, raising concerns about the influence of anesthesia on earlier observations. 23 Moreover, the magnitude of stimulus-evoked CBF increases typically exceeds the metabolic demand of the activated tissue, resulting in excess O2 delivery that may not be energetically necessary.24–26 This overcompensation argues against a model where the tissue’s metabolic state drives the CBF increase. Consistent with this interpretation, physiological manipulations of O2 or glucose availability do not proportionally alter the magnitude of the CBF response,27–29 indicating that acute substrate depletion is unlikely to serve as the primary driver of the hyperemic response. 30 Nonetheless, more recent work has revived the idea that changes in pO2 may contribute to NVC. 31 Microinjection of O2 scavengers can induce capillary hyperemia even in the absence of overt neural activation. 31 One proposed explanation is that reductions in intravascular O2 alter red blood cell deformability, thereby improving microvascular rheology and increasing capillary flow independently of classical vasodilatory pathways. 31 While intriguing, this mechanism does not readily explain the tight spatial coupling between synaptic activation and upstream arteriolar dilation and therefore may represent a modulatory rather than primary process.
Taken together, current evidence indicates that although metabolic factors can influence cerebrovascular tone, particularly during sustained activation, the initial phase of functional hyperemia is more consistent with a “feedforward” signaling model. In this model, neuronal activity drives vascular signaling before metabolic deficits emerge. Glutamatergic transmission triggers neuronal calcium influx and the rapid generation of vasoactive messengers, which act across a coordinated cellular network within the neurovascular unit. 4 Among these mediators, neuronal nitric oxide (NO) has the strongest experimental support as a key contributor to the early phase of the hyperemic response, 32 while additional pathways involving astrocytes and endothelial cells refine, propagate, and spatially shape the signal. Thus, NVC is best conceptualized as a rapid feedforward process initiated by neuronal signaling and distributed across multiple vascular segments through dynamic interactions among distinct cellular components. 4 Defining the relative contribution of these pathways remains an active area of investigation. In the following section, we examine in greater detail the specific feedforward pathways and cellular interactions that mediate activity-dependent increases in CBF.
Neuronal signaling mechanisms
Neuronal activity initiates NVC through a variety of parallel signals that engage different cellular targets within the neurovascular unit. These include direct modulation of vascular tone via diffusible messengers and specialized junctions, as well as indirect pathways that recruit astrocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, and microglia, each of which is addressed in detail in subsequent sections. Briefly, although still debated, glutamate released during synaptic activity may act on astrocytic metabotropic glutamate receptors, triggering intracellular Ca2+ elevations and the subsequent production of vasoactive mediators. 33 Glutamate may also directly influence vascular tone by acting on NMDA receptors expressed on both VSMCs 34 and ECs.35,36 ATP released by activated neurons can activate purinergic receptors on astrocytes, leading in turn to prostaglandin production and vasodilation via pericytes. 37 Adenosine, produced by the breakdown of extracellular ATP, can act directly on VSMCs via adenosine receptors 38 or activate KATP channels on ECs and pericytes. 39 The release of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-derived prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) from pyramidal neurons has also been proposed as a mechanism by which these cells contribute to NVC.40,41 Finally, ionic changes evoked by neuronal activity, particularly increases in extracellular K+, are critical for initiating endothelium-dependent, retrogradely propagated vasodilation, a key component of the CBF response. 42
However, the most characterized mechanism by which neurons appear to modulate CBF is through the release of nitric oxide (NO). Activation of postsynaptic NMDA and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors, leading to elevations in cytoplasmic Ca2+ driven by Ca2+ influx through ion channels and Ca2+ release from internal stores. The resulting rise in cytosolic Ca2+ activates Ca2+-dependent enzymes, most prominently neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which produce potent vasodilators, namely NO and prostanoids, respectively. 4 NO is uniquely suited to serve as a rapid initiator of functional hyperemia. As a membrane-permeant gas, NO diffuses across cellular membranes to reach VSMCs, where it activates soluble guanylyl cyclase, elevates intracellular cGMP levels, and promotes relaxation through reduction of intracellular Ca2+ and desensitization of the contractile apparatus 43 (Figure 2). A recent systematic analysis of pharmacological and genetic manipulations targeting proposed NVC signaling pathways identified nNOS-derived NO as the most critical mediator for the development of the neurovascular response. 32 Optogenetic stimulation of interneurons evokes larger vasodilation than stimulation of pyramidal neurons,44–48 suggesting that a relatively small subset of neurons plays a disproportionately prominent role in regulating vascular tone. Among interneurons, the stimulation of those expressing nNOS produces robust increases in blood flow and vasodilation,48–51 further underscoring that neuron-derived NO is a key regulator of NVC. However, the contribution of NO to NVC is region-specific. In the cerebellum, functional hyperemia is profoundly attenuated in nNOS knockout mice,52–54 indicating a dominant role for neuronal NO. In contrast, cortical and hippocampal responses are only partially reduced,54–57 suggesting that NO function as modulatory or permissive factor rather than the sole initiator factor in these regions. 57 Thus, while NO represents a critical initiator of NVC, its relative contribution varies across brain regions.

Mechanisms of neurovascular coupling at the arteriolar level. Activation of NMDARs in postsynaptic neurons leads to an increase in intracellular Ca2+, which in turn activates neuronal NO synthase, promoting the synthesis and release of NO. NO then activates sGC in VSMCs, resulting in increased cGMP levels and VSMC relaxation. Glutamate released by activated neurons may also activate NMDARs expressed on the abluminal side of ECs, leading to increased Ca2+ levels, activation of endothelial NO synthase, and subsequent VSMC relaxation. Glutamate released at the NsMJs activates NMDA on VSMCs, causing Ca2+ influx, activation of BKCa channels, VSMC hyperpolarization, and relaxation. Increased Ca2+ levels in astrocytes induces the release of arachidonic acid, which is converted to PGE2 and EETs, both of which act on VSMCs to promote relaxation. ATP released by activated neurons is converted to ADP by the ectonucleotidase CD39 in microglia; ADP is then further converted to adenosine, which acts on A2R on VSMCs, inducing relaxation. Endothelial retrograde hyperpolarization is propagated through gap junctions connecting ECs to upstream segments of the cerebrovascular tree and may also hyperpolarize VSMCs via gap junctions at myoendothelial junctions. Dashed lines indicate pathways for which evidence is limited.
Beyond its direct vasodilatory action, NO also exerts important regulatory effects on arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism. NO suppresses the synthesis of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), a potent vasoconstrictor derived from AA that inhibits large-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channels (BKCa) in VSMCs. 58 During neuronal activation, NO may therefore appear necessary both to restrain this constrictor pathway and to offset inhibitory effects of 20-HETE on BKCa channels. 58 By limiting 20-HETE synthesis, NO may also facilitate vasodilation mediated by other AA-derived factors, including epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs), which activate BKCa channels, promote membrane hyperpolarization and enhance VSMCs relaxation. 58 Collectively, these observations exemplify how, in certain brain regions, NO appears to function as a permissive mediator within the neurovascular signaling network, modulating the balance between vasoconstrictor and vasodilatory pathways rather than serving as the driver of functional hyperemia. Regional differences in the density of nNOS-expressing interneurons may contribute to variability in the extent to which NO assumes this permissive role. Consistent with a modulatory rather than exclusively primary function, recent human data demonstrate that selective nNOS inhibition alters the kinetics of the initial NVC response without significantly affecting peak amplitude. 59 These findings suggest that neuronal NO is particularly important for shaping the rapid onset of functional hyperemia, whereas sustained dilation likely depends on additional pathways.
In addition to diffusible NO, specialized neural-arteriolar smooth muscle cell junctions (NsMJs) 34 provide a rapid and spatially precise conduit for glutamatergic signaling to arteriolar smooth muscle. Glutamate released by activated neurons directly engages NMDA receptors located on the abluminal membrane of arteriolar smooth muscle cells (aSMCs), triggering vasodilation 34 (Figure 2). NsMJ-mediated transmission may account for up to ~60% of the CBF increase evoked by sensory stimulation under physiological conditions. 34 Mechanistically, NMDA receptor activation induces Ca2+ influx in aSMCs, which activates BKCa channels, increases K+ efflux, promotes membrane hyperpolarization and results in smooth muscle relaxation. 34 Although compelling, these findings require further replication across brain regions and stimulation paradigms to define their generalizability and quantitative contribution relative to NO-dependent signaling.
Endothelial electrical conduction
A major conceptual advance in NVC has been the recognition that capillary endothelial cells (cECs) function as electrically coupled networks capable of retrograde signal propagation.42,60–63 Chen et al. 60 first demonstrated that, similar to peripheral ECs, brain ECs can initiate retrogradely propagated vasodilation, that is, essential for the dilation of upstream segments of the cerebrovascular tree in response to neural activity. 60 Subsequent studies established that brain cECs act as sensors of local neuronal activity throughout the brain, supporting a mechanism in which the continuous, interconnected capillary network functions as a system of “wires” that transmit electrical signals to upstream parenchymal arterioles and ultimately to pial arteries. 42 Specifically, extracellular K+ released during neural activity activates inwardly rectifying potassium channels (KIR2.1) on cECs. 42 This produces rapid hyperpolarization that spreads from cell to cell via endothelial gap junctions and is transmitted to adjacent VSMCs at myoendothelial junctions, leading to smooth muscle hyperpolarization and arteriolar dilation. 42 Because KIR2.1 channels are themselves activated by hyperpolarization, this signal regenerates along the capillary network, enabling rapid retrograde conduction over substantial distance, ultimately reaching upstream arterioles and pial arteries 42 (Figures 2–4). Consistent with this hypothesis, endothelial deletion of KIR2.1 blocked the propagation of the vasodilation and suppressed the increase in CBF produced by whisker stimulation. 42 KIR2.1 channel function in cECs requires phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), a phospholipid localized in the endothelial plasma membrane critical for ion channel regulation. 64 Consistently, degradation of PIP2 impairs KIR2.1 function and activates capillary TRPV4 channels, thereby dampening retrograde electrical signaling. 65 A recent study has suggested an additional mechanism by which cECs may initiate retrograde hyperpolarization. 62

Mechanisms of neurovascular coupling in capillaries (first to fourth branch). ATP released during neuronal activity activates P2X receptors on astrocytes, leading to increased intracellular Ca2+ levels. The Ca2+ increase induces the release of AA, which is subsequently converted to PGE2 and EETs. Both mediators act on mural cells to promote relaxation. Specifically, PGE2 activates EP4 receptors, whereas EETs induce hyperpolarization of pericytes, resulting in pericyte relaxation. Increases in Ca2+ levels in astrocytes can also activate BKCa channels, leading to K+ efflux. The resulting rise in extracellular K+ activates KIR channels in VSMCs, causing VSMC hyperpolarization, and ultimately vasodilation. Increases in extracellular K+ following neuronal activation activate KIR2.1 channels in ECs, causing membrane hyperpolarization. Because KIR2.1 channels are themselves activated by hyperpolarization, this electrical signal is regenerated and rapidly propagates retrogradely from cell to cell through the capillary network via gap junctions, ultimately reaching upstream arterioles and pial arteries. PIP2 is required for KIR2.1 activity in ECs. Dashed lines represent pathways for which evidence is limited. ATP released by activated neurons is also converted to ADP by the ectonucleotidase CD39 in microglia and then to adenosine contributing to VSMCs relaxation and vasodilation.

Capillary-initiated electrical signals driving upstream arteriolar dilation. Neuronal activity increases extracellular K+, activating KIR2.1 channels in capillary ECs, and inducing membrane hyperpolarization that rapidly propagates retrogradely through gap junctions connecting adjacent ECs within the capillary network. This regenerative electrical signal spreads to precapillary and parenchymal arterioles, where it is transmitted to VSMCs and pericytes through cell-cell junctions, inducing their hyperpolarization of these cells and subsequent vasodilation. In parallel, TRPA1 channel-mediated Ca2+ influx in capillary ECs triggers ATP release through Panx1 channels, which activates purinergic P2X receptors on adjacent endothelial cells, generating Ca2+ signals that more slowly propagate retrogradely contributing to upstream arteriolar dilation. Although the molecular mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated, thin-strand pericytes can sense neuronal activity and convert it into KATP-dependent electrical signals that propagate retrogradely to upstream arterioles, also contributing to the initial cerebral blood flow increase associated with neuronal activity.
An additional endothelial initiation pathway involves transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) channel. 62 TRPA1 activation in cECs generates Ca2+ signals that propagate more slowly through the capillary network and induces dilation of upstream arterioles via endothelial pannexin-1 and purinergic signaling 62 (Figure 4). TRPA1-mediated signals propagate at approximately half the speed of KIR2.1-mediated conduction, indicating distinct mechanistic pathways. 62 Because reactive oxygen species (ROS) can activate TRPA1 channels, 66 it has been proposed that extracellular ROS generated by astrocytes or active neurons near brain capillaries may serve as physiological triggers. 62
Electrical conduction within arterioles depends on gap junction coupling among ECs, among VSMCs, and at myoendothelial junctions. 12 Arterial endothelial gap junctions critically determine both the speed and spatial extent of vasodilation propagation evoked by neural activity. 63 Gap junctions are formed by membrane proteins called connexins, which are highly expressed in arterial endothelial cells (aECs). 63 In Cx37/Cx40 double-knockout mice, stimulus-evoked vasodilation decays sharply with distance from the activation site, resulting in a blunted and spatially constrained dilation response. 63
Additional evidence implicates caveolin and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) in NVC regulation. Genetic deletion of either protein attenuates arteriolar dilation following whisker stimulation, suggesting that endothelial NO signaling contributes to full expression of the hyperemic response.61,67 Brain ECs also express neurotransmitter receptor subunits that can be directly targeted by neurotransmitters.35,36 Consistent with this, endothelial downregulation of the NMDA receptor subunit GluN1, mainly expressed on the basolateral endothelial membrane, suppresses NVC35,36 (Figure 2). Finally, brain ECs may not only contribute to the initiation of NVC but also participate in the return of blood flow to baseline through a mechanosensitive feedback system, in which activation of endothelial Piezo1 channels accelerates the recovery of CBF at the conclusion of neural stimulation. 68 Collectively, these findings position brain ECs as central initiators and propagators within the neurovascular unit.
Astrocytes: Amplification and sustained CBF response
While neuronal NO and specialized neural-arteriolar junctions provide rapid initiation of neurovascular coupling (NVC) and capillary endothelial cells propagate electrical signals retrogradely to upstream arterioles, astrocytes appear to contribute primarily to amplification and maintenance of the CBF response. The role of astrocytes in NVC was first demonstrated by Zonta et al., 33 who showed that neuronal activity activates astrocytic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), triggering intracellular Ca2+ release and inducing arteriole dilation both ex vivo and in vivo. Direct stimulation of astrocyte Ca2+ signals or mGluRs was sufficient to drive vasodilation, largely dependent on cyclooxygenase (COX) products, most likely astrocyte-derived prostaglandin E2. 33 Subsequent studies in brain slices69,70 and in vivo 71 confirmed that astrocyte Ca2+ uncaging evokes local hyperemia sensitive to COX-1 inhibition, and that neuronal stimulation drives both astrocytic Ca2+ elevations and arteriole dilation, effects suppressed by blocking mGluRs or COX-1. 71 Residual vasodilation found in the presence of COX inhibition suggested that additional pathways could be involved. 71 Indeed, elevations of intracellular Ca2+ in astrocytic endfeet open BKCa channels in astrocytic endfeet, leading to K+ efflux. 72 The resulting extracellular K+ increase activates inwardly rectifying K+ (KIR) channels in VSMCs or pericytes, causing hyperpolarization, closure of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, reduced intracellular Ca2+, and vasodilation 72 (Figure 3). Combined inhibition of BK channels and COX-1 fully abolished activity-evoked vasodilation, demonstrating that astrocytes contribute to NVC through both COX-dependent prostaglandin and a BK/K+-dependent electrical pathway. 72 However, the physiological relevance of the latter mechanism remains debated as NVC is normal in mice lacking a BK channel subunit, 73 and several studies question the role of astrocytic mGluRs in this process.74,75
Additional work indicates that astrocytic Ca2+ may not be strictly required for NVC. Selective chemogenetic activation of astrocytes, and sensory-evoked dilation persists in mice lacking inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 2 (IP3R2), a Ca2+-channel activated by inositol trisphosphate (IP3) mediating the release of Ca2+ from the endoplasmic reticulum.76–79 While IP3R2 loss abolishes nearly all somatic Ca2+ transients, it has a much smaller effect on astrocytic processes, where roughly 40% of Ca2+ transients remain. 80 Activation of olfactory sensory neuron terminals reliably elicits Ca2+ increases in astrocytic processes but not in the soma,81–83 indicating that localized Ca2+ increases in astrocytic endfeet, rather than somatic Ca2+ signals, are likely the critical for NVC.
The temporal profile of astrocytic responses further supports a role in amplification rather than in the initiation of the vasodilation induced by neural activity. Ca2+ increases in astrocytic cell bodies and processes occur seconds after neuronal activation and the onset of vasodilation.76,78,84 DREADD-mediated stimulation of astrocytic Gq-GPCR signaling elevates endfeet Ca2+ without altering nearby arterioles diameter, 78 and whisker stimulation triggers rapid arteriole dilation while endfeet Ca2+ rises more slowly. 84 Recent evidence reconciles these findings, showing that astrocytes amplify CBF responses when neuronal activity is sustained, even if they do not initiate or mediate the initial rapid dilation. 85
Astrocytic contributions also appear vessel-type specific. 37 At capillaries, vasodilation depends on astrocytic Ca2+ signaling mediated by P2X1 purinergic receptors, 37 initiating AA release via phospholipase D and COX-1-dependent prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production, which acts on pericyte EP4 receptors to drive dilation 37 (Figure 3). In contrast to capillary dilation, arteriole dilation does not depend on P2X1 receptors, PLA2, PLD2, or astrocyte Ca2+ signaling, but is mainly dependent on neuronal NMDA receptor activation and NO synthesis, as NOS inhibition or NMDA receptor antagonism suppressed the response of arterioles but not capillaries. 37
Astrocytes further contribute to NVC via production of other AA metabolites including epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs). EETs are synthesized from AA by specific cytochrome P450 enzymes epoxygenases, and mediate vasodilation by activating BKCa and blocking thromboxane receptors in VSMCs 58 (Figure 3). Taken together, these findings indicate that astrocytes play a crucial role in the amplification of the neurovascular response, complementing the rapid initiation by neurons and the retrograde electrical propagation mediated by cECs.
Pericytes: Dynamic and multifaceted regulators of capillary blood flow
The precise role of pericytes in regulating CBF has been a subject of intense debate, a controversy rooted less in irreconcilable data and more in inconsistent definitions of both “pericytes” and “capillaries,” as well as uncertainty about where the arteriolar tree ends and the capillary network begins. 13 Because mural cell phenotype changes gradually along the arteriole-capillary continuum, and no single molecular marker cleanly distinguishes pericytes from VSMCs, different studies have often classified the same vessel segments and the same cells in different ways. As a result, much of the apparent conflict in the literature likely reflects differences in anatomical nomenclature rather than true biological disagreement. 13 Building on this framework, this section reviews recent in vivo evidence showing that pericytes are not a uniform cell type. Instead, distinct subpopulations are specialized for different tasks, including rapid vasomotion, slow flow modulation, and sensory signal transduction within the neurovascular unit.
The proximal-to-distal transition in pericyte morphology, from the “ensheathing” cells of first-order capillaries (first to third/fourth-order), which feature short processes that nearly completely encase the vessel, to the “mesh” and ultimately the “thin-strand” phenotypes of deeper capillaries (fourth/fifth to ninth-order), characterized by longer, slender processes and increasingly sparse vessel coverage, is now understood to correlate with profound differences in physiological function6,13 (Figure 1). A central and enduring question arising from this heterogeneity is whether these morphologically distinct pericyte populations are indeed contractile and capable of dynamically modulating capillary diameter to regulate local blood flow.
If capillaries are defined as all vessels between the feeding arteriole and the draining venule, accumulating evidence supports the idea that at least some pericytes are contractile and can modulate capillary diameter both in vitro and in vivo.37,51,86–93 Pericytes have been shown to constrict in response to ATP or UTP, 88 thromboxane A2 analogs, 89 platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), 86 and angiotensin II. 87 Conversely, they contribute to the vasodilation evoked by neuronal activity, with astrocyte-derived PGE2 acting on pericyte EP4 receptors identified as a key mechanism for pericyte relaxation and capillary dilation37,90 (Figure 3). Consistent with a functional role in NVC, mice with ~30% pericyte loss due to haploinsufficiency of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β (PDGFR-β), exhibit impaired NVC and reduced brain oxygenation. 94
However, this view has been challenged by studies failing to detect a significant role for pericytes in regulating CBF.89,95,96 For instance, single-cell in vivo optogenetic activation of VSMCs constricts arterioles and reduces flow, while identical activation of pericytes produces no detectable changes in capillary diameter. 95 Similarly, sensory stimulation evokes rapid and robust dilation of VSMC-covered vessels but only slow and nearly undetectable dilation of pericyte-covered capillaries. 95 As noted earlier, many of these apparent contradictions likely stem from inconsistent definitions of where the arteriole ends and the capillary begins, leading different studies to classify the same transitional vessel segments, and their associated mural cells, in different ways. 13
To conclude that distal pericytes are entirely non-contractile, however, would be an oversimplification. Instead, a more nuanced picture is emerging, one in which pericyte contractility is not absent but kinetically distinct along the vascular tree. Hartmann et al., 93 employed two-photon laser ablation to selectively remove individual distal capillary pericytes (fifth to ninth order), without disrupting the blood–brain barrier, observing an increase in blood flow in the affected capillary segments. 93 Crucially, the same study found that the relaxation kinetics of these distal pericytes in response to neuronal stimulation are an order of magnitude slower than the rapid dilation of ensheathing pericytes (first to third/fourth-order). 93 This positions ensheathing pericytes as the early responders contributing to the initial, rapid phase of NVC, while the slow relaxation kinetics of distal capillary pericytes are more consistent with a role in the late phases of NVC. 93 The novelty here lies in shifting the paradigm from a binary “contractile versus non-contractile” debate to a more nuanced model of “fast versus slow” regulation. This conclusion was reinforced by the evidence that, depending on their location, pericytes respond differently to vasoconstrictive agents: proximal pericytes contract in response to the thromboxane A2 agonist U46619 or to a depolarizing concentration of K+ (60 mM). In contrast, distal pericytes also contract in response to U46619, but they do not respond to 60 mM K+, and their contraction occurs much more slowly than that of proximal pericytes. 92 Taken together, these findings further suggest that capillary pericytes can be broadly categorized into arteriole-proximal and distal populations, which regulate blood flow on fast and slow time scales, respectively, reflecting the corresponding kinetics of their contractile responses. 13
Further refining pericytes role in NVC, recent work has demonstrated that distal pericytes are not merely slow effectors but can also serve as sensory and signal-propagating nodes. They appear to sense neural activity and convert it into KATP -dependent electrical signals that propagate retrogradely to upstream arterioles, enabling precise spatiotemporal regulation of blood flow 97 (Figure 4). This is consistent with the findings of Gonzales et al., 92 who demonstrated that pericytes in the post-arteriole transitional region relax in vivo in response to KIR-dependent retrograde hyperpolarizing signals triggered by local K+ application to downstream capillaries, highlighting the direct electrical communication between capillary endothelial cells and pericytes via intercellular junctions. 92 Collectively, these findings suggest that thin-strand pericytes, like capillary ECs,42,62 may function primarily as sensors and signal transducers within the neurovascular unit, rather than as the principal effectors of rapid diameter changes.
Microglia and purinergic modulation
Although often overlooked as a component of the NVU, recent evidence has demonstrated that microglia may also actively regulate CBF.9–11 It has been estimated that about 30% of microglia observed in adult mice are associated with cerebral blood vessels 9 and establish direct contacts with VSMCs, pericytes, and astrocytes, cell types involved in CBF regulation. 10 Microglia can also interact directly with endothelial cells through gaps between adjacent astrocytic endfeet.10,98–100 Supporting their role in CBF regulation, depletion of microglia has been associated with a reduced CBF response to whisker stimulation and an increase in capillary diameter.9,10 Although the precise mechanisms remain unclear, evidence showing that functional hyperemia is suppressed following microglial P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12R) deletion suggests that microglial purinergic signaling may play a role in mediating their ability to regulate CBF.10,11 Recent work has provided additional mechanistic insight by showing that the ectonucleotidase CD39, which initiates the dephosphorylation of extracellular ATP into adenosine, also contributes to microglia-dependent CBF regulation 11 (Figures 2 and 3). Pharmacological inhibition or microglia-specific deletion of CD39 reproduces the CBF alterations observed in microglia-deficient mice. 11 Overall, these findings indicate that microglia may use P2Y12R to sense extracellular ATP and orient their processes to initiate CD39-mediated breakdown of ATP into adenosine, which emerges as a crucial mediator of microglia-dependent regulation of cerebrovascular reactivity.
Cerebrovascular autoregulation
Cerebral autoregulation is the intrinsic capacity of the cerebral vasculature to maintain stable CBF despite fluctuations in blood pressure (BP; reviewed by Claassen et al. 101 ). Niels Lassen first described the relationship between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CBF, proposing that cerebral autoregulation includes a plateau region, in which CBF remains essentially constant over a relatively wide MAP range of ~60–150 mmHg. 102 This physiological relationship, now referred to as static cerebral autoregulation (CA), has been replicated across animal studies, non-human primates, and humans, confirming the substantial autoregulatory capacity of the cerebral circulation. 101 However, recent evidence in humans suggests that the autoregulatory plateau is narrower than previously assumed, with estimates placing it at MAP 80–100 mmHg, indicating a more limited range of CA. 103 In addition, the cerebral vasculature appears to respond more effectively to increases in MAP than to decreases. 103 While static CA describes the steady-state relationship between MAP and CBF, it does not account for rapid changes in BP. 101 The cerebral circulation also exhibits dynamic autoregulation, referring to its ability to respond to transient BP fluctuations occurring over seconds to minutes, such as during postural changes, coughing, or physical activity. 101 During these rapid perturbations, CBF can show substantially greater variability than predicted by the static model, and the effectiveness of autoregulation depends on both the magnitude and the rate of BP change. 101 Higher-frequency MAP fluctuations are more linearly transmitted to the cerebral circulation, whereas slower fluctuations have a smaller impact on CBF, such that flow becomes nearly unaffected. 101
CA relies, in part, on the intrinsic ability of VSMCs to contract in response to increases in intravascular pressure and to dilate in response to decreased pressure, a mechanism known as the Bayliss myogenic response. 104 Myogenic response is a critical component of resistance artery function and is more pronounced in the cerebral circulation than in any other vascular bed. Fog, who first described it in pial arteries and arterioles, 105 speculated that reductions in vessel diameter during increases in BP would prevent a rise in capillary pressure and thereby protect against brain edema. The underlying mechanism involves pressure-induced depolarization of VSMCs and an increase in intracellular Ca2+, which promotes contraction and reduces vascular diameter. Conversely, decreases in intravascular pressure lead to hyperpolarization, reduced intracellular Ca2+, relaxation of VSMCs, and vasodilation. How mechanical stress from intravascular pressure changes is transduced into alterations in membrane potential remains an open question. 101 Assuming the myogenic response is the primary mechanism underlying cerebral autoregulation, cerebral arteries and arterioles, both pial and parenchymal, play a major role in mediating CBF responses to BP fluctuations. In contrast, capillaries, despite their large surface area, are unlikely to contribute significantly to autoregulation due to the absence of VSMCs. 101
Endothelial regulation of vascular tone
While myogenic mechanisms intrinsic to VSMCs provide the foundation for autoregulation, the endothelium lining the entire vascular tree exerts critical modulatory control over vascular tone. Brain ECs release vasoactive factors in response to chemical signals or mechanical forces, fine-tuning cerebrovascular resistance to meet local demands. 5 These mediators include vasodilators such as NO, endothelium-derived hyperpolarization factor (EDHF), and prostanoids, as well as vasoconstrictors, including endothelin-1 (ET-1). The importance of the cerebral endothelium is underscored by evidence that endothelial dysfunction is a key mechanism in the pathophysiology of cerebrovascular diseases including cerebral small vessel disease. 106
Under basal conditions, tonic release of endothelial NO is arguably the most significant regulator of resting CBF (reviewed by Toda et al. 107 ). Consistent with this role, NOS inhibition constricts cerebral arteries both in vitro and in vivo and decreases CBF. 107 In the endothelium, NO is produced by eNOS, a calcium-calmodulin-dependent enzyme whose activity is tightly regulated by intracellular Ca2+ levels. 107 Importantly, eNOS activity is modulated not only by intracellular Ca2+ but also by shear stress, phosphorylation status, and interactions with caveolin-1, providing multiple layers of regulation responsive to both pressure and flow changes. 108 NO generated by eNOS diffuses to adjacent VSMCs, where it activates soluble guanylate cyclase, leading to increased cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels and subsequent smooth muscle relaxation via K+ channel activation and/or reduced Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile machinery. This signaling cascade is generally regarded as the primary mechanism underlying NO-mediated dilation of cerebral arteries and arterioles. 5
EDHF also contributes to CBF regulation through a parallel pathway that becomes increasingly important as cerebral vessel diameter decreases. 109 EDHF responses are initiated by increases in endothelial intracellular Ca2+, leading to endothelial hyperpolarization via activation of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (IKCa) channels. 5 This hyperpolarization is then transmitted to VSMCs, resulting in vasodilation. Although the precise signaling mechanism remains incompletely defined, growing evidence suggests that EDHF-mediated dilation in cerebral arteries involves myoendothelial gap junction communication rather than diffusible mediators. 5
Cerebrovascular tone is also influenced by eicosanoids, bioactive metabolites derived from AA. 5 Among these, prostacyclin (PGI2) is the most extensively studied eicosanoid in brain ECs and induces vasodilation by increasing cyclic AMP and protein kinase A in VSMCs. 5 Nevertheless, its role in regulating vascular tone appears to be less prominent than that of NO and EDHF under physiological conditions.
In contrast to these vasodilatory pathways, ET-1 is a potent endothelial-derived vasoconstrictor that reduces local CBF through activation of endothelin type A receptors on VSMCs, while activation of endothelial endothelin type B receptors promotes vasodilation. 110 Because of its long-lasting vasoconstrictive effects, ET-1 appears to play little role in the regulation of CBF under normal conditions. However, it becomes important in pathological states and has been implicated in the cerebrovascular dysfunction associated with hypertension 111 and neurodegenerative diseases. 112
Neurovascular dysregulation in hypertension
Hypertension (HTN) profoundly affects neurovascular function in both animal models and humans (reviewed by Santisteban et al. 113 ). Beyond inducing structural vascular remodeling, HTN impairs the dynamic regulation of CBF through multiple molecular pathways that converge on oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. Here, we synthesize evidence from animal models to examine the mechanisms by which hypertension alters cerebrovascular regulation.
Angiotensin II, perivascular macrophages, and oxidative stress
A substantial body of evidence implicates angiotensin II (Ang II) signaling as a central driver of neurovascular dysfunction in hypertension. Acute or chronic administration of angiotensin-II (Ang II) attenuates NVC, 114 an effect, that is, rescued by reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, indicating a key role for vascular oxidative stress. 115 Several lines of evidence suggest that this impairment is independent of systemic BP elevation. First, in the slow-pressor Ang II model of HTN, NVC, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation deficits precede the onset of elevated BP and persist even after normalization of BP. 116 Second, topical neocortical application of Ang II reproduces these deficits without altering systemic BP. 114 Third, CBF responses remain intact when BP is increased by phenylephrine, a vasoconstrictor that does not activate Ang II signaling. 114 Consistent with these observations, genetic models of HTN, characterized by elevated circulating Ang II, including BPH mice 117 and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), 118 also exhibit impairment of CBF responses. Mechanistically, Ang II does not appear to act directly on neurons, as it leaves whisker-evoked field potentials unchanged after either acute 114 or chronic 116 administration. Instead, Ang II activates AT1R in perivascular macrophages (PVMs), innate immune cells closely associated with cerebral arterioles and venules 117 (Figure 5). Activation of AT1R signaling in PVMs leads to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production via nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 2 (NOX2), most likely resulting in NO scavenging and consequent impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and NVC 117 (Figure 5). Consistent with this, depletion of PVMs by intracerebroventricular clodronate or AT1R deletion in bone-marrow derived cells prevents the neurovascular dysfunction. 117 Additional evidence from stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) further supports this concept. 119 The relative contribution of other cell types remains incompletely defined. Although brain ECs also express AT1R and NOX2, 120 single-cell RNA sequencing indicates that NOX2 expression in ECs is relatively low compared with microglia and PVMs, 120 suggesting that ECs are unlikely to be the primary source of Ang II-induced oxidative stress. Nevertheless, recent evidence points to additional, AT1R-independent mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in HTN, including impaired function of endothelial KIR2.1 channels, 121 indicating that multiple parallel pathways may contribute.

Mechanisms of cerebrovascular dysfunction in hypertension. In ANGII slow-pressor hypertension, increased BBB permeability permits circulating ANGII to enter the perivascular space and activate AT1R on BAMs. This, in turn, stimulates NOX2-dependent ROS production, resulting in cerebrovascular dysfunction via scavenging of endothelial- and neuronal-derived NO and consequent formation of ONOO−. In the DOCA-salt model, cerebrovascular dysfunction depends on two distinct IL-17-dependent mechanisms involving brain ECs and BAMs: (1) in the circulation, IL-17 produced by intestinal T cells acts on endothelial IL-17RA, reducing endothelial NO production and suppressing endothelium-dependent vasodilation and (2) in the brain, IL-17 produced by dura-associated γδ-T cells acts on IL-17RA expressed by BAMs, inducing vascular oxidative stress and impairing functional hyperemia, with minimal effects on endothelial vasodilatory function. Dashed line indicates blunted eNOS-derived NO production due to IL-17A-mediated inhibition.
IL-17: A unifying link between hypertension, high salt, and neurovascular dysfunction
A distinct pathway involving interleukin-17 (IL-17) has emerged from studies of both dietary salt loading and the deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt model of hypertension, revealing a common immune-mediated mechanism that operates independently of classical Ang II signaling.
Excessive dietary salt intake has emerged as an independent risk factor for cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment, distinct from its effects on BP (reviewed by Faraco 122 ). In mice, high salt diet (HSD) reduces resting cerebral perfusion and selectively impairs endothelial NO-dependent vasodilation while leaving NVC intact. 123 These effects are mediated by a gut-derived Th17 immune response that increases circulating IL-17A, which in turn suppresses eNOS activity via inhibitory phosphorylation at Thr495 through Rho-kinase activation in brain ECs. 123 Genetic deletion or pharmacological neutralization of IL-17A prevents the cerebrovascular effects of HSD, while systemic IL-17A administration recapitulates them. 123
Building on this foundation, subsequent work in the DOCA-salt model of HTN revealed that IL-17 also contributes to neurovascular dysfunction, but with distinct mechanistic features. 124 In this model, neurovascular dysfunction is not mediated by central Ang II signaling but rather by IL-17 acting on both sides of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). 124 Importantly, IL-17 acts on distinct cellular targets on either side of the BBB. Circulating IL-1, likely released by intestinal T cells, acts on endothelial IL-17 receptor A (IL-17RA) to reduce NO production via inhibitory phosphorylation of eNOS at Thr495,123,124 impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation without affecting NVC 124 (Figure 5). In contrast, IL-17 derived from dura-associated T cells acts on IL-17RA expressed by border-associated macrophages (BAMs), inducing vascular oxidative stress and suppressing NVC, with minimal effects on endothelial function 124 (Figure 5). These findings reveal that the same cytokine can produce distinct functional deficits depending on which side of the BBB it engages, highlighting the complexity of neurovascular regulation in disease.
A critical question is whether these IL-17-mediated cerebrovascular deficits have functional consequences for the brain. Both the HSD and DOCA-salt models are associated with cognitive impairment,123,124 and a mechanistic link between endothelial dysfunction and cognitive decline has been proposed. 125 Faraco et al. 125 demonstrated that HSD promotes tau phosphorylation and aggregation through a pathway originating from reduced eNOS-derived NO. 125 Specifically, endothelial NO deficiency suppresses calpain nitrosylation, leading to calpain activation, cleavage of p35–p25, overactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), and subsequent pathological tau phosphorylation. 125 The functional relevance of this pathway is supported by evidence that tau-null mice are protected from HSD-induced cognitive deficits, as are animals treated with anti-tau antibodies. 125 While this mechanism remains to be validated in the DOCA-salt model, it illustrates how disruption of CBF regulation, specifically endothelial NO deficiency driven by IL-17, can directly impact neuronal function and contribute to cognitive impairment. Whether these mechanisms translate to humans remains largely unknown. However, circulating levels of IL-17A have been shown to correlate with cognitive impairment,126–128 suggesting that these pathways may be clinically relevant.
Central pathways and downstream effectors
Beyond local vascular mechanisms, central pathways may also contribute to hypertension-induced dysfunction. In the slow-pressor Ang II model, cerebrovascular impairment requires ROS production in the subfornical organ (SFO) and involves not only AT1R activation but also vasopressin release, upregulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in cerebral arterioles, and activation of ET-1 type A (ETA) receptors. 111 Both ET-1 and Ang II appear to converge on vascular oxidative stress as a common downstream mechanism. 111 Because ETA receptors are highly expressed in pericytes, 120 it is plausible that pericyte-mediated vascular dysfunction may contribute to the observed impairment of NVC, although direct evidence is lacking. More broadly, recent transcriptomic analyses have revealed major molecular changes across multiple NVU cell types in HTN, providing the foundation for further mechanistic studies aimed at defining how coordinated gene expression alterations drive neurovascular dysfunction. 129
Neurovascular dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease
Increasing evidence demonstrates that vascular dysfunction is associated with AD and may play a critical role in its pathogenesis.130,131 Multiple vascular alterations have been reported in AD, including blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption, impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, enhanced vascular inflammation, capillary stalling, and vascular remodeling.130,131 In this section, we focus specifically on evidence from basic and preclinical research demonstrating alterations in neurovascular regulatory mechanisms that compromise the ability of cerebral blood vessels to properly control CBF.132,133 A central question emerging from this literature is whether distinct AD-related pathogenic factors, amyloid-β (Aβ), tau, and ApoE4 genotype, converge on common or divergent pathways to disrupt neurovascular regulation.
Amyloid-β (Aβ)
The vasoactive properties of Aβ were first demonstrated by Thomas et al., 134 who showed that Aβ constricts isolated aortas and impairs endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine, an effect attributed to increased vascular oxidative stress. 134 Subsequent work has confirmed that endothelial dysfunction is present in cerebral blood vessels of APP transgenic mice, 135 while response to NO donors remained intact, indicating that the impairment is not due to a nonspecific loss of vascular smooth muscle responsiveness. 135 Later studies in Tg2576 mice revealed that Aβ disrupts multiple regulatory processes governing CBF, including NVC, endothelial function, and CA.136–139 Importantly, superfusion of the somatosensory cortex of wild-type mice with Aβ1–40, but not Aβ1–42, recapitulates the impairments observed in APP transgenic mice, suggesting that different Aβ peptides exert distinct vasoactive effects.140,141 Cerebrovascular dysfunction has been reported across multiple APP transgenic models and brain regions,142–151 with vascular abnormalities typically emerging before amyloid plaque deposition, tau pathology, and cognitive decline, implicating neurovascular dysfunction as an early pathogenic event in AD. 152
A unifying theme across these studies is the central role of oxidative stress. Endothelial dysfunction in APP-overexpressing mice can be rescued by exogenous superoxide dismutase (SOD) or prevented by SOD1 overexpression, 136 and the free radical scavenger MnTBAP counteracts the effects of Aβ1–40 on resting CBF. 141 Mechanistic studies have identified CD36 as a critical molecular link between Aβ1–40 and vascular oxidative stress. The cerebrovascular effects of Aβ are absent in Tg2576 mice lacking CD36 and in CD36 knockout mice exposed to exogenous Aβ1–40. 153 Subsequent work has demonstrated that Aβ activates CD36 specifically on BAMs, triggering NOX2-dependent superoxide production, which scavenges NO and impairs both NVC and endothelium-dependent vasodilation 154 (Figure 6). Consistent with this, depletion of BAMs or transplantation of CD36−/− bone-marrow cell rescues neurovascular function. 154 Because PVMs are predominantly located along penetrating arteries and precapillary arterioles, these findings suggest that Aβ primarily disrupts neurovascular regulatory mechanisms at this level of the cerebrovascular tree.

Examples of mechanisms underlying cerebrovascular dysfunction in AD at multiple levels of the cerebral microvasculature. At the arteriolar level, activation of CD36 on PVMs triggers NOX2-dependent production of ROS, leading to vascular oxidative stress. This, in turn, scavenges NO, resulting in impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation and NVC. At the capillary level, activation of NOX4 in pericytes induces oxidative stress, which increases ET-1 expression in brain ECs. ET-1 then acts on ETAR on pericytes, causing their contraction and reducing capillary diameter and CBF. The resulting reduction in CBF compromises the delivery of oxygen and glucose, which can activate BACE1, thereby increasing Aβ production. This establishes a vicious cycle in which vascular dysfunction promotes amyloidogenesis, further exacerbating cerebrovascular and neuronal dysfunction. In parallel, tau pathology impairs NVC by disrupting the functional coupling between NMDAR, PSD95, and nNOS, thereby reducing nNOS-derived NO production and further limiting NO bioavailability, which contributes to impaired NVC.
However, more recent evidence indicates that capillaries are also highly vulnerable to the cerebrovascular effects of Aβ. In both humans with developing AD and in AppNL-G-F mice, capillaries are selectively constricted, whereas arteriolar and venular diameters remain unchanged. 112 Mechanistically, Aβ directly constricts capillaries through a pathway involving NOX4-dependent ROS production, which triggers endothelin-1 (ET-1) release and subsequent activation of endothelin type A (ETA) receptors on pericytes, inducing contraction and capillary narrowing. 112 This capillary-specific pathway appears distinct from the PVM-dependent mechanism at the arteriolar level, suggesting that Aβ disrupts different segments of the vascular tree through cell-type-specific mechanisms. Importantly, Aβ-evoked capillary constriction can be prevented by NOX4 or ETA receptor inhibition and reversed by the vasodilator C-type natriuretic peptide 112 or the voltage-gated calcium channel blocker nimodipine. 155 The resulting reduction in CBF and energy supply may, in turn, increase Aβ production by upregulating β-amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), establishing a vicious cycle 112 (Figure 6). A broader role for ET-1 in AD-related cerebrovascular dysfunction is further supported by evidence that loss of CD2-associated protein (CD2AP), an endothelial protein whose levels are reduced in AD brains, 156 impairs NVC, resting CBF, and vasomotion, effects partially rescued by antagonism of ET-1 signaling. 156
The importance of oxidative stress in mediating the vascular effects of Aβ is further underscored by another study showing that Aβ-induced oxidative stress promotes DNA damage, activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), and ADP-ribose-dependent opening of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) channels, leading to elevated intracellular Ca2+ levels and endothelial dysfunction. 157 Together with the previous evidence, these findings support a model in which oxidative stress is initially triggered in PVMs via CD36–NOX2 signaling and subsequently propagates to brain ECs, where it promotes a cascade of events that amplifies vascular dysfunction.
Beyond oxidative stress, Aβ can compromise endothelial function through other pathways. Specifically, studies in 5xFAD and APP23 mouse models have shown impairments in both functional hyperemia and K+-induced retrograde vasodilation,146,158 effects driven by a suppression of KIR2.1 channel activity in cECs.146,158 Notably, systemic administration of PIP2, a critical regulator of KIR2.1 channels, successfully restores channel function and rescues the cerebrovascular alterations. 146 A separate pathway involving reduced tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity, resulting from increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity, has been implicated in NVC impairment in AD. 159 Because tPA modulates NMDAR activity and couples neuronal activation to nNOS-derived NO production, reduced tPA activity may uncouple this signaling cascade, selectively impairing NVC without affecting endothelial function. 159 This interpretation is supported by evidence that Aβ does not impair NVC in tPA- or PAI-1-null mice. 159 Additionally, mTOR-mediated inhibition of nNOS phosphorylation has been proposed as another mechanism reducing nNOS-derived NO and attenuating NVC in AD. 147 Interestingly, although most studies do not report alterations in VSMC function,136,144,149,153,154,157,159,160 a recent study found that BKCa channel activity, which normally opposes vasoconstriction via hyperpolarizing currents in VSMCs, is reduced in 5xFAD mice via sex-dependent mechanisms, 161 suggesting that this reduction may contribute to a hypercontractile state in the cerebral microcirculation in AD. Together, these observations indicate that Aβ disrupts cerebrovascular regulation through multiple parallel pathways that target different cell types and vessel segments. An important open question is the relative contribution of each pathway at different stages and whether they represent independent or interacting processes.
Tau
Tau pathology has also been implicated in neurovascular uncoupling, 162 though through mechanisms distinct from those engaged by Aβ. In PS19 mice overexpressing human tau, NMDAR-dependent NO release and NVC are markedly reduced, and these deficits precede overt neurodegeneration or tangle formation. 162 In the rTg4510 mice, doxycycline-induced suppression of tau production rescues NVC, 162 whereas neurofibrillary tangles formation is unaffected, pointing to soluble tau species, rather than insoluble tangles, as the mediators of vascular dysfunction. 162 Mechanistically, tau disrupts the interaction between nNOS and its scaffolding protein PSD95, uncoupling NMDAR activation from neuronal NO production 162 (Figure 6). Whether this mechanism interacts with the mTOR-mediated suppression of nNOS expression also reported in AD 147 remains to be determined.
The effects of tau on endothelial function are more complex and somewhat inconsistent across studies. Park et al. 162 found that endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine, bradykinin, or the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 was intact in both PS19 or rTg4510 mice, 162 and topical application of exogenous tau to wild-type cortex did not impair endothelial responses. 162 However, resting CBF, which is largely dependent on endothelial NO, was reduced in PS19 mice. 162 More recent studies using genetically encoded Ca2+ biosensors have shown that soluble pathogenic tau peptides disrupt endothelial Ca2+ signaling required for NO production and vasodilation, 163 and accumulation of tau in brain ECs disrupts eNOS trafficking, leading to eNOS inhibition and impaired NO-mediated vasodilation. 164 These discrepancies may reflect differences between acute and chronic tau exposure, distinct tau species, or the specific vascular beds examined. Resolving these inconsistencies will require systematic studies directly comparing endothelial function across models and conditions.
ApoE4 genotype
The ApoE4 genotype, the strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic AD, 165 increases susceptibility to microvascular pathology, including white matter damage and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) observed during anti-Aβ immunotherapy. Humanized ApoE4 knock-in mice (ApoE4-TR) exhibit marked impairment in NVC,166,167 dependent on ROS production via NADPH oxidase.166,167 As in models of hypertension and Aβ accumulation,117,154 BAMs are the principal pathogenic source of ROS. 167 Depletion of BAMs or selective deletion of ApoE4 in BAMs using Mrc1Cre+/ApoE4fl/fl mice fully rescues neurovascular function without altering total brain or circulating ApoE levels, identifying BAM-derived ApoE4 as the key driver of cerebrovascular dysfunction. 167 This striking convergence with the Aβ literature, both involving perivascular macrophages and oxidative stress, suggests that BAMs may represent a common cellular target of diverse AD-related risk factors and a critical therapeutic target. However, whether interventions targeting BAMs would be effective once dysfunction is established, and whether they would translate to humans, remains to be determined. Additional evidence indicates that ApoE4 expression in vascular mural cells also contributes to dysfunction. Expression of ApoE4, but not ApoE3, in vascular mural cells impairs arteriolar blood flow, 168 pointing to pericytes and VSMCs as other critical cellular mediators of ApoE4 vascular toxicity. Whether this reflects direct effects on mural cell function or interactions with adjacent endothelial cells remains to be determined.
Conclusion
Proper neurovascular regulation is essential for maintaining cerebral perfusion, metabolic support, and overall brain health. Dysregulation of these mechanisms, whether due to endothelial dysfunction, impaired NVC, or altered CA, can compromise energy delivery and ultimately contribute to cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases. Evidence from both animal models and humans indicates that these mechanisms are altered early during HTN and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although progress has been made in elucidating the pathways leading to cerebrovascular dysfunction, the temporal relationship between the various mechanisms identified in preclinical models, whether they operate in parallel or sequentially, remains poorly defined. Additionally, how neurovascular dysfunction translates into cognitive impairment remains poorly understood in most cases. The mechanisms by which cerebrovascular dysfunction directly drives cognitive deficits, beyond the well-established link between hypoperfusion and energy failure, are only beginning to be elucidated. The discovery that endothelial NO deficiency can promote tau phosphorylation through calpain-CDK5 signaling provides a compelling example of how vascular dysfunction may actively contribute to neurodegeneration, independently of reductions in CBF. Advancing this knowledge will require continued integration of mechanistic studies in animal models with translational investigations in humans. The development of therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving cerebrovascular integrity, whether by targeting oxidative stress, modulating immune responses, or restoring NO bioavailability, holds promise for protecting cognitive function in aging and disease. A deeper understanding of how neurovascular regulatory mechanisms fail in disease will be critical for realizing this potential.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Figures were created with the BioRender scientific illustration software.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the following grants: RO1NS130045-01 (NINDS) and CAF211776-01 (Cure Alzheimer’s Fund).
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
