This paper explains how local government disaster plans can foster disaster resiliency of socially vulnerable population groups in ways that are not fully addressed by the predominant disaster planning literature. The benefits of disaster planning aimed at building the capacity of socially vulnerable populations are discussed. We present two critical choices that must be considered in creating high quality disaster plans: choices among plan design options; and choices to support plan quality principles that provide guidance to account for socially vulnerable populations. Application of the design options and principles is illustrated based on a content analysis of three local disaster plans. The conceptual and practical implications of the options and principles are reviewed.
American Planning Association.2006. APA's Response to the Devastation from Hurricane Katrina, (http://www.planning.org/katrina/. accessed December 12, 2006).
2.
BaerWilliam. 1997. “General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association63(3): 329–344.
3.
BerkePhilip, KartezJack, and WengerDennis. 1993. “Recovery after Disaster: Achieving Sustainable Development, Mitigation, and Equity.” Disasters17(2): 93–109.
4.
BerkePhilip, and FrenchSteven. 1994. “The Influences of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality.” Journal of Planning Education and Research13(4): 237–250.
5.
BerkePhilip, EricksenNeil, CrawfordJan, and DixonJenny. 2002. “Planning and Indigenous People: Human Rights and Environmental Protection in New Zealand.” Journal of Planning Education and Research22(2): 115–134.
6.
BerkePhilip, GodschalkDavid, KaiserEdward, with RodriguezDaniel. 2006. Urban Land Use Planning, 5th Ed.Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
7.
BerkePhilip, and GodschalkDavid. 2009. “Searching for the Good Plan: A Meta-analysis of Plan Quality Studies.” Journal of Planning Literature23(3): 227–240.
8.
BerkePhilip, and SmithGavin. 2009. “Hazard Mitigation, Planning, and Disaster Resiliency: Challenges and Strategic Choices for the 21st Century.” Pp. 1–23 in Sustainable Development and Disaster Resiliency, edited by FraUrbanoAmsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.
9.
BirklandThomas A.1997. After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events.Washington: Georgetown University Press.
10.
BlaikiePiers, CannonTerry, DavisIan, and WisnerBen. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters.London: Routledge.
11.
BolinRobert, and BoltonPatricia. 1986. Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery. Monograph #42. Boulder CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Science.
12.
BrodySamuel, HighfieldWesley E., ThorntonSara. 2006. “Planning at the Urban Fringe: An Examination of the Factors Influencing Nonconforming Development Patterns in Southern Florida.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3: 75–96.
13.
BurbyRaymond, and MayPeter, with BerkePhilip, DaltonLinda, FrenchSteven, and KaiserEdward. 1997. Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
ConnerlyCharles. 1990. “State Mandated Housing Plans: How Effective Are They? A Case Study of Florida's Growth Management Act Housing Element Requirement.” Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association Schools of Collegiate Planning, Austin, Texas, 1–4 November.
15.
CopperJohn. 2004. The Disadvantaged in Community Rating System Hazard Mitigation Planning.Chapel Hill, NC: Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina.
16.
CutterSusan, MitchellJerry, and ScottMichael. 2000. “Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown, South Carolina.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers90(4): 713–737.
17.
CutterSusan, and EmrichChristopher. 2006. “Moral Hazard, Social Catastrophe: The Changing Face of Vulnerability along the Hurricane Coasts.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604(March): 102–112.
18.
DaltonLinda, and BurbyRaymond. 1994. “Mandates, Plans, and Planners.” Journal of the American Planning Association60(4): 151–168.
19.
DeyleRobert, and SmithC.. 1998. “Local Government Compliance with State Planning Mandates: The Effects of State Implementation in Florida.” Journal of the American Planning Association64(4): 457–461.
20.
DeyleRobert, ChapinTim, and BakerEarl J.. 2008. “The Proof of Planning is in the Platting: An Evaluation of Florida's Mitigation Planning Mandate.” Journal of the American Planning Association74(3): 349–369.
21.
GodschalkDavid. 2007. “Mitigation.” Pp. 111–140 in Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government, edited by WaughWilliam, and TierneyKathleenWashington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
22.
GruftAndrew, and GutsteinDonald. 1972. “An Analysis of Comprehensive Planning Reports.” Pp. 26-2-1–26-2-10 in Environmental Design: Research and Practice, edited by MitchellWilliam. Los Angeles: Proceedings of the EDRA 3/ar 8 Conference, University of California.
23.
HaddowGeorge, and BullockJane. 2006. Introduction to Emergency Management, 2nd Edition.New York: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
24.
LindellMichael, and PerryRonald. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
LindellMichael, PraterCarla, and PerryRonald. 2006. Fundamentals of Emergency Management.Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Available at www.training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/fem.asp or archone.tamu.edu/hrrc/Publications/books/index.html.
26.
LindellMichael, and PerryRonald. 2007. “Planning and Preparedness.” Pp. 58–88 in Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government, edited by WaughWilliam, and TierneyKathleenWashington, D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
27.
MilesMathew B., and HubermanMichael. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
28.
MunizBrenda. 2006. In the Eye of the Storm: How the Government and Private Response to Hurricane Katrina Failed Latinos.Washington, D.C.: National Council of La Raza.
29.
NortonRichard. 2008. “Using Content Analysis to Evaluate Local Master Plans and Zoning Codes.” Land Use Policy25: 432–454.
30.
OlshankyRobert, and JohnsonLaurie. 2010. Clear as Mud. Chicago: Planning for the Rebuilding New Orleans.Chicago: American Planning Association.
31.
PeacockWalter, MorrowBetty, and GladwinHugh. 1997. Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters.London: Routledge.
32.
Pitt County Emergency Management. 2001. Pitt County Disaster Plan for Populations with Special Medical Needs.Greenville, NC: Author.
33.
Roseville Planning Department. 2005. City of Roseville Hazard Mitigation Plan.Roseville, CA: Author.
SchwabJim, ToppingKenneth, EadieCharles, DeyleRobert, and SmithRichard A.. 1998. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 483/484. Chicago: American Planning Association Press.
37.
SmithGavin, and WengerDennis. 2006. “Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Operationalizing an Existing Framework.” Pp. 234–257 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodríguezHavidán, QuarantelliEnrico L., and DynesRussell R.. New York: Springer.
38.
TangZhenghong, LindellMichael K., PraterCarla S., and BrodySamuel D.. 2008. “Measuring Tsunami Planning Capacity on the U.S. Pacific Coast.” Natural Hazards Review9(2): 91–100.
39.
Washington Emergency Public Education. 2006. Map Your Neighborhood.Olympia, WA: Author.
40.
WengerDennis, JamesTom, and FaupelCharles. 1980. “Disaster Planning: An Examination of Disaster Plans and Public Expectations.” Pp. 78–125 in Disaster Beliefs and Emergency Planning, edited by FaupelCharlesNew York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
41.
WuJie Ying, and LindellMichael K.. 2004. “Housing Reconstruction After Two Major Earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge Earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan.” Disasters28: 63–81.
42.
ZhangYang, and PeacockWalter. 2010. “Planning for Housing Recovery: Lessons Learned from Hurricane Andrew.” Journal of the American Planning Association76(1): 5–24.
