Azacitidine-induced acute lung injury in a patient with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome

Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic disease characterized by cytopenia arising from ineffective hematopoiesis and an increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML). ¹ The current treatment options for patients with MDS are limited, with the main treatment comprising supportive care with blood transfusions and/or hematopoietic growth factors.

Azacitidine is a first-in-class demethylating agent which has been demonstrated to significantly prolong survival while causing mild adverse events in patients with higher-risk MDS.^2,3 Azacitidine was approved for use by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in 2011 and is widely used in Japan as a first-line treatment for patients with higher-risk MDS.

Several large-scale clinical trials of azacitidine have been conducted, and the majority of severe adverse events detected in these trials were hematological.^4–6 However, some cases involving non-infectious pulmonary toxicities related to azacitidine treatment have been reported in Japan and in Western countries, although previous trials have not described these types of adverse events.^7–14 Pulmonary toxicities are rare but potentially critical adverse events, and their clinical characteristics and most appropriate management strategies remain unknown.

Here, we report the case of a patient with therapy-related MDS secondary to follicular lymphoma (FL) who suffered from a rare adverse event, an acute lung injury (ALI), which was suspected to have been caused by azacitidine treatment.

Case report

A 77-year-old male visited our hospital to undergo follow-up examinations after treatment for FL. He had been suffering from advanced-stage FL, which was initially diagnosed 14 years previously. He had been treated with six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone), ibritumomab tiuxetan, and two cycles of bendamustine, and achieved a durable complete remission for 4 years.

A laboratory test performed at the time of his visit showed pancytopenia. The patient’s peripheral white blood cell count was 1,200/µL (neutrophils, 46%; blastic cells, 2%), hemoglobin level was 7.9 g/dL, and platelet count was 9.8 × 104/µL. Bone marrow aspiration revealed a hypocellular bone marrow and dysplastic changes in three lineages. Blastic cells accounted for 8.8% of all nucleated cells. Complex karyotypic abnormalities, including del (7), were observed during G-banding. Based on these results, therapy-related MDS was diagnosed (refractory anemia with an excess of blasts type 2 (RAEB-2) with high-risk features of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)). ¹⁵

The patient was treated with azacitidine (75 mg/m²/day for 5 days) via subcutaneous injection. During the first cycle, he suffered from septic arthritis of the left hip and required hospitalization, whereby intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin were administered for 14 days. After the patient recovered from his septic arthritis, he commenced the second cycle of azacitidine combined with oral levofloxacin as a prophylaxis against infection.

On day 4 of cycle 2, he had a fever of up to 38.4℃ and exhibited oxygen desaturation. His peripheral white blood cell count was 1,300/µL (neutrophils, 17%; blastic cells, 13%). His CD4-positive T-cell count was low (119/µL). His other laboratory findings are shown in Table 1. Treatment for febrile neutropenia (intravenous cefepime and micafungin) was initiated, but his symptoms did not improve. The patient’s clinical course is summarized in Figure 1.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 1.

Laboratory findings at the time of onset.

Count of blood cells			Biochemistry
WBC	1,300	µ/L	TP	5.2	g/dL
Segmented neutrophils	10	%	Alb	2.3	g/dL
Stab neutrophils	3	%	T-Bil	0.6	mg/dL
Lymphocytes	49	%	BUN	24	mg/dL
Monocytes	20	%	Cr	0.90	mg/dL
Eosinophils	0	%	Na	133	mEq/L
Basophils	1	%	K	3.4	mEq/L
Blasts	13	%	Cl	100	mEq/L
Hemoglobin	7.3	g/dL	AST	25	U/L
Hematocrit	20.2	%	ALT	53	U/L
Platelets	2.3 × 104	µ/L	LDH	239	U/L
Flow cytometry			Immunology
CD3	35.2	%	CRP	5.43	mg/dL
CD4	18.7	%	KL-6	154	U/mL
CD8	20.7	%	SP-D	68.6	ng/mL
CD20	38.6	%	Beta-D-glucan	negative
			CMV antigenemia	negative
			Galactomannan antigen	negative

OPEN IN VIEWER

Figure 1.

The patient’s clinical course and changes in body temperature.

A whole-body computed tomography (CT) scan revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs, which were not observed on the baseline CT scan (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). These findings closely resembled those of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP). However, blood and sputum cultures were negative, and the patient’s serum beta-D-glucan level was not elevated. Tests for cytomegalovirus antigen and galactomannan antigen were also negative. Bronchoscopy was considered, but could not be performed because of the patient’s low platelet count. Although PCP is relatively rare in patients with myeloid neoplasms, based on the patient’s CT findings and low CD4-positive T cell count, atovaquone was administered as an empiric therapy for PCP. OPEN IN VIEWER

The patient’s symptoms spontaneously improved, but the intermittent elevation of his body temperature continued. To ameliorate his symptoms, 0.5 mg/kg prednisolone was initiated on day 18 of cycle 2, and the patient’s fever and oxygen desaturation gradually improved within a week. His CT findings were also improved on day 25 of cycle 2 (Figure 2(c)). Based on the patient’s clinical course, it was suspected that the lung injury had an immunological pathophysiology, e.g., it was tumor-related or drug-induced rather than an infectious pathophysiology.

Although azacitidine did not produce any hematological improvement, a bone marrow examination performed on day 28 of cycle 2 did not reveal any evidence of disease progression or transformation to AML. Considering these clinical benefits, a third cycle of azacitidine was started. However, the fever occurred again on day 3, and the patient’s chest CT findings worsened (Figure 2(d)). The exacerbation of the lung injury followed the course of azacitidine treatment, and there was no evidence of other infectious causes, such as bacterial, fungal, or viral infections. Thus, the patient was clinically diagnosed with azacitidine-induced ALI. The azacitidine treatment was suspended, and 1 mg/kg prednisolone was administered for 2 weeks. After the initiation of prednisolone treatment, the patient’s fever and oxygen desaturation improved markedly.

Discussion

Here, we report the case of a patient with therapy-related MDS who developed an ALI following azacitidine treatment.

The clinical and radiological features of this case resembled those of PCP. Our group previously reported that CD4-positive T-cell lymphocyte counts of ≤200/mm³ were associated with a higher risk of PCP in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. ¹⁶ Therefore, we considered the possibility of PCP at presentation, although its incidence among patients with MDS/AML is relatively low. Consequently, it was determined that the patient was not suffering from PCP or any other type of infection. As no bronchoscopy or lung biopsy examination was performed in the present case, there was no definitive evidence that would allow us to rule out etiologies other than azacitidine. However, three clinical characteristics of this case support our clinical diagnosis of an azacitidine-induced ALI. First, the ALI worsened when azacitidine was re-administered. Second, no evidence of infectious disease was detected during repeated bacterial, viral, and fungal examinations. Third, corticosteroid therapy was highly effective. The Naranjo scale, which is a classical algorithm for assessing the causes of adverse drug reactions, also suggests that a correlation exists between lung injuries and the administration of azacitidine. ¹⁷

To the best of our knowledge, including our case, there have only been nine reported cases of adverse pulmonary events related to azacitidine (Table 2). Among the nine reported cases, the median number of azacitidine treatment cycles administered before lung injuries developed was one cycle (range, 1–3). The initial symptoms of this type of ALI vary, but almost all patients exhibit fever at presentation. The CT findings also vary, but the associated lung lesions are generally bilateral and diffuse.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 2.

Reports on onazacitidine-induced lung toxicities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Author	Age/Sex	Symptoms of onset	Time of onset	CT findings	Pathological findings	Treatment	Outcome
Adams, et al. 7	71/M	fever	cycle 1	diffuse, bilateral, interstitial infiltrates	organizing pneumonitis	none	died
Hueser, et al. 8	55/F	fever	cycle 1	bilateral interstitial opacity	no biopsy	methylprednisolone 200 mg/day	improved
Nair, et al. 9	76/M	fever	cycle 2	diffuse, bilateral, patchy infiltrates	eosinophilic pneumonia	methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg, twice daily	improved
Pillai, et al. 10	74/F	fever, dry cough, dyspnea	cycle 1	peribronchiolar shadowing, bilateral lower lobe	no biopsy	methylprednisolone 1.5 g/day for 3 days	improved
Sekhri, et al. 11	56/M	fever, cough, dyspnea, hypoxia	cycle 1	extensive bilateral airspace disease, nodular opacities	organizing pneumonia	methylprednisolone	improved
Verriere, et al. 12	86/F	fever, dry cough	cycle 3	diffuse interstitial opacities, ground-grass shadowing	no biopsy	corticosteroid 0.75 mg/kg	improved
Hayashi, et al. 13	74/M	fever, dry cough, shortness of breath	cycle 1	bilateral, non-segmental consolidation with ground-glass opacities, pleural effusion	no biopsy	methylprednisolone 1 g/day for 3 days	improved
Kuroda, et al. 14	72/M	fever	cycle 1	interstitial opacities and ground-glass opacities of right upper lobe	no biopsy	methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 4 days	died
Present case	77/M	fever	cycle 2	diffuse ground-glass opacities of the bilateral lungs	no biopsy	prednisolone1 mg/kg	improved

Diffuse abnormal findings in the bilateral lungs on CT scans can be caused by various etiologies in patients with MDS/AML, such as infection, leukemic cell infiltration, extramedullary hematopoiesis, autoimmunity, and drug-induced reactions. To make a definitive diagnosis, it is necessary to perform a lung biopsy examination. However, lung biopsy examinations were not carried out in 6 out of 9 patients because of an unfavorable general condition, hypoxia, or a low platelet count. The management strategies for infectious pulmonary disease and non-infectious lung injuries are completely different; the former requires antimicrobial agents whereas the latter is most frequently treated with corticosteroids, which can worsen infectious diseases. However, physicians often must make a decision without a confirmed histological diagnosis, which requires a lung biopsy examination.

The optimal management strategy for azacitidine-induced ALI remains unknown. Our case and previous cases indicate two important facts. First, re-treatment with azacitidine should be avoided because it promotes the progression of such lung injuries. Second, corticosteroid therapy might be effective against azacitidine-induced ALI, although it increases the risk of infectious complications. Careful but prompt use of corticosteroids should be considered for managing distressing symptoms, but the further accumulation of clinical data is required to determine the optimal dose and type of corticosteroid for treating patients with azacitidine-induced ALI.

In conclusion, we report the case of a patient with MDS who experienced a rare, but critical, adverse event, an azacitidine-induced ALI, which is difficult to diagnose definitively. Azacitidine-induced ALI should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses in cases where 1) pneumonia and fever arise in MDS patients that have been treated with azacitidine, 2) antimicrobial agents are not effective, and 3) microbiological tests produce negative results.