A Cross Sectional Survey on Breast Self Examination Practice,Utilization of Breast Professional Examination,Mammography and Associated Factors in Romagna,Italy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 1992
A Cross Sectional Survey on Breast Self Examination Practice,Utilization of Breast Professional Examination,Mammography and Associated Factors in Romagna,Italy
In 1988, a cross-sectional survey was carried out in the Romagna region (Italy) to evaluate the association between knowledge of breast pathophysiology and preventive attitudes and screening tests practice for breast cancer. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a sample of asymptomatic women aged 20–64 years living in the city of Faenza (Northern Italy). Of the 657 responders, 58 % reported that they practiced breast self-examination; 55% had had a professional breast examination, and only 9 % had had a mammogram as a screening test. Logistic regression analysis (including variables such as age, education, employment) was performed to explore the relationship between screening tests practice and factors associated with their use. Breast self-examination practice (n = 590) was associated with preventive attitudes (aOR = 1.67, 95°/o CI = 1.09–2.53) and with a positive history of breast disease (aOR = 3.48, 95 % CI = 1.72–7.04). Professional breast examination (n = 480) was related to preventive attitudes (aOR = 2.37, 95 % CI = 1.51–3.71), knowledge of breast pathophysiology (aOR = 2.07, 95 % CI = 1.31–3.28), and use of oral contraceptives (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.12–2.91). Mammography use (n = 540) was associated with preventive attitudes (aOR = 3.08, 95 % CI = 1.40–6.76). The results show an inadequate utilization of screening tests in our population. Breast self-examination is strongly related to a positive history of breast disease, and this could reflect the lack of health educational programs aimed at the general population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI., FishbeinM.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior.Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1980.
2.
AnderssonI., AspegrenK., JanzonL., LandbergT., Lindholm LinellF., LjungbergO., RanstamJ., SigfussonB.: Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmoe mammographic screening trial.Br. Med. J., 297: 943–944, 1988.
3.
BainesC.J., WallC., RishH.A., KuinJ.K., FanI.J.: Changes in breast self-examination behavior in a cohort of 8214 women in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.Cancer, 57: 1209–1216, 1986.
4.
BeckerM.H., HaefnerP.D., KaslS.V., KirschtJ.P., MaimanL.A., RosenstockI.M.: Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviours.Med. Care, 15: 27–46, 1977.
5.
BennettS.E., LawrenceR.S., FleishmannK.H., GiffordC.S., SlackW.V.: Profile of women practicing breast self examination.J.A.M.A., 249: 488–491, 1983.
6.
CalnanM., RutterD.R.: Do health beliefs predict health behaviour? An analysis of breast self-examination.Soc. Sci. Med., 22: 673–678, 1986.
7.
Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VI, IARC Scientific Publication, Lyon (In press).
DayN.E., BainesC.J., ChamberlainJ., HakamaM., MillerA.B., ProrokP.: UICC project on screening for cancer: report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer.Int. J. Cancer, 38: 303–308, 1986.
10.
DayN.E., MillerA.B. (Eds.): Screening for breast cancer.UICC, Hans Huber Publishers, Toronto, 1988.
11.
EaglyA.H., HimmelfarbS.: Attitudes and opinions.Annu. Rev. Psychol., 29: 517–554, 1978.
12.
GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation):Practice of breast self examination: disease extent at diagnosis and patterns of surgical care. A report from an Italian study.J. Epidemiol. Comm. Hlth., 45: 112–116, 1991.
13.
GrayM.E.: Factors related to practice of breast self-examination in rural women.Cancer-Nurs., 13: 100–107, 1990.
14.
HarrelF.E.: The LOGIST Procedure. In: SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide. Version 5 Edition., SAS Institute Inc., pp. 269–293, Cary, NC, 1986.
15.
HaywardR.A., ShapiroM.F., FreemanH.E., CoreyC.R.: Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.Arch. Intern. Med., 48: 1177–1181, 1988.
16.
HillD., WhiteV., JolleyD., MappersonK.: Self examination of the breast: is it beneficial? Meta-analysis of studies investigating breast self examination and extent of disease in patients with breast cancer.Br. Med. J., 297: 271–275, 1988.
17.
HillD., GardnerG., RassabyJ.: Factors predisposing women to take precautions against breast and cervix cancer.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 15: 59–79, 1985.
18.
HoweH.L.: Social factors associated with breast self-examination among high-risk women.Am. J. Publ. Health, 71: 251–255, 1981.
19.
JanzN.K., BeckerM.H.: The health belief model: a decade later.Hlth. Educ. Q., 11: 1–47, 1984.
20.
JanzN.K., BeckerM.H., HaefnerD.P., RuttW.M., WeissfeldL.A.: Determinants of breast self-examination after a benign biopsy.Am. J. Prev. Med., 6: 84–92, 1990.
21.
KelmanH.L.: Attitudes are alive and well and gainfully employed in the sphere of action.Am. Psychol., 29: 310–324, 1974.
22.
KoschS.G., SpringH.: Breast self examination of women with and without benign breast disease.Fam. Pract. Res. J., 2: 171–180, 1983.
23.
La VecchiaC., NegriE., DecarliA., FasoliM., CislaghiC.: Cancer mortality in Italy: an overview of age-specific and age-standardized trends from 1955 to 1984.Tumori, 76: 87–166, 1990.
24.
MamonJ.A., ZapkaJ.G.: Breast self-examination by young women: characteristics associated with frequency.Am. J. Prev. Med., 2: 61–69, 1986.
25.
MantelN., HaenszelW.: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 22: 719–748, 1959.
26.
McCanceK.L., MooneyK.H., SmithK.R., FieldR.: Validity and reliability of breast cancer Knowledge test.Am. J. Prev. Med., 6: 93–98, 1990.
27.
MiettinenO.S.: Estimability and estimation in case-referent study.Am. J. Epidemiol., 103: 226–235, 1976a.
28.
MillerA.B., ChamberlainJ., TsechkovskiM.: Self-examination in the early detection of breast cancer. A review of the evidence with recommendations for further research.J. Chron. Dis., 38: 527–540, 1985.
29.
O'MalleyM.S., FletcherS.W.: Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination: A critical review.J.A.M.A., 257: 2196–2203, 1987.
30.
PerucciC.A., RapitiE., DavoliM., LagorioS., ArcaM., MillerA.B.: Rome women's screening study: knowledge, attitudes and practices of women regarding screening for breast and cervical cancer.Tumori, 76: 365–369, 1990.
31.
PolednakA.P., LaneD.S., BurgM.A.: Risk perception, family history, and use of breast cancer screening tests.Cancer Detect. Prevent, 15: 257–263, 1991.
32.
ReddyD.M., AlagnaS.W.: Psychological aspects of cancer prevention and early detection among women. In: Women with cancer: psychological perspectives.AndersonB.L. (Ed.), pp. 93–137, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
33.
RoncoG., SegnanN., PontiA.: Who has pap tests?: Variables associated with the use of pap tests in absence of screening programmes.Int. J. Epidemiol., 20: 349–353, 1991.
34.
SegnanN., RoncoG., PontiA.: Practice of early diagnosis of breast and uterine cervix cancer in a northern Italian town.Tumori, 76: 227–233, 1990.
35.
SemiglazowV.F., MoiseenkoV.M.: Breast self examination for the early detection of breast cancer: A URSS/WHO controlled trial in Leningrad.Bull. W.H.O., 65: 391–396, 1987.
36.
TabarL., GadA., HolmergL.H., LjungquistU., BaldetorpL., GrontoftO., LundstromB., MansonJ.C., EklundG., DayN.E., PattersonF.: Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography.Lancet, 1: 829–832, 1985.
37.
TaylorS.E., LichtmanR.R., WoodJ.V., BlumingA.Z., DosikG.M., LeibowitzR.L.: Breast self-examination among diagnosed breast cancer patients.Cancer, 54: 2528–2532, 1984.
38.
UK trial of early detection of breast cancer group:First result on mortality reduction in the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer.Lancet, 2: 411–416, 1988.
39.
VerbeekA.L.M., HedriksJ.H.C.L., HollandR., MravunacM., SturmansF., DayN.E.: Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981.Lancet, 1: 1222–1224, 1984.
40.
WoolfB.: On estimating the relationship between blood group and disease.Ann. Hum. Genet., 19: 251–253, 1955.
41.
ZapkaJ.G., StoddardA.M., CostanzaM.E., GreeneH.L.: Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.Am. J. Public Health, 79: 1499–1502, 1989.
