Abstract
Hall S, McKinstry C and Hyett N (2016) Youth perceptions of positive mental health. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78(8): 475–483. DOI:
In this article, the reference for Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) is incorrectly given as:
Law M, Polatajko H, Baptiste S, et al. (2007) Core concepts of occupational therapy. In: Townsend E and Polatajko H (eds) Enabling Occupational II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-Being and Justice Through Occupation. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapy Publications ACE.
The correct references for CMOP-E are:
Polatajko HJ, Davis J, Stewart D, Cantin N, Amoroso B, Purdie L and Zimmerman D (2007) Specifying the domain of concern: Occupation as core. In: Townsend EA and Polatajko HJ (eds) Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE, 13–36.
Polatajko HJ, Townsend EA and Craik J (2007) The Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E). In: Townsend EA and Polatajko HJ (eds) Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being, and justice through occupation. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE, 23.
The in-text citations should be as follows:
On p. 476, ‘Digital stories and workshop transcriptions were analysed thematically using the Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) (Polatajko, Townsend and Craik, 2007: 23) as the theoretical framework.’
On p. 477, ‘the CMOP-E was used as a framework for interpretation of the findings because this model demonstrates the importance of inter-relationships between personal, occupational and environmental factors (Polatajko, Davis, et al., 2007),’
On p. 478, ‘The concept of spirituality considers idiosyncratic values, personal meanings and how individuals cope in stressful circumstances (Polatajko, Davis, et al., 2007).’
On p 480, ‘Engagement in occupations provides an opportunity to connect with people socially as well as supporting identity (Polatajko, Davis, et al., 2007). Environmental factors can promote inclusion, provide an escape from stressors and provide positive occupational experiences (Polatajko, Davis, et al., 2007).’