Greg Kelly, Priscilla Haslett, Jacqueline O'Hare and Karen McDowell discuss a permanence planning project in a Northern Ireland Health and Social Services Trust. The project recruited and trained dual (foster care/adoption) approved carers and placed children with them before the children were freed for adoption. The carers who were recruited in the first year of the project (1999) are described, as are the early outcomes of the placements. All the children (n = 52) placed with the carers were subsequently adopted and no placements have disrupted in the three to six years since. The children were placed with their permanent carers earlier than in conventional practice. The carers, for the most part, thought the reward of having their child placed earlier and younger compensated for the anxiety and uncertainty generated by the legal proceedings to free the children for adoption. They were essentially people who wanted to adopt (three-quarters were childless couples) and the project provides positive evidence of the capacity of this population to offer ‘modern’ adoption placements to looked after children.
References
1.
BAAF, Planning for Permanence, Practice Note 33, 1996.
2.
DalyFGilliganR, Lives in Foster Care, Dublin: Children's Research Centre, Trinity College Dublin, 2005.
3.
Department of Health, Quality Protects, London: Department of Health, 1998.
4.
Department of Health and Social Services, Permanency Planning for Children: Adoption — Achieving the right balance, Government Circular, Belfast: DHSS, 1999.
5.
Department of Health and Social Services & Public Safety, Adopting Best Care, Belfast: DHSS & PS, 2002.
6.
Department of Health and Social Services & Public Safety, The Adoption of Looked After Children in Northern Ireland 2002–2004, Belfast: DHSS & PS, 2005.
7.
Department of Health and Social Services & Public Safety, Adopting the Future: A consultation document, Belfast: DHSS & PS, 2006.
KellyG, ‘The influence of research on child care policy and practice: the case of ‘Children Who Wait’ and the development of the permanence movement in the United Kingdom’, in IwaniecDPinkertonJ (eds), Making Research Work: Promoting child care policy and practice, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
10.
KellyG, ‘Freeing for adoption: the Northern Ireland Social Care Context’, Child Care in Practice5:3, pp 243–50, 1999.
11.
KellyGInceE, ‘Freeing for adoption in Northern Ireland: a policy analysis’, Research in Social Work Practice10:6, pp 787–800, 2000.
12.
KellyGMcSherryD, Review of the Freeing Order Processes in Northern Ireland, Belfast: DHSS & PS, 2003.
13.
LernihanU, A Study of Kinship Foster Carers in Northern Ireland in Relation to: 1. selected characteristics in the wider context of traditional foster carers, 2. the attitude of kinship foster carers to social services' involvement in their lives, Unpublished PhD thesis, Queens University Belfast, 2003.
14.
MonckEReynoldsJWigfallV, The Role of Concurrent Planning: Making permanent placements for young children, London: BAAF, 2003.
15.
NeilEHoweD, (eds), Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, theory and practice, London: BAAF, 2004.
