Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of 5% and 15% Dextrose Prolotherapy in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Retrospective Study

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of 5% and 15% dextrose prolotherapy (PrT), combined with exercise therapy and bracing, versus exercise therapy alone in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with LE, and participants were divided into three groups: exercise only (n = 29), 5% PrT + exercise (n = 30), and 15% PrT + exercise (n = 36). PrT was performed under ultrasound guidance at weeks 0, 3, and 6 targeting the forearm extensor muscles and annular ligament entheses. All patients used an epicondylitis brace and followed a 12-week home exercise program. Pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], function [patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE)], and grip strength were measured at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

Results

All groups showed significant within-group improvements in VAS, PRTEE, and grip strength. Both PrT groups had significantly greater improvements in pain and function than those of the exercise-only group at weeks 6 and 12. Grip strength in flexion was significantly higher in both PrT groups than that in the exercise group at week 12. No significant differences were found between the 5% and 15% PrT groups in extension and pinch grip strength across groups.

Conclusion

5% and 15% dextrose prolotherapy are both more effective than exercise alone in improving pain, function, and grip strength in chronic LE. The increased handgrip strength at week 12 suggests that prolotherapy may aid muscle strength recovery. The absence of significant differences between the prolotherapy groups indicates that higher concentrations of dextrose may not be necessary to achieve clinical improvement.

Keywords

lateral epicondylitis dextrose prolotherapy exercise tendinopathy grip strength disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahadi

Esmaeili Jamkarani

Raissi

G. R.

, et al. (2019). Prolotherapy vs radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short-term treatment of lateral epicondylosis: A randomized clinical trial. Pain Med, 20(9), 1745–1749. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny303

Altan

Ercan

Konur

(2010). Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation. Rheumatol Int, 30(8), 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1101-6

Apaydin

Bazancir

Altay

(2020). Injection therapy in patients with lateral epicondylalgia: Hyaluronic acid or dextrose prolotherapy? A single-blind, randomized clinical trial. J Altern Complement Med, 26(12), 1169–1175. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0188

Arias-Vázquez

P. I.

Castillo-Avila

R. G.

Tovilla-Zárate

C. A.

, et al. (2022). Efficacy of prolotherapy in pain control and function improvement in individuals with lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Efficacy of prolotherapy in pain control and function improvement in individuals with lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ARP Rheumatol, 1(2), 152–167.

Bayat

Raeissadat

S. A.

Mortazavian Babaki

, et al. (2019). Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to corticosteroid injection in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis?: A randomized clinical trial. Orthop Res Rev, 11, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S218698

Breitinger

H. G.

(2016). Augmentation of glycine receptor alpha3 currents suggests a mechanism for glucose-mediated analgesia. Neurosci Lett, 612, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.11.051

Capotosto

Nazemi

A. K.

Komatsu

D. E.

, et al. (2024). Prolotherapy in the treatment of sports-related tendinopathies: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Orthop J Sports Med, 12(11), 23259671241275087. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241275087

Chen

Hong

C. K.

Hsu

K. L.

, et al. (2025). Variations in neuromuscular functions after platelet-rich plasma and dextrose injections in chronic lateral epicondylitis: A randomized controlled study. Sports Health, 17(6), 1261–1271. Published online January, 31, https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251314056

Chevinsky

J. D.

Newman

J. M.

Shah

N. V.

, et al. (2017). Trends and epidemiology of tennis-related sprains/strains in the United States, 2010 to 2016. Surg Technol Int, 22, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119867411

10.

Chung

M. W.

Hsu

C. Y.

Chung

W. K.

, et al. (2020). Effects of dextrose prolotherapy on tendinopathy, fasciopathy, and ligament injuries, fact or myth?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 99(46), e23201. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000023201

11.

Ciftci

Y. G. D.

Tuncay

Kocak

F. A.

, et al. (2023). Is low-dose dextrose prolotherapy as effective as high-dose dextrose prolotherapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis? A double-blind, ultrasound guided, randomized controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 104(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.017

12.

Contreras-Hernandez

Falla

Martinez-Valdes

(2022). Neuromuscular and structural tendon adaptations after 6 weeks of either concentric or eccentric exercise in individuals with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 12(7), e058683. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058683

13.

Dwivedi

Sobel

A. D.

DaSilva

M. F.

, et al. (2019). Utility of prolotherapy for upper extremity pathology. J Hand Surg Am, 44(3), 236–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.021

14.

Goh

S. -L.

Jaafar

Gan

Y. -N.

, et al. (2021). Efficacy of prolotherapy in comparison to other therapies for chronic soft tissue injuries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One, 16(5), e0252204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252204

15.

Guran

Coban

Z. D.

Karasimav

, et al. (2018). Dextrose solution used for prolotherapy decreases cell viability and increases gene expressions of angiogenic and apopitotic factors. Gulhane Med J, 60(2), 42–46 https://doi.org/10.26657/gulhane.00016

16.

Kazempour Mofrad

Rezasoltani

Dadarkhah

, et al. (2021). Periarticular neurofascial dextrose prolotherapy versus physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: Randomized clinical trial. J Clin Rheumatol, 27(4), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000001218

17.

Korkmaz

M. D.

Menekseoglu

A. K.

Zure

Efficacy of prolotherapy on pain and disability in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A retrospective cohort study. Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research: International Journal of Integrated Medicine. First published online December 3 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/03601293251401746

18.

Kraushaar

B. S.

Nirschl

R. P.

(1999). Tendinosis of the elbow (tennis elbow). Clinical features and findings of histological, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopy studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199902000-00014

19.

Kwapisz

Prabhakar

Compagnoni

, et al. (2018). Platelet-rich plasma for elbow pathologies: A descriptive review of current literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 11(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9520-1

20.

Maniquis-Smigel

Dean Reeves

Rosen

H. J.

, et al. (2016). Analgesic effect of caudal 5% dextrose in water in chronic low back pain. a randomized controlled trial of epidural injection. Anesth Pain Med, 7(1), e4255. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.42550

21.

Pitts

Uhl

T. L.

Day

J. M.

(2021). Grip strength is more sensitive to changes in elbow position than isolated wrist extension strength in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy. J Hand Ther, 34(3), 509–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.019

22.

Reeves

K. D.

Sit

R. W.

Rabago

D. P.

(2016). Dextrose prolotherapy: A narrative review of basic science, clinical research, and best treatment recommendations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 27(4), 783–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2016.06.001

23.

Sayampanathan

A. A.

Basha

Mitra

A. K.

(2020). Risk factors of lateral epicondylitis: A meta-analysis. Surgeon, 18(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2019.08.003

24.

Scarpone

Rabago

D. P.

Zgierska

et al. (2008). The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: A pilot study. Clin J Sport Med, 18(3), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0b013e318170fc87

25.

Sims

S. E. G.

Miller

Elfar

J. C.

(2014). Non-surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Hand (N Y), 9(4), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9642-x

26.

Viswas

Ramachandran

Korde

A. P.

(2012). Comparison of effectiveness of supervised exercise program and Cyriax physiotherapy in patients with tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis): A randomized clinical trial. Scientific World Journal, 2012(1), 939645. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/939645

27.

Vora

A. M. D.

Borg-Stein

J. M. D.

Nguyen

R. T. M. D.

(2012). Regenerative injection therapy for osteoarthritis: Fundamental concepts and evidence-based review. PMR, 4(5), S104–S109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.02.005

28.

Wadsworth

T. G.

(1987). Tennis elbow: Conservative, surgical, and manipulative treatment. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 294(6572), 621–624. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.294.6572.621

29.

Y. T.

T. Y.

Chou

Y. C.

et al. (2017). Six-month efficacy of perineural dextrose for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc, 92(8), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.025

30.

Wuori

J. L.

Overend

T. J.

Kramer

J. F.

, et al. (1998). Strength and pain measures associated with lateral epicondylitis bracing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 79(7), 832–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90366-5

31.

Yelland

Rabago

Ryan

, et al. (2019). Prolotherapy injections and physiotherapy used singly and in combination for lateral epicondylalgia: A single-blinded randomised clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20(1), 509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2905-5