Storm Water Low-Impact Development,Conventional Structural,and Manufactured Treatment Strategies for Parking Lot Runoff

Abstract

Eleven storm water treatment strategies were evaluated for water quality performance and storm volume reduction during rainfall–runoff events between September 2004 and August 2005. Evaluated treatment strategies included structural best management practices (BMPs) (swales, retention ponds), low-impact development (LID) designs (treatment wetland, filtration and infiltration designs), and manufactured BMPs (filtration, infiltration, and hydrodynamic separators). Contaminant event mean concentration, performance efficiency, and mass-based first flush were evaluated for storms with varying rainfall–runoff characteristics. Previous research demonstrated that treatment performance of storm water control measures varies widely in response to site-specific contaminant loading functions. For that reason, the devices were tested in parallel, with a single influent source providing uniform loading to all devices. Treatment strategies were uniformly sized to target a rainfall–runoff depth equivalent to 90% of the annual volume of rainfall. Under the parallel and uniformly sized configuration, a normalized performance evaluation is possible because treatment strategies of the same scale receive runoff from events of the same duration, intensity, peak flow, volume, antecedent dry period, and watershed loading. Runoff constituent analyses included total suspended solids (TSS), total petroleum hydrocarbons-diesel, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, and total zinc. Several water quality parameters (temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity) were monitored as real-time data. Performance evaluations indicate that several LID designs have removal efficiencies of 80% to 100%. In contrast, conventional structural BMPs perform poorly for most measures except for the pond with TSS. The manufactured systems tended to vary widely and were dependent on the design and contaminant of interest.

References

Urbonas

B. R.

Doerfer

J. T.

and Tucker

L. S.

. Stormwater Sand Filtration: A Solution or a Problem? APWA Reporter, Washington, D.C., 1996.

Veenhuis

J. E.

Parish

J. H.

and Jennings

M. E.

. Monitoring and Design of Stormwater Control Basin. In Design of Urban Runoff Quality Controls. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1989.

Wanielista

M. P.

Stormwater Management Manual. University of Central Florida and State Department of Environmental Regulation, 1981.

Davis

A. P.

Shokouhian

Sharma

Minami

and Winogradoff

. Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention: Lead, Copper, and Zinc. Water Environment Research, Vol. 75, No. 1 2003, pp. 73–82.

Winogradoff

The Bioretention Manual. Prince George's County Department of Environmental Resources Programs and Planning Division, Maryland, 2001.

Davis

Shokouhian

Sharma

and Henderson

. Optimization of Bioretention Design for Water Quality and Hydrologic Characteristics. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 1998.

Design Manual for Use of Bioretention in Storm Water Management. Prepared by M. L. Clar and R. Green; Engineering Technologies Associates, Inc., Ellicott City, Md.; and Biohabitats, Inc., Towson, Md. for the Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George's County, Md., 1993.

Egan

Burroughs

and Attaway

. Packed Bed Filter. In Proc., 4th Biennial Stormwater Research Conference. SW Florida Water Management District, Clearwater, 1995.

Reuter

J. E.

Djohan

and Goldman

C. R.

. The Use of Wetlands for Nutrient Removal from Surface Runoff in a Cold Climate Region of California—Results from a Newly Constructed Wetland at Lake Tahoe. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 36, No. 1 1992, pp. 35–54.

10.

New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Nonpoint Source Management Plan. NHDES-WD-99-7. Department of Environmental Services, State of New Hampshire, Concord, 1999.

11.

Ballestero

T. P.

Jones

S. H.

and Kinner

N. E.

. Water Quality Assessment of Storm Water Control Systems. Final Report. Submitted to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–University of New Hampshire Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology, 2004.

12.

Jones

S. H.

and Langan

. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Permanent Stormwater Control Measures. Final report submitted to the New Hampshire Coastal Program, 1996.

13.

Ballestero

T. P.

Final Report on Microbial Contamination Along Route 1, North Hampton, New Hampshire. Submitted to the town of North Hampton, 1990.

14.

New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual. Prepared by Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Md., for New York State, Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, 2001.

15.

New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Best Management Practices for Urban Stormwater Runoff. Department of Environmental Services, State of New Hampshire, Concord, 1996.

16.

Brown

S. A.

Urban Drainage Design Manual Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. FHWA-SA-96-078. FHWA, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996.

17.

FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Stormwater Best Management Practices in an Ultra-Urban Setting: Selection and Monitoring. 2001. www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ultraurb/index.htm.

18.

Glenn

D. W.

III Liu

and Sansalone

J. J.

. Influence of Highway Runoff Chemistry, Hydrology, and Residence Time on Non-Equilibrium Partitioning of Heavy Metals: Implications for Treatment at the Highway Shoulder. Geology and Properties of Earth Materials. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1755, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 129–140.

19.

Stahre

and Urbonas

. Stormwater Detention for Drainage, Water Quality, and CSO Management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 2001.

20.

Sansalone

J. J.

and Cristina

C. M.

. First Flush Concepts for Suspended and Dissolved Solids in Small Impervious Watersheds. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 11 2004, pp. 1301–1314.