Computed tomography (CT) with arthrography, a method not requiring anesthesia, has worked well in cruciate ligament damage diagnosis, particularly in the detection of PCL damage and in differentiation between ACL and PCL lesions. Evidence has been produced of its superior accuracy by comparison, in the study of 40 patients, among clinical findings, findings obtained from initial radiography, and diagnostic data produced by CT alone. Reference is also made to false interpretations in the context of clinical examination and CT.
References
1.
Archer CR, Yeager V. Internal structures of the knee visualized by computed tomography J Comput Assist Tomogr2181-183, 1978
2.
Gronert H-J. , Stewin J. Moglichkeiten und Grenzen der Arthroskopie beim frischen traumatischen Kniebinnenschaden. Unfallheilk83. 108-114, 1980
3.
Li KC, Henkelman RM, Poon PY, et al MR imaging of the normal knee. J Comput Assist Tomogr8. 1147-1154, 1984
4.
Pavlov H., Freiberger HR, Deck MF, et al Computer-assisted tomography of the knee. Invest Radiol1357-62, 1978
5.
Pavlov H., Hirschy JC, Torg IS Computed tomography of the cruciate ligaments. Radiology132. 389-393, 1979
6.
Reiser M., Rupp N., Karpf PM, et al. Erfahrungen mit der CT-Arthrographie der Kreuzbander des Kniegelenkes . Rofo137372-379, 1982
7.
Reiser M., Rupp N., Karpf PM, et al. Evaluation of the cruciate ligaments by CT Eur J Radiol1: 9-15, 1981
8.
Reiser M., Rupp N., Karpf PM, et al Die Computertomographie-Arthrographie der Kreuzbander des Kniegelenkes Rontgen-Berichte 10. 266-273, 1981
9.
Reiser M., Rupp N., Pfandner K., et al. Die darstellung von kreuzbandlasionen durch die MR-tomographie . Rofo145. 193-198, 1986