This article updates the legal principles con tained in the celebrated Elrod and Branti decisions by examining the Supreme Court's more recent pronouncements in Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois. The Rutan decision extends the impact of the previous cases by going beyond patronage dismissals and granting protection to employees victimized by certain other adverse personnel prac tices. Difficulties inherent in identifying positions which may legitimately be classified as policymaking in nature are discussed, and the potential impacts on employers and employees are examined.
References
1.
Arvey, R.D. and J.E. Campion (1982). "The Employment Interview: A Summary and Review of Recent Research." Personnel Psychology35: 281-321.
2.
Ban, C. and H.C. Reed III (1990). "The State of the Merit System: Perceptions of Abuse in the Federal Civil Service." Review of Public Personnel Administration 10, 3 (Summer): 55-72.
3.
Bowman, C.G. (1991). "We Don't Want Anybody Sent: The Death of Patronage Hiring in Chicago." Northwestern University Law Review 86, 1 (Fall): 57-95.
4.
Branti v. Finkle (1980). 100 S. Ct. 1287.
5.
Elling, R.C. (1986). "Civil Service, Collective Bargaining and Personnel-Related Impediments to Effective State Management: A Comparative Assessment." Review of Public Personnel Administration6, 3:. 73-93.
6.
Elrod v. Burns (1976). 96 S. Ct. 2673.
7.
Feild, H.S. and R.D. Gatewood (1987). "Matching the Talent with the Task." Personnel Administrator 32, 4 (April): 113-126.
8.
Feuquay, J. P., ed. (1990). " Recent Innovations in Public Sector Assessment." IPMA Personel Assessment Monograph2, 2.
9.
Freedman, A. (1988). "Doing Battle with the Patronage Army: Politics, Courts, and Personnel Administration in Chicago." Public Administration Review48, (September/October) : 847-859.
10.
Gatewood, R.D. and H.S. Feild (1990). Human Resource Selection, 2nd edition. Orlando, Florida: Dryden Press-Holt, Rinehart, and Winston,.
11.
Hayford, S.L. (1985). "First Amendment Rights of Government Employees : A Primer for Public Officials." Public Administration Review 45, 1 (January/February): 241-248.
12.
Heinen, S.G. (1991). "Political Patronage and the First Amendment: Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14, 1 (Winter): 292-303.
13.
Hoffinger, R.E. (1982). "First Amendment Limitations on Patronage Employment Practices." University of Chicago Law Review49: 181-200.
14.
Hoskins, J.E. (1989). "Chicago Personnel Administration: A Management Process." Public Administration Review 49, 1 (January/February): 93-94.
15.
Illinois Commission on the Future of the Public Service: The State of Illinois (1991). Excellence in Public Service : Illinois Challenge for '90s. The Chicago Community Trust/Government Assistance Project.
16.
Illinois State Employees v. Lewis (1972). 473 F.2nd 561.
17.
Jimenez v. Gaztambide (1986). 807 F. 2d 236 (1st Cir.
18.
Johnson, C.R. (1988). "Successful Reform Litigation: The Shakman Patronage Case." Chicago-Kent Law Review64: 479-497.
19.
Katz, J.L. (1991). "The Slow Death of Patronage." Governing (April): 59-62.
20.
Martin, S.L. (1989). "A Decade of Branti Decisions: A Government Official's Guide to Patronage Dismissals." American University Law Review 39, 1 (Fall): 11-58.
21.
McFeeley, N.D. (1981). "Patronage, Public Service, and the Courts." Public Personnel Management 10, 3 (Fall): 343-351.
22.
Meier, K.J. (1981). "Ode to Patronage: A Critical Analysis of Two Recent Supreme Court Decisions." Public Administration Review 41, 5 (September /October): 558-563.
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois (1990 ). 110 S. Ct. 2729.
25.
Harvard Law Review (1990). "The Supreme Court-Leading Cases." Vol. 104: 227-237.
26.
Thompson, F.J. (1990). "The Politics of Public Personnel Administration ," pp. 3-19 in S.W. Hays and R. C. Kearney (eds.) Public Personnel Administration ; Problems and Prospects, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
27.
Wright, P.M., P.A. Lichtenfels, and E.D. Pursell (1988). The Structured Interview : Additional Studies and Meta-Analysis. University of Notre Dame, Center for Research in Business, Research Paper Series 88-07.
