This research analyzes datafrom the 1980and 1990 CurrentPopulation Surveyfiles and attempts to determine whether human capital or cultural explanations provide a viable frameworkfor understanding the experience of Hispanic women in Texas. The authors' results suggest that the low income and high rates ofpoverty experienced by these women result from structural changes in the family and in the labor market rather than from individual deficiencies (lack of "human capital") or any value system associated with Hispanic culture.
References
1.
Baca Zinn, M.
(1982). Mexican American women in the social sciences. Signs, 8, 259-272.
2.
Becker, G. S.
(1980). Human capital (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Cardenas, J. A.
, Montecel, M. R., Supik, J. D., & Harris, R. J. (1992). The Coca-Cola Valued Youth Program: Dropout prevention strategies for at-risk students. Texas Researcher, A Journal of the Texas Centerfor Education Research, 3(Winter), 111-130.
4.
Carnoy, M.
, Daley, H. M., & Ojeda, R. H. (1993). The changing economic position of Latinos in the U.S. labor market since 1939. In R. Morales & F. Bonilla (Eds.), Latinos in a changing U.S. economy (pp. 28-54). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Fernandez Kelly, M. P.
(1991). Delicate transactions: Gender, home, and employment among Hispanic women. In F Ginsburg & A. L. Tsing (Eds.), Uncertain terms: Negotiating gender in American culture (pp. 183-195). Boston: Beacon.
6.
Goldberg, G. S.
(1990). The United States: Feminization of poverty amidst plenty. In G. S. Goldberg & E. Kremen (Eds.), The feminization of poverty: Only in America? (pp. 17-58). New York: Praeger.
7.
Harris, R. J.
(1991). Trends infamily issues and laborforce patterns in Texas, 1980-1990. Report prepared for the Texas State Occupational Information Coordinating Committee (TSOICC). Austin, TX.
8.
Kossoudhi, S. A.
, & Ranney, S. 1. (1984). The labor market experience of female migrants: The case of temporary Mexican migration to the U.S.International Migration Review, 18(4), 1120-1143.
9.
Levitan, S. A.
, & Conway, E. A. (1988). Part-timers: Living on half rations. Challenge, 31(3), 9-26.
10.
Melendez, E.
& Figueroa, J. B. (1992). The effects of local labor market conditions on labor force participation of Puerto Rican, White, and Black Women. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 76-90.
11.
Mincer, J.
(1985). Intercounty comparisons of labor force trends and of related developments: An overview. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(Suppl.), S 1-S32.
12.
Mirande, A.
, & Enriquez, E. (1979). La Chicana. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Murguia, E.
(1989). Assimilation, colonialism andthe MexicanAmerican people. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
14.
Neidert, L. J.
, & Tienda, M. (1984). Converting education into earnings: The patterns among Hispanic origin men. Social Science Research, 13, 303-320.
15.
Reimers, C.
(1985). Acomparative analysis of the wages of Hispanics, Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites. In G. Borjas & M. Tienda (Eds.), Hispanics in the U.S. economy (pp. 27-75). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Rogers, R.
(1985). Migration theory and practice. In W. Connor (Ed.), Mexican-Americans in comparative perspective (p. 204-204). Washington DC: Urban Institute.
17.
Segura, D. A.
(1992). Walking on eggshells: Chicanas in the labor force. In S. B. Knouse, P. Rosenfeld, & A. L. Culbertson (Eds.), Hispanics in the workplace (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Smith, S. A.
, & Tienda, M. (1988). The doubly disadvantaged: Women of color in the U.S. labor force. In A. Stromberg & S. Harkess (Eds.), Women working (2nd ed., pp. 61-80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Tienda, M.
(1980). Familism and structural assimilation of Mexican immigrants in the United States. International Migration Review, 14, 383-408.
20.
Tienda, M.
(1982). Sex, ethnicity and Chicano status attainment. International Migration Review, 16(2), 435-472.
21.
Tienda, M.
, & Guhleman, P. (1985). The occupational position of employed Hispanic women. In G. J. Borjas & M. Tienda (Eds.), Hispanics in the U.S. economy (pp. 243-273). New York: Academic Press.
22.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. (1978). The Current Population Survey: design and methodology. (Technical Paper 40.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23.
Williams, N.
(1990). The Mexican American family: Tradition and change. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.
24.
Ybarra, L.
(1988). Separating myth from reality: Socio-economic and cultural influences on Chicanas and the world of work. In M. B. Melville (Ed.), Mexicans at work in the United States (pp. 12-23). Houston, TX: University of Houston, Mexican American Studies.
25.
Zopf, P. E., Jr.
(1989). American women in poverty. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
