The study examines the development of the registers of academic writing by African American college-level students through style and grammar: indirection inherent in the oral culture of the African American community and the paratactic functions of because. Discourse analysis of 74 samples of academic writing by 20 African American undergraduate students and of 61 samples by a control group showed that first, only African American subjects used indirection; second, paratactic functions of because were significantly more prevalent among African American students than in the control group; and third, among African American students, those from low-income families showed statistically significant higher frequencies of the use of both indirection and paratactic because. A relationship of hierarchy in the uses of indirection and paratactic because was also evident in the data.
Abraham, E. (1991). Why “because”? The management of given/new information as a constraint on the selection of causal alternatives. Text, 11, 323-339.
2.
Abrahams, R. D. (1964). Deep down in the jungle...Negro narrative folklore from the streets of Philadelphia. Hatboro, PA: Folklore.
3.
Altenberg, B. (1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica, 38, 20-69.
4.
Bakhtin, M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(6), 12-49.
5.
Bakhtin, M., Emerson, C., & Holquist, M. (Eds.) (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
6.
Balester, V. M. (1993). Cultural divide: A study of African American college-level writers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton.
7.
Ball, A. F. (1992). Cultural preference and the expository writing of African American adolescents. Written Communication, 9, 501-532.
8.
Ball, A. F. (1995). Text design patterns in the writing of the urban African American students: Teaching to the cultural strengths of students in multicultural settings. Urban Education, 30, 253-289.
9.
Baugh, J. (1983). Black street speech. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
10.
Beaman, K. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 45-80). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Biber, D. (1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1994). (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Bocharov, S. G. (2000). (Ed.). Avtor I Geroi: K Filosofskim Osnovam Gumanitarnih Nauk [Author and hero: Towards the philosophical basics of humanities]. Sanct-Peterburg: Azbuka.
15.
Chafe, W. L. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance,& A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105-123). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Chafe, W. L. (1988). Linking intonation units in spoken English. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp.1-27). Philadelphia: J. Benjamin’s.
17.
Chapman, M. L. (1999). Situated, social, active: Rewriting genre in the elementary classroom. Written Communication, 16, 469-490.
18.
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
Eckert, P., & Rickford, J. R. (Eds.). (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Ferguson, C. A. (1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12, 153-172.
21.
Ferguson, C. A. (1994). Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventialization. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 15-30). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Ford, C. E. (1993). Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Ford, C. E. (1994). Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text, 14, 531-554.
24.
Gates, H. L., Jr. (1990). The blackness of blackness: A critique of the sign and the signifying monkey. In H. L. Gates, Jr. (Ed.), Black literature and literary theory (pp. 285-321). New York: Routledge.
25.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
Halliday, M. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
27.
Halliday, M. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interaction of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
28.
Halliday, M. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In R. Horowitz & J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 55-81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29.
Halliday, M. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Heath, S. B. (1989). Oral and literate traditions among Black Americans living in poverty. American Psychologist, 44, 367-373.
32.
Johnson, K. (1972). The vocabulary of race. In T. Kochman (Ed.), Rappin’and stylin’out: Communication in urban Black America (pp.140-151). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
33.
Lee, C. D. (1993). Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre (pp. 149-173). Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.
34.
Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
Mitchell Kernan, C. (1971). Language behavior in a Black urban community. Monographs of the Language-Behavior Research Laboratory. Number 2. Berkley, CA: UC Language-Behavior Research Laboratory.
36.
Mitchell Kernan, C. (1972). Signifying, loud-talking and marking. In T. Kochman (Ed.), Rappin’ and stylin’out: Communication in urban Black America (pp. 315-335). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
37.
Morgan, M. (1989). From down south to up south: The language behavior of three generations of Black women residing in Chicago. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pensylvania.
38.
Morgan, M. (1996). Conversational signifying: Grammar and indirectness among African American women. In E. Ochs, E. E. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 405-434). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Peck MacDonald, S. (2002). Prose styles, genres, and levels of analysis. Style, 36, 618-639.
40.
Rutherford, W. E. (1970). Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language, 46, 97-115.
41.
Schiffrin, D. (1985). Multiple constraints on discourse options: A quantitative analysis of causal sequences. Discourse Processes, 8, 281-303.
42.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (1989). Functions of because in spoken discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
43.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (1991). Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 121-135.
44.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (1996). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics, 17, 271-285.
45.
Smitherman, G. (1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
Smitherman, G. (1994). “The blacker the berry, the sweeter the juice”: African American student writers. In A. H. Dyson & C. Genishi (Eds.), The need for story: Cultural diversity in class and community (pp. 80-101). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
47.
Smitherman, G. (2000). Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America. New York: Routledge.
48.
Syrquin, A. F. (2004). Register preferences in the academic writing of African American students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Miami.
49.
Thompson, S. A. (1984). “Subordination” in formal and informal discourse. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 85-94). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
