According to contrastive rhetoric research, Japanese expository prose is characterized by a classical style (ki-sho-ten-ketsu), reader responsibility, and an inductive style with a sudden topic shift. It is claimed that English readers have difficulty comprehending texts written by Japanese writers because of such culturally unique conventions. This article challenges these hypotheses concerning the uniqueness of Japanese texts. It argues that previous studies tend to view language and culture as exotic and static rather than dynamic, and overgeneralize the cultural characteristics from a few specific examples. Also, these characterizations of Japanese written discourse can be challenged by multiple interpretations of ki-sho-ten-ketsu offered by composition specialists in Japan and the linguistic and educational influences from the West on the development of modern Japanese since the mid-19th century. This article suggests that researchers and writing teachers should be wary of stereotyping cultural conventions of writing.
References
1.
Aihara, S.
(1984). Bunsho hyogen no kisoteki kenkyu [A basic study on writing text]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
2.
Aronowitz, S.
, & Giroux, H. (1985). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal, and radical debate over schooling. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
3.
Asad, T.
(1986). The concept of cultural translation in British social anthropology. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 141-164). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
6.
Befu, H.
(1987). Ideorogi toshite no nihon bunkaron [Japanese cultural uniqueness as an ideology]. Tokyo: Shiso no kagakusha.
7.
Bloch, J.
, & Chi, L. (1995). A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 231-274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Clifford, J.
(1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Connor, U.
(1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Eggington, W. G.
(1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 153-168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
Fairclough, N.
(1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
12.
Giroux, H. A.
(1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
13.
Giroux, H. A.
(1991). Introduction: Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Redrawing the boundaries of educational discourse. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics: Rethinking educational boundaries (pp. 1-59). Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
Grabe, W.
, & Kaplan, R. B. (1989). Writing in a second language: Contrastive rhetoric. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 263-283). New York & London: Longman.
15.
Hayamizu, H.
(1976). Setsumeibun no kakikata [How to write exposition]. In D. Hayashi, S. Shiro, & K. Morioka (Eds.), Gendai sakubun koza 4: Sakubun no katei [Modern composition seminar 4: Process of composition] (pp. 145-175). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
16.
Hikita, K.
(1981). Tensei Jingo: 7. Tokyo: Asahi Shinbunsha.
17.
Hinds, J.
(1980). Japanese expository prose. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 117-158.
18.
Hinds, J.
(1981). Paragraph structure in Japanese expository prose. In S. Makino (Ed.), Papers from the Middlebury Symposium on Japanese Discourse Analysis (pp. 10-66). Urbana: University of Illinois-Urbana.
19.
Hinds, J.
(1983a). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3(2), 183-195.
20.
Hinds, J.
(1983b). Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: Contrastive studies: English and Japanese. In R. B. Kaplan, A. d'Anglejan, J. R. Cowan, B. B. Kachru, & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 78-84). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21.
Hinds, J.
(1984). Retention of information using a Japanese style of presentation. Studies in Language, 8, 45-69.
22.
Hinds, J.
(1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Hinds, J.
(1990). Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In U. Connor & A. M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 87-109). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
24.
Ichikawa, T.
(1978). Kokugo kyoiku no tame no bunshoron gaisetsu [Introduction to rhetoric for Japanese language education]. Tokyo: Kyoiku Shuppan.
25.
Inoue, S.
, & Okuma, T. (1985). Jugyo ni yakudatsu bunshoron buntairon [Theories of texts and styles for classrooms]. Tokyo: Kyoiku Shuppan.
26.
Ishiwata, T.
(1971). Gendai no goi [Contemporary vocabulary]. In A. Sakakura (Ed.), Koza kokugo shi: Goi shi [Seminar, history of Japanese: History of vocabulary] (pp. 347-411). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
27.
Kabashima, T.
(1980). Bunsho koseiho [Methods of text organization]. Tokyo: Kodansha.
28.
Kachru, B. B.
(Ed.). (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
Kachru, Y.
(1988). Writers in Hindi and English. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures (pp. 109-137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Kachru, Y.
(1995). Contrastive rhetoric in world Englishes. English Today, 41(1), 21-31.
31.
Kaplan, R. B.
(1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
32.
Kaplan, R. B.
(1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition. TESOL Quarterly, 1(4), 10-16.
33.
Kaplan, R. B.
(1972). The anatomy of rhetoric: Prolegomena to a functional theory of rhetoric. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.
34.
Kaplan, R. B.
(1988). Contrastive rhetoric and second language learning: Notes towards a theory of contrastive rhetoric. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures (pp. 275-304). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Kinoshita, K.
(1990). Repoto no kumitate kata [How to organize academic papers]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.
36.
Kobayashi, H. (1984). Rhetorical patterns in English and Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, New York.
37.
Kokai, E.
, & Fukasawa, C. (1982). Gendai no bunsho: “Ikita bunsho” o kaku tame ni [Modern writing: For writing vivid texts]. Tokyo: Yuseido Shuppan.
38.
Kokai, E.
, Ichikawa, K., & Harada, K. (1989). Kokosei no tame no kiso kara no sakubun [Writing from the basics for high school students]. Tokyo: Yuseido.
39.
Kubota, R. (1992). Contrastive rhetoric of Japanese and English: A critical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Education, University of Toronto.
40.
Kubota, R.
(in press). An investigation of L1-L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing.
41.
Land, R. E.
, & Whitley, C. (1989). Evaluating second language essays in regular composition classes; Toward a pluralistic U.S. rhetoric. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 284-293). New York & London: Longman.
42.
Maynard, S.
(1996). Presentation of one's view in Japanese newspaper columns: Commentary strategies and sequencing. Text, 16(2), 391-421.
43.
McCagg, P.
(1996). If you can lead a horse to water, you don't have to make it drink: Some comments on reader and writer responsibilities. Multilingua, 15(3), 239-256.
44.
McLaren, P. L.
(1988). Culture or canon? Critical pedagogy and the politics of literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 58(2), 213-234.
45.
Minami, H.
(1980). Nihonjinron no keifu [A history of the theories of the Japanese]. Tokyo: Kodansha.
46.
Mo, J. C.
(1982). A study of English reading comprehension from the point of view of discourse function. English Teaching and Learning, 6, 39-48. (In Chinese)
47.
Mohan, B.
, & Lo, W. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515-534.
48.
Morioka, K.
(1963). Bunsho kosei ho: Bunsho no shindan to chiryo (Methods of text organization: Diagnoses and remedies of texts). Tokyo: Shibundo.
49.
Morioka, K.
(1972). Gendai no gengo seikatsu (Contemporary language use). In K. Sato (Ed.), Koza kokugo shi: Buntai shi, gengo shi, gengo seikatsu shi [Seminar, history of Japanese: History of text styles and language use] (pp. 361-434). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
50.
Nagano, M.
(1972). Bunshoron shosetsu [A detailed guide to text grammar]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
51.
Nagano, M.
(1986). Bunshoron sosetsu [A complete guide to text grammar]. Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
52.
Namekawa, M.
(1977). Nihon sakubun tsuzurikata kyoikushi 1 (Meiji hen) [History of teaching writing in Japan, 1 (Meiji Period)]. Tokyo: Kokudosha.
53.
Namekawa, M.
(1978). Nihon sakubun tsuzurikata kyoikushi 2 (Taisho hen) [History of teaching writing in Japan, 2 (Taisho Period)]. Tokyo: Kokudosha.
54.
Odlin, T.
(1989). Language transfer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Oi, M. K. (1984). Cross-cultural differences in rhetorical patterning: A study of Japanese and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
56.
Okuma, G.
(1976). Ronshobun no kakikata (How to write argumentation). In D. Hayashi, S. Shiro, & K. Morioka (Eds.), Gendai sakubun koza 4: Sakubun no Katei [Modern composition seminar 4: Process of composition] (pp. 177-209). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
57.
Okuma, H.
(1983). Bunsho no jozuna kakikata [Methods of skillful writing]. Tokyo: Jiji Tsushinsha.
58.
Okuma, T.
(1994). Sakubun, tsuzurikata kyoiku no tankyu [Exploration of teaching writing and composition]. Tokyo: Kyoiku Shuppan.
59.
Ostler, S. E.
(1987). English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 177-205). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
60.
Reid, J.
(1989). English as second language composition in higher education: The expectations of the academic audience. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 220-234). New York & London: Longman.
61.
Roller, C. M.
(1990). The interaction between knowledge and structure variables in the processing of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(2), 79-89.
62.
Rubin, D. L.
, Goodrum, R., & Hall, B. (1990). Orality, oral-based culture, and the academic writing of ESL learners. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 56-76.
63.
Sa'adeddin, M.A.M.
(1989). Text development and Arabic-English negative interference. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 36-51.
64.
Said, E. W.
(1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
65.
Sanada, S.
(1987). Hyojungo no seiritsu jijo [The establishment of standard language]. Tokyo: PHP Kenkyujo.
66.
Sawada, A.
(1977). Ronbun no kakikata [How to write papers]. Tokyo: Kodansha.
67.
Swales, J.
(1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Takamori, K.
(1979). Kindai kokugo kyoikushi [A history of the modern education of Japanese]. Tokyo: Hatonomori shobo.
69.
Takemata, K.
(1976). Genko Shippitsu Nyumon [An introduction to writing manuscripts]. Tokyo: Natsumesha.
70.
Tannen, D.
(1985). Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 124-147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Taylor, G.
, & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 319-336.
72.
Tokoro, K.
(1986). Nihongo: Shiko no retorikku [Japanese: The rhetoric of thoughts]. Tokyo: Takumi Shuppan.
73.
Tsao, F.-F.
(1983). Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: English and Mandarin. In R. B. Kaplan, A. d'Anglejan, J. R. Cowan, B. B. Kachru, & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 99-117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
74.
Twine, N.
(1984). The adoption of punctuation in Japanese script. Visible Language, 18(3), 229-237.
75.
Twine, N.
(1991). Language and the modern state: The reform of written Japanese. London: Routledge.
76.
Volosinov, V. N.
(1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & E. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
Yamamoto, M.
(1965). Kindaibuntai hassei no shiteki kenkyu [A historical study of the development of modern written style]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
78.
Yanabu, A.
(1981). Nihongo o do kakuka [How do we write Japanese?]. Kyoto: PHP Kenkyujo.
79.
Yanabu, A.
(1982). Obun honyaku to gendai kyotsu bun [Translation of European languages and modern standard sentences]. In K. Morioka, H. Miyaji, H. Teramura, & Y. Kawabata (Eds.), Koza nihongogaku 7: Buntai shi [Japanese linguistics seminar 7: History of text types] (pp. 73-94). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.
