The question of how and when to graduate students with disabilities has become an engaging issue for parents and public school personnel. This article examines the legal and practice considerations regarding high school graduation, including graduation standards, minimum competency testing, and termination of services. Recommendations are provided on how school districts can establish a process for graduating students with disabilities within the legal framework of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
References
1.
Board of Education v. Ambach, 458 N.Y.S. 2d 680 (1982).
2.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
3.
Brookhart v. Illinois State Board of Education , 697 F. 2d 179 (7th Cir. 1983).
4.
Butler-Nalin, P., & Padilla, C. (1989). Dropout: The relationship of student characteristics, behaviors, and performance for special education students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
5.
Center for Policy Options in Special Education. ( 1994). Issues and options in outcomes-based accountability for students with disabilities. College Park: Westat, Inc. and University of Maryland.
6.
Chuhran v. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools, 51 F. 3d 271 (6th Cir. 1995).
7.
Daugherty v. Hamilton County Schools, 21 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Tenn. 1997).
8.
Davila, R.R. (1991). America 2000: A challenging opportunity for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 5.
9.
Debra P. v. Turlington, 654 F. 2d. 1079 (5th Cir. 1981).
10.
Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children, 53, 555-561.
11.
Edgar, E. (1997). School reform, special education, and democracy . Remedial and Special Education, 18, 323-325.
12.
ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (1988). Graduation requirements, adults services, and the transition of students with handicaps. (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 825)
13.
Freedman, M.K. (1997). Testing, grading and granting diplomas to special education students (Special Report No. 18). Horsham, PA : LRP Publications.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1401.
15.
Helms v. Independent School District No. 3 of Broken Arrow, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, 750 F. 2d. 820 (10th Cir. 1984)
16.
Hepburn, L.R., & White, R.A. (1990). School dropouts: A two-generation problem. Athens: University of Georgia. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 328631).
17.
Johnson, J., & Rusch, F. (1993). Educational reform and special education: Foundations for a national research agenda focused upon secondary education. In P. Kohler, J. Johnson, J. Rusch, & F. Rusch (Eds.), Transition from school to adult life: Foundations, best practices, and research directions (pp. 78-104). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358607)
18.
Kortering, L., Julnes, R., & Edgar, E. (1990). An instructive review of the law pertaining to the graduation of special education students. Remedial and Special Education, 11(4), 7-13.
19.
Lefant v. District of Columbia Board of Education , No. 80-133, 3, Education of the Handicapped Law Reporter, 522:272 (D.D.C., September, 1980)
20.
Medrich, E.A., Brown, C.L., Henke, R.R., Ross, L., & McArthur, E. (1992). Overview and inventory of state requirements for school coursework and attendance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 619)
21.
Hawaii State Department of Education. (1990). OCR Rulings, 17 EHLR 360.
22.
Burrell (PA) School District. (1995). OCR Rulings, 22 IDELR 512.
23.
Mobile (AL) County School District. (1995). OCR Rulings, 23 IDELR 353.
24.
Runkel. (1996). OCR Rulings, 25 IDELR 387.
25.
Metropolitan (TN) Public School District. (1991). OCR Rulings, 18 IDELR 971.
26.
Moffat County (CO) School District RE-1. (1996). OCR Rulings, 26 IDELR 28.
27.
Anonymous. (1994). OSEP, 22 IDELR 456.
28.
Anonymous. (1996). OSEP, 25 IDELR 632.
29.
Richards. (1990). OSERS, 17 EHLR 288.
30.
Phillips, S.E. (1993). Legal implications of high-stakes assessment: What states should know. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370985)
31.
Puffer v. Raynolds, 761 F. Supp. 838 at 857 (D. Mass. 1988).
32.
Rose v. Simi Valley Unified School District, 26 IDELR 1300 (9th Cir. 1997).
33.
Rumberger, R.W. (1987). High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence . Review of Educational Research, 55, 415-433.
34.
Huntsville City (AL) Board of Education, 21 IDELR 767 (SEA 1994).
35.
Mason City Community School District, 21 IDELR 241 (SEA IA 1994).
36.
Mason City Community School District, 21 IDELR 248 (SEA IA 1994).
37.
Walpole Public Schools, 22 IDELR 1075 (SEA MA 1995).
38.
Arlington Central School District, 28 IDELR 1130 (SEA NY 1998).
39.
Hamilton County Schools, 23 IDELR 772 (SEA TN 1996).
40.
Rockwall Independent School District, 21 IDELR 403 (SEA TX 1994).
41.
Marlin Independent School District, 29 IDELR 285 (SEA TX 1998).
42.
Mount Abraham Union Schools, 21 IDELR 972 (SEA VT 1994).
43.
Sebring, P., Campbell, B., Glusberg, M., Spencer, B., & Singleton, M. (1987). High school and beyond. 1980 sophomore cohort. Third follow-up (1986). (Data Users Manual). Washington, DC: Center for Education Statistics.
44.
Stock v. Massachusetts Hospital School, 467 N. E. 2d 448 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts 1984).
45.
Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., & Anderson, C. (1995). High school graduation requirements: What's happening for students with disabilities? Synthesis report 20 (NCEO Synthesis Report) . Minneapolis: Minnesota University, College of Education.
46.
Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J.E., & Reid, C.L. (1997). High school graduation requirements for students with disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 608-616.
47.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA . Washington, DC: Author.
48.
Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman, L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
49.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., D'Amico, R., Jay, E.D., Butler-Nalin, P., Marder, C., & Cox, R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing?Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
50.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York : Basic Books.
51.
Yankton School District v. Schramm, 93 F. 3d 1369 (8th Cir. 1996).
