Rural America’s economy, culture, and landscape have entered a period of sustained and dramatic change. Patterns of land use and the context of development are increasingly driven by natural resource-based amenity values. Planners face a new breed of economic, social, and environmental issues brought about by this rapid change in land use; driven, in large part, by demands for rural residential developments and recreationally-oriented land uses. This annotated bibliography has been compiled as a primer to the academic literature that relates to this phenomenon.
References
1.
American Society of Planning Officials
. 1976. Subdividing rural America: Impacts of recreational lot and second home development. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality, and the Office of Policy Development and Research, Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2.
Arendt, Randall
. 1994. Rural by design: Maintaining small town character. Chicago: American Planning Association.
3.
Beale, Calvin L.
, and Kenneth M. Johnson. 1998. The identification of recreational counties in nonmetropolitan areas of the USA. Population Research and Policy Review17: 37-53.
4.
Bennett, D. Gordon
. 1996. Implications of retirement development in high-amenity nonmetropolitan coastal areas. Journal of Applied Gerontology15, 3: 345-360.
5.
Beyers, William B.
, and Peter B. Nelson. 2000. Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan West: New insights from rapidly growing communities. Journal of Rural Studies16: 459-474.
6.
Booth, Douglas E.1999. Spatial patterns in the economic development of the Mountain West. Growth and Change30: 384-405.
7.
Coppock, J. T.
, ed. 1977. Second homes: Curse or blessing?Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
8.
Deller, S. C.
, Tsung-Hsiu Tsai, D. W. Marcouiller, and D.B.K. English. 2001. The role of amenities and quality-of-life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics83, 2: 352-365.
9.
Dissart, Jean Christophe
, and Steven C. Deller. 2000. CPL Bibliography 360: Quality-of-life in the planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature15, 1: 135-161.
10.
English, Donald B. K.
, David W. Marcouiller, and H. Ken Cordell. 2000. Tourism dependence in rural America: Estimates and effects. Society & Natural Resources13: 185-202.
11.
Esparza, Adrian
, and John Carruthers. 2000. Land use planning and exurbanization in the rural Mountain West. Journal of the American Planning Association20: 23-36.
12.
Gillespie, Andrew
, and Ronald Richardson. 2000. Teleworking and the city: Myths of workplace transcendence and travel reduction. In Cities in the telecommunications age: The fracturing of geographies, J. O. Wheeler, Y. Aoyama, and B. Warf, eds. New York: Routledge.
13.
Godbey, Geoffrey
, and Malcolm I. Bevins. 1987. The life cycle of second home ownership: A case study. Journal of Travel Research25, 3: 18-22.
14.
Graham, Stephen
, and Simon Marvin. 2000. Urban planning and the technological future of cities. In Cities in the telecommunications age: The fracturing of geographies, J. O. Wheeler, Y. Aoyama, and B. Warf, eds. New York: Routledge.
15.
Greason, Michael C.1989. Here a parcel, there a parcel—Fragmented forests. The Conservationist44, 1: 46-49.
16.
Helling, Amy
, and Patricia Mokhtarian. 2001. Worker telecommunication and mobility in transition: Consequences for planning. Journal of Planning Literature15, 4: 511-525.
17.
Jepson, E. J.
, D. W. Marcouiller, and S. C. Deller. 1997. CPL bibliographies 338, 339, and 340: Incorporating market and nonmarket values into regional planning for rural development. Journal of Planning Literature12, 2: 220-257.
18.
Johnson, Kenneth M.
, and Calvin L. Beale. 1998. The rural rebound. Wilson Quarterly22, 2: 16-27.
19.
Johnson, Kenneth M.
, and Glenn V. Fuguitt. 2000. Continuity and change in rural migration patterns, 1950-1995. Rural Sociology65, 1: 27-49.
20.
LaRoe, E. T.
, G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Macs, eds. 1995. Our living resources: A report on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals, and ecosystems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service.
21.
Marcouiller, David W.
, and Gary Paul Green. 2000. Outdoor recreation and rural development. In National parks and rural development: Practice and policy in the United States, G. E. Machlis and D. R. Field, eds. Washington, DC: Island Press.
22.
Marcouiller, D. W.1995. CPL bibliography 316: Tourism planning. Chicago: American Planning Association.
23.
McGranahan, David A.1999. Natural amenities drive rural population change. Agricultural Economic Report No. 781. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
24.
Nelson, Peter B.1997. Migration, sources of income, and community change in the nonmetropolitan Northwest. Professional Geographer49, 4: 418-430.
25.
Nord, M.
, and J. B. Cromartie. 1997. Migration: The increasing importance of rural natural amenities. Choices3: 22-23.
26.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
. 1999. Cultivating rural amenities: An economic development perspective. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27.
Ploch, Louis A.1978. The reversal in migration patterns—Some rural development consequences. Rural Sociology43, 2: 293-303.
28.
Rudzitis, Gundars
. 1999. Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural West. Rural Development Perspectives14, 2: 9-13.
29.
Shumway, J. Matthew
, and James A. Davis. 1996. Nonmetropolitan population change in the Mountain West: 1970-1995. Rural Sociology61, 3: 513-529.
