Exit Plans for Students with Disabilities Attending Separate Approved Special Education Programs in the Private Sector

Abstract

The exit plans of 1,632 students from 15 states attending 92 approved, out-of-district special education programs in the private sector were studied, via a survey instrument, including programs for medical disorders, pervasive developmental and/or communication disorders, and emotional and behavioral disorders. Results indicate that students from programs for medical and pervasive developmental/ communication disorders were likely to plan transfers to self-contained programs within their districts, whereas students from emotional/behavioral disorders programs tended to plan transfers to other approved, private programs outside their districts. Among the graduates/aged-out students, those leaving medical and emotional/behavioral disorders programs were likely to plan pursuit of mainstream postschool activities, whereas those from pervasive developmental/communication disorders programs tended to make postschool plans to enter vocational rehabilitation programs. Follow-up studies are needed to determine the degree to which these plans were actually carried out over time.

References

Benz, M.R. , Lindstrom, L. , & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509-529.

Blackorby, J. , & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-413.

Browning, P. , Dunn, C. , Rabren, K. , & Wetstone, M. (1995). Post-school outcomes for students with disabilities: A U.S. synopsis. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation , 10, 31-37.

Chambers, J.G. , Parrish, T.B. , & Harr, J.J. (2002). What are we spending on Special Education Services in the United States, 1999-2000? (Contract No. ED99CO 0091). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

Halpern, A.S. (1993). Quality of life as a conceptual framework for evaluating transition outcomes. Exceptional Children, 59, 486-498.

Halpern, A.S. (1994). The transition of youth with disabilities to adult life: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition Council for Exceptional Children. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 115-124.

Heal, L.W. , & Rusch, F.R. (1995). Predicting employment for students who leave special education high school programs. Exceptional Children, 61, 472-487.

Johnson, D.R. , McGrew, K.S. , Bloomberg, L. , Bruininks, R.H. , & Lin, H.C. (1997). Results of a national follow-up study of young adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 25, 119-133.

Johnson, J.R. , & Rusch, F.R. (1993). Secondary special education and transition Services . Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 1-18.

10.

Lindstrom, L.E. , & Benz, M.R. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children , 69, 67-83.

11.

Malmgren, K. , Edgar, E. , & Neel, R.S. (1998). Postschool status of youths with behavioral disorders . Behavioral Disorders, 23, 257-263.

12.

National Center on Educational Outcomes. ( 1993). Educational outcomes and indicators for students completing school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Author.

13.

Sample, P. (1998). Postschool outcomes for students with significant emotional disturbance following best-practice transition services. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 231-242.

14.

Schmidt-Davis, H. , Hayward, B.J. , & Kay, Jr., H.B. (2000). Basic skills and labor market success: Findings from the vocational rehabilitation longitudinal study . American Rehabilitation, 25, 11-23.

15.

SRI International. (1993). The National Longitudinal Transition Study: A summary of findings (Contract No. 300-87-0054). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.

16.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2001). Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

U.S. Department of Education (2002). President's Commission of Excellence in Special Education report: A new era: Reuitalizing special education for children and their families . Washington, DC: Author.

20.

Wagner, M.M. (1995). Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood. The Future of Children , 5, 90-112.

21.

Wagner, M. , Blackorby, J. , Cameto, R. , & Newman, L. (1993). What makes a difference? Influences on postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The third comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.