A pretest—posttest control group experimental design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of EnvisionIT, a 10-unit web-based curriculum designed to teach secondary students information technology (IT) skills in the context of transition-planning activities. Fifteen high schools were stratified by socioeconomic status and randomly assigned to the EnvisionIT experimental condition or a control condition in which students received traditional instruction. Pre- and posttest data for 287 students—119 (41%) of whom had disabilities—were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling. Findings indicated that students in the experimental group made significantly greater gains in IT literacy than students in the control group. Students in the experimental group also showed greater gains in several transition skills, including goal setting, knowledge of how to find jobs, and information about college. Results support the conclusion that the EnvisionIT curriculum produces improvements in students’ acquisition of the 21st-century skills needed for success in today’s high tech world.
Association of College and Research Libraries. ( 2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.acrl.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm
2.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. ( 1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-413.
3.
Brand, B. ( 2004). Transforming the American high school: Lessons learned and struggles ahead. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
4.
Brolin, D.E., & Loyd, R.J. ( 2004). Career development and transition services: A functional life skills approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall .
5.
Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Wagner, M. ( 2004). Transition planning for students with disabilities: A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2004_11/nlts2_report_2004_11_complete.pdf
6.
Carlson, E., Chen, L., Schroll, K., & Klein, S. ( 2003, March 24). SPeNSE (Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education): Final report of the paperwork substudy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ferdig.coe.ufl.edu/spense/Finalpaperworkreport3-24-031.doc
7.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Compton, D., Coyne, M.Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. ( 2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
8.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
9.
International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from the Educational Testing Service Web site: http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/ICTREPORT.pdf
10.
Izzo, M.V., McArrell, B., Yurick. A. , & Murray, A. (in press). EnvisionIT. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Nisonger Center.
11.
Kochhar-Bryant, C.A., & Bassett, D.S. ( 2002). Aligning transition and standards-based education: Issues and strategies. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
Mechling, L.C., & Ortega-Hurndon, F. (2007). Computer-based video instruction to teach young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities to perform multiple step, job tasks in a generalized setting. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 24-37.
13.
National Center for Education Statistics. (March, 2005). Computer technology in the public school classroom: Teacher perspectives. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005083.pdf
14.
National Council on Disability. (2009, March 31). National disability policy: A progress report. Retrieved from http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/index.htm
15.
Nelson, J.R., Smith, D.J., & Dodd, J.M. ( 1994). The effects of learning strategy instruction on the completion of job applications by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 104-110.
16.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
17.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002 ). Learning for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=29&Itemid=185
18.
Rylance, B.J. ( 1998). Predictors of post-high school employment for youth identified as severely emotionally disturbed. Journal of Special Education , 32, 184-192.
19.
Shinn, M.R., & Shinn, M.M. ( 2006). Administration and scoring of reading MAZE for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation, Inc.
20.
Stodden, R., & Johnson, D.R. ( 2004, April). Overview of secondary education and transition: Implications for current practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Convention and Expo, New Orleans, LA.
21.
Test, D.W., & Algozzine, B. ( 2009). From the editors. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 68-69.
22.
Test, D.W., Mustian, A., Mazzotti, V.L., & White, J. ( 2009, April). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Conference, Seattle, WA.
23.
U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Career guide to industries (Bulletin 2601). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. ( 2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_04/nlts2_report_2005_04_complete.pdf
25.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. ( 2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) . Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2005_06/nlts2_report_2005_06_complete.pdf
26.
Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Levine, P., & Marder, C. ( 2003). Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_12/nlts2_report_2003_12_complete.pdf
27.
Wandry, D.L., Webb, K.W., Williams, J.M., Bassett, D.S., Asselin, S.B., & Hutchinson, S.R. (2008). Teacher candidates’ perceptions of barriers to effective transition programming. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 14-25.
