Adolescent girls must contend with several sets of competing expectations at the discursive intersection of sexuality, age, gender, and race. This article examines how a feminist mentorship program for early adolescent girls engaged the issue of sexuality. Despite the program’s self-described feminist orientation, ethnographic analysis revealed its reliance on moralistic, age-based standards of appropriate sexual interest and behavior; the suppression of sexuality; and girl-as-victim discourse. These data bolster the call for reformed, sex-positive approaches to adolescent sexuality and reveal some of the complexities involved in cross-generational feminist interventions.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Lewis, A. E., Stewart, A. S., & Malley, J. E. (in press). Girl talk: The paradox of empowerment in a feminist mentorship program. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.
2.
Boisnier, A. D. (2003). Race and women’s identity development: Distinguishing between feminism and womanism among Black and White women. Sex Roles, 49, 211-218.
3.
Brown, L. M. (1998). Raising their voices: The politics of girls’ anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109-126). Boston: Little, Brown.
6.
Chenitz, C. W., & Swanson, J. (1986). From practice to grounded theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Debold, E., Brown, L. M., Weseen, S., & Brookins, G. K. (1999). Cultivating relational hardiness zones for adolescent girls: A reconceptualization of resilience in relationships with caring adults. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 181-204). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA).
8.
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 157-197.
9.
Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29-53.
10.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (1999). Feminist methodology and young people’s sexuality. In R. Parker & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, society and sexuality: A reader (pp. 457-472). London: University College London Press.
13.
Hudson, B. (1984). Femininity and adolescence. In A. McRobbie & M. Nava (Eds.), Gender and generation (pp. 31-53). London: Macmillan.
14.
Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of White women and women of Color. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 833-855.
15.
Kaplan, E. B. (1997). Not our kind of girl: Unraveling the myths of Black teenage motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Kaplan, E. B., & Cole, L. (2003). “I want to read stuff on boys”: White, Latina, and Black girls reading Seventeenmagazine and encountering adolescence. Adolescence, 38, 149-159.
17.
Lesko, N. (1996). Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representations. Youth and Society, 28, 139-161.
18.
Macpherson, P., & Fine, M. (1995). Hungry for an us: Adolescent girls and adult women negotiating territories of race, gender, class and differences. Feminism and Psychology, 5, 181-200.
19.
Morokoff, P. J. (2000). A cultural context for sexual assertiveness in women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 299-319). Washington, DC: APA.
20.
Phillips, L. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: New York University Press.
21.
Pipher, M. (1996). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine.
22.
Reid, P. T., & Bing, V. M. (2000). Sexual roles of girls and women: An ethnocultural lifespan perspective. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 141-166). Washington, DC: APA.
23.
Rhodes, J. E. (2002). Stand by me: The risks and rewards of mentoring today’s youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Sullivan, A. M. (1996). From mentor to muse: Recasting the role of women in relationship with urban adolescent girls. In B. J. R. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 226-249). New York: New York University Press.
26.
Tolman, D. L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender and Society, 8, 324-342.
27.
Tolman, D. L. (1996). Adolescent girls’ sexuality: Debunking the myth of the urban girl. In B. J. R. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp. 255-271). New York: New York University Press.
28.
Tolman, D. L. (1999). Female adolescent sexuality in relational context: Beyond sexual decision making. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond appearance: A new look at adolescent girls (pp. 227-246). Washington, DC: APA.
29.
Way, N. (1995). “Can’t you see the courage, the strength that I have?”: Listening to urban adolescent girls speak about their relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 107-128.
30.
Whatley, M. H. (1994). Keeping adolescents in the picture: Construction of adolescent sexuality in textbook images and popular films. In J. M. Irvine (Ed.), Sexual cultures and the construction of adolescent identities (pp. 183-205). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
