Key Dimensions of Women's Ready-to-Wear Apparel: Developing a Consumer Size-Labeling System

Abstract

Key dimensions were selected for women's ready-to-wear garments to generate an anthropometric size-labeling system designating garment size with body measurements. Two different statistical analyses were used to select key dimensions: residual variance analysis and factor analysis. The results of the study show that (a) the key dimensions selected by both means of analysis are similar, (b) the key dimensions used in most mail-order catalogs are appropriate, and (c) in addition to the key dimensions currently in use, another key dimension representing length or height is needed. Bust circumference was selected as a key dimension for all upper body garments. Hip and waist circumferences were selected for all lower body garments. The key dimensions representing length or height were sleeve inseam length or sleeve outseam length for long-sleeve shirts, shoulder height or shoulder length for short-sleeve or sleeveless shirts, crotch height for calf- or ankle-length pants, and waist height for skirts.

Keywords

key dimensions size-labeling system women's apparel body measurements

References

Aerospace Medical Research Lab (1977). Anthropometry of women of the U.S. Army (No. AD A086 302). Spring Field, VA: National Technical Information Service .

British Standard Institution (1982). Specification for size designation of women's wear: BS 3666 (Report No. UDC 687. 12-181:006.78). London: British Standard Institution.

Brown, P. (1992). Ready-to-wear apparel analysis. New York: Macmillan.

Delk, A.E. , & Cassill, N.L. (1989). Jeans sizing: Problems and recommendations. Apparel manufacturer, 1(2), 18-23.

Gordon, C.C. (1986). Anthropometric sizing and fit testing of a single battle-dress uniform for U.S. Army men and women. In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing (ASTM STP 900) (pp. 591-592). Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials .

Green, M.E. (1981). An application of U.S. Army women's anthropometric data to the derivation of hypothetical sizing/tariffing systems. Clothing Research Journal, 9(1), 16-32.

Haslegrave, C.M. (1986). Characterizing the anthropometric extremes of the population. Ergonomics, 29(2), 281-301.

Horridge, P.E. , & Woodson, E.M. (1988). Apparel sizing solutions for an ageing problem . Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 12, 277-288.

Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (1990 ). Japanese industrial standard general rule of sizing systems and designation for clothes (JIS L 0103-1990). Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association.

10.

Jasper, C.R. , & Ouellette, S. (1994). Consumers' perceptions of risk and the purchase of apparel from catalogs. Journal of Direct Marketing, 8(2), 23-36.

11.

Kemsley, K. (1957). Women's measurements and sizes—A study sponsored by the joint clothing council limited. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.

12.

Korean Standard Association (1990). Sizing systems for women's and girls' garments (KS K 0051-1990). Seoul: Korean Standard Association.

13.

LaBat, K.L. (1987). Consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the fit of ready-to-wear clothing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

14.

Laubach, L.L. , McConville, J.T. , Churchill, E. , & White, R.M. (1977). Anthropometry of women of the U.S. Army, 1977, Report No. 1-Methodology and survey plan (Report No. NATICK/TR-77/021). Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research and Development Command.

15.

Mail-order companies (1987, October). Consumer Reports, pp. 607-614.

16.

McConville, J.T. , Tebbetts, I. , & Churchill, T. (1979). Analysis of body size measurements for U.S. Navy women's clothing and pattern design: Final report (Report No. NATICK/TR-138) . Natick, MA: Navy Clothing and Textile Research Facility.

17.

O'Brien, R. , & Sheldon, W.C. (1941). Women's measurements for garment and pattern construction (Miscellaneous publication No. 454). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

18.

The Office of Hungarian Standards (1986), Hungarian People's Republic-State Standard (MSZ 6100/I-86). Budapest, Hungary.

19.

Pironti, A.R. , Vitriol, M.M. , & Thurm, A. (1981). Consumer interest in mail-order purchasing. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(3), 35-38.

20.

Quigley, B.Z. , & De Silva, L. (1990). The mail order catalog industry in Britain. Journal of Direct Marketing, 4(3), 53-60.

21.

Robinette, K.M. (1986). Anthropometric methods for improving protection . In R. L. Barker & G. C. Coletta (Eds.), Performance of protective clothing (ASTP STP 900) (pp. 569-580). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.

22.

The sale is in the mail. (1984). Chain Store Age Executive, 60(3): 44-54.

23.

Salusso-Deonier, C.J. (1982). A method for classifying adult female body form variations in relation to the U.S. standard for apparel sizing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.

24.

Seitz, V. (1987). Clothing interest as an indicator of catalog use . Home Economics Research Journal, 16(2), 120-126.

25.

Smallwood, V. , & Wiener, J. (1987). Light and heavy catalog shoppers of clothing. Clothing and Textile Research Journal, 5(3), 25-30.

26.

White, R. (1976). The anthropometry of the United States: Men and women. Human Factors, 21(4), 473-482.