Enhancing Sustainable Development by Triple Value Adding to the Core Business of Government

Abstract

Much of the debate on sustainable development is focused on improvements to production and development practices. However, government decision-making processes can have a significant influence over sustainable development outcomes. Many decision-making processes used to resolve sustainable development issues result in compromised or lowest-common-denominator outcomes. This article argues the need for a more diversified approach to sustainable development by using decision-making processes involving government projects and programs to add value to economic, social, and natural capital. The article introduces the concept of triple value adding to the core business activities of government. Triple value adding involves applying new approaches to improve the planning, designing, and packaging of public projects and service programs to increase their economic, environmental, and social capital multiplier effects and thereby achieve more sustainable development outcomes. This article suggests some practical measures to embed sustainability into the core business of public agencies.

References

Australian Bankers’ Association . (2001, September 3). Background on review of code of banking practice (Media release). Sydney: Author.

Banks bow to angry customers: A call for a social charter . (2001, March 27). The Australian, Business Section, p. 1.

Brown, R. , Robinson, J. , Gannon, J. , & Jensen, R. (1994, February). Pre-feasibility study of the Gateway Ports industrial development project. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Premiers Department, Office of the Coordinator General.

Cohen, S. , & Fields, G. (1999, Winter). Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 41(2), 108-130.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Oxford: Capstone.

Fabrizio, B. (1998). Interim report of the Department for Development and Cohesion Policies, Italian government. Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, 3, 465-486.

Galster, G. (1998). An econometric model of the metropolitan opportunity structure: Cumulative causation among city markets, social problems and underserved areas. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation and Urban Institute.

Global Reporting Initiative . (2000). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Available from http://www.globalreporting.org

Grootaert, C. (1997). Social capital: The missing link? In I. Sherageldin (Ed.), Expanding the measure of wealth: Indicators of environmentally sustainable development (pp. 77-93). Washington, DC: World Bank.

10.

Hawken, P. , Lovins, A. , & Lovins, L. (1999). Natural capitalism: The next industrial revolution. London: Earthscan.

11.

Helliwell, J. , & Putman, R. (2000). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 253-268). Washington, DC: World Bank.

12.

Kolk, A. (2000). Green reporting. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 15-16.

13.

Krugman, P. (1995). Development geography and economic theory. Boston: MIT Press.

14.

Lloyd-Jones, A. (1996). Curitiba: Sustainability by design. Urban Design Quarterly, 57, 47-53.

15.

Martin, J. , Petty, J. , & Petty, W. (2000). Value based management: The corporate response to the shareholder revolution (Financial Management Association Survey and Synthesis Series No. 1). Princetown, MA: Harvard Business School.

16.

Martin, R. , & Sunley, P. (1996). Geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: A critical assessment. Economic Geography, 72(3), 259-292.

17.

Mohapatra, B. (1998). State-society synergy: Government and social capital in development. Contemporary Sociology, 27(3), 292-293.

18.

Munasinghe, M. (1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development (World Bank Environment paper No. 3). Washington, DC: World Bank.

19.

Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. London: Duckworth.

20.

Nelson, J. (1998). Building competitiveness and communities: How world-class companies are creating shareholder value and social value. London: Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum.

21.

Newson, M. (1999). Environmental disclosure: Singing from the same hymn. Available from http://icaa.org.au/ICAA/triple/CentreSet.htm

22.

Nijkamp, P. , Rietveld, P. , & Voogd, P. (1990). Multi-criteria evaluation in physical planning. Amsterdam: North Holland.

23.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.

24.

Shell Oil Company . (1999). The Shell Report 1999. Available from www.shell.com/shellreport

25.

Skott, P. , & Auerbach, P. (1995). Cumulative causation and the “new” theories of economic growth. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(3), 381-402.

26.

Steinfels, P. (1999, January 30). A social ethicist carries the language of economics into the world of religion, and, though history’s tide opposes him, finds benefits for both. New York Times, p.7.