Organizational discourse has very little meaning outside its context. To understand any discourse's meaning, we must theorize about both the discourse's possibility and the circumstances of its constitution. Otherwise, we abstract text, sundering it from context. The present article asks what is context and what types of discourse structures and discourse strategies construct context? The author develops four distinct dimensions of context: when, where, as whom, and why people speak. To collaboratively construct meaning, an organization's members use several discursive means whereby a discourse from one context can be inserted, reframed, appropriated, and recursively placed into a discourse from another context—to achieve cross-contextual organizing of their accounts. Through such cross-contextual discursive work, members strive to balance these four (sometimes conflicting) contextual dimensions.
Alby, F., & Zucchermaglio, C. (2006). Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let's fix it: How situated practices shape group decision making. Organization Studies, 27(7), 943-964.
2.
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Organization Studies, 53(9), 1125-1149.
3.
Archer M.S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology,33, 455-483.
4.
Auer, P. (1992). Introduction: John Gumperz' approach to contextualization . In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 1-38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
5.
Ballard, D.I., & Seibold, D.R. (2003). Communicating and organizing in time: A meso-level model of organizational temporality. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 380-415.
6.
Ballard, D.I., & Seibold, D.R. (2004). Communication-related organizational structures and work group temporal experiences: The effects of coordination method, technology type, and feedback cycle on members' construals and enactments of time. Communication Monographs, 71(1), 1-27.
7.
Bamberg M., & Marchman V. (1991). Integration and progression: Towards the linguistic construction of narrative discourse. Discourse Processes,14, 277-305.
8.
Bar-Gill, O., & Ben-Shahar, O. (2005). Credible coercion. Texas Law Review, 83(3), 717-781.
9.
Barker, J.R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Barley, S.R., & Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies , 18(1), 93-117.
11.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
12.
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Boje, D.M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamaraland.” Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 997-1035.
14.
Boje, D.M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J.D. (2005). Language and organization: The doing of discourse . Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 571-577.
15.
Borum, F. (2004). Means-end frames and the politics and myths of organizational fields. Organization Studies, 25(6), 897-914.
16.
Broadfoot, K., Deetz, S., & Anderson, D. (2004). Multi-levelled, multi-method approaches in organizational discourse. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 193-211). London: Sage.
17.
Brown, A.D. (2004). Authoritative sensemaking in a public inquiry report. Organization Studies, 25(1), 95-119.
18.
Brunsson, N. (1989). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions, and actions in organizations. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
19.
Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
20.
Chreim, S. (2006). Managerial frames and institutional discourses of change: Employee appropriation and resistance. Organization Studies, 27(9), 1261-1285.
21.
Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London : Sage.
22.
Collinson, D. (1994). Strategies of resistance: Power, knowledge, and subjectivity in the workplace. In J. M. Jermier , D. Knights, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and power in organizations (pp. 25-68). London: Routledge .
23.
Cooren, F. (2000). The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
24.
Cooren, F., & Taylor, J.R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7, 219-260.
25.
Cruver, B. (2003). Enron: Anatomy of greed. The unshredded truth from an Enron insider. London: Arrow.
26.
Davenport, S., & Leitch, S. (2005). Circuits of power in practice: Strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1603-1624.
27.
Davies, B., & Harre, R. (1991). Positioning: The discursive production of selves . Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63.
28.
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
Deetz, S. (2003). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
30.
Donnellon, A., Gray, B., & Bougon, M.G. (1986). Communication, meaning, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly,31, 43-55.
31.
Douglas, M. (Ed.) (1973). Rules and meanings: The anthropology of everyday knowledge. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
32.
Drake, B.H., & Moberg, D.J. (1986). Communicating influence attempts in dyads: Linguistic sedatives and palliatives. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 567-584.
33.
Edelman, M. (1966). The symbolic uses of politics. New York: Harper & Row.
34.
Eisenberg, E.M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication . Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
35.
Eisenberg, E.M., & Witten, M.G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication . Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 418-426.
36.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1024.
37.
Enron bosses closer to prison. (2006, May 26). Houston Chronicle. Available from http://chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/enron/3898754.html
38.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Language and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
39.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5-26.
40.
Finstad, N. (1998). The rhetoric of organizational change. Human Relations, 51(6), 717- 741.
41.
Fisher, W. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
42.
Ford, J.D., & Ford, L.W. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 541-570.
43.
Forray, J.M., & Woodilla, J. (2002). Temporal spans in talk: doing consistency to construct fair organization. Organization Studies, 23(6), 899-927.
44.
Fox, L. ( 2003). Enron: The rise and fall. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
45.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction . New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
47.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
48.
Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004). Introduction: Organizational discourse. Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1-36). London: Sage.
49.
Greimas, A.J. (1987). On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
50.
Hardy, C. (2001). Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 25-47.
51.
Hardy, C., Palmer, I., & Phillips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53(9), 1227-1248.
52.
Hatch, M.J. (1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team. Organization Science, 8(3), 275-288.
53.
Heracleous, L. (2002, August). Text and context: Toward a longitudinal-contextual discourse analysis approach. Paper presented at Academy of Management meeting, Washington, DC.
54.
Heracleous, L. (2004). Interpretivist approaches to organizational discourse . In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 175-192). London: Sage.
55.
Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley : University of California Press.
56.
Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
57.
Ice, R. ( 1991). Corporate publics and rhetorical strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 341-362.
58.
Iedema, R. (2003). Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
59.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.
60.
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly,35, 340-360.
61.
Kuhn, T., & Ashcraft, K.L. (2003). Corporate scandal and the theory of the firm: Formulating the contributions of organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 20-57.
62.
Lawrence, T.B., Winn, M.I., & Jennings, P.D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624-644.
63.
Leidner, R. (1993). Fast food, fast talk. Berkeley : University of California Press.
64.
Linstead, S. (2001). Rhetoric and organizational control: A framework for analysis. In R. Westwood & S. Linstead (Eds.), The language of organization (pp. 217-240). London: Sage.
65.
MacFarland, D.A. (2004), Resistance as social drama: A study of change-oriented encounters. American Journal of Sociology, 109(6), 1249-1319.
66.
March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
67.
McPhee, R.D. (2004). Text, agency, and organization in the light of structuration theory. Organization, 11(3), 355-371.
68.
McPhee, R.D., Corman, S.R., & Dooley, K. (2002). Organizational knowledge expression and management: Centering resonance analysis of organizational discourse. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 274-281.
69.
McPhee, R.D., & Zaug, P. (2000, February). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association convention, Sacramento, CA.
70.
McPhee, R.D., & Zaug, P. (2001). Organizational theory, organizational communication, organizational knowledge, and problematic integration. Working paper, Arizona State University, Hugh Downs School of Human Communication.
71.
Mills, C.W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motives. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
72.
Neilsen, E.H., & Rao, M.V.H. (1987). The strategy-legitimacy nexus: A thick description . Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 523-533.
73.
Olsen, J.P. (1976). Choice in an organized anarchy. In J. March & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations (pp. 82-139). Bergen , Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
74.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, M.L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
75.
Pettigrew, A., Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change: Making change in large organizations. The case of the National Health Service. London: Sage.
76.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
77.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78.
Ray, C.A. (1986). Corporate culture: The last frontier of control . Journal of Management Studies, 23, 287-297.
79.
Reed, M. (1998). Organizational analysis as discourse analysis: A critique. In D. Grant, T. Keenoy, & C. Oswick (Eds.), Discourse + organization (pp. 214-222). London: Sage.
80.
Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J.R. (2004). The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Academy of Management Review , 29(4), 617-635.
81.
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1974). Opening up closings. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 233-264). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
82.
Schneider, S.C., & Dunbar, R.L.M. (1992). A psychoanalytic reading of hostile takeover events. Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 537-567.
83.
Scott, C.R., Corman, S.R., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 8(3), 298-336.
84.
Sewell, G.H., Jr. (1992). The theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29.
85.
Sillince, J.A.A. (1999a). The organizational setting, use, and institutionalization of argumentation repertoires. Journal of Management Studies , 36(6), 795-831.
86.
Sillince, J.A.A. (1999b). The role of political language forms and language coherence in the organizational change process. Organization Studies, 20(3), 485-518.
87.
Sillince, J.A.A. (2000). Rhetorical power, accountability, and conflict in committees: An argumentation approach. Journal of Management Studies, 37(8), 1101-1124.
88.
Sillince, J.A.A. (2002). A model of the strength and appropriateness of argumentation and rhetoric in organizational contexts. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 585-618.
89.
Sillince, J.A.A. (2005). A contingency theory of rhetorical congruence . Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 608-621.
90.
Taylor, J.R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organization communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
91.
Taylor, J.R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6, 1-39.
92.
Taylor, J.R., & Van Every, E.J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
93.
Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (2003). Subterranean worksick blues: Humour as subversion in two call centres. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1487-1511.
94.
Terry, L. (1987, Spring). The conference as an administrative strategy for building organizational commitment: The CWA experience. Labour Studies Journal,26, 48-61.
95.
Torry, W.I. (2001). Social change, crime, and culture: The defense of provocation. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 36(3), 309-335.
96.
Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Vaara, E. (2002). On the discursive construction of success/failure in narratives of post merger integration. Organization Studies , 23(2), 211-249.
97.
Weick, K.E., (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly,38, 628-652.
98.
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.
