Some scholars have argued that to improve K-12 education, we should eliminate public schools and let private schools compete for students. Missing from such proposals is analysis of K-12 schooling to determine its propensity for competition. In this article, the author develops a working definition of the K-12 education industry, presents characteristics of other industries that industrial organization economists have determined undermine the operation of a competitive marketplace, and considers whether these characteristics apply to K-12 schooling. Some conditions—ease of entry into the market, product differentiation, and availability of resources—support competition. However, large economies of scale in a local market and relative price inelasticity of demand imply monopolies and trusts. Also, inadequate information and probable external costs suggest considerable regulation would be needed. The author tentatively concludes that the industry will not be competitive but emphasizes the potential of industrial organization analysis rather than the author’s conclusion.
References
1.
Archbald, D. A.
(2000). School choice and school stratification: Shortcomings of the stratification critique and recommendations for theory and research. Educational Policy, 14(2), 214-240.
2.
Bamberger, G. E.
, & Carlton, D. W. (1999). Antitrust and higher education. In J. E. Kwoka & L. J. White (Eds.), The antitrust revolution: Economics, competition, and policy (3rd ed., pp. 264-285). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Barker, R. G.
, & Gump, P. V. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Carnoy, M.
(2000). School choice? Or is it privatization?Educational Researcher, 29(7), 15-20.
5.
Chiswick, B. R.
, & Koutroumanes, S. (1996). An econometric analysis of the demand for private schooling. In S. W. Polachek (Ed.), Research in labor economics (Vol. 15, pp. 209-238). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Chubb, J. E.
, & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets and American schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
7.
Datnow, A.
(2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 357-374.
8.
Freeman, S.
(1999). To market, to market: Privatizing public education. Educational Policy, 13(3), 440-454.
9.
Friedman, M.
(1955). The role of government in education. In R. A. Solo (Ed.) Economics and the public interest (pp. 123-144). NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
Gintis, H.
(1995). The political economy of school choice. Teachers College Record, 96(3), 1-20.
11.
Gorard, S.
, & Fitz, J. (2000). Markets and stratification: A viewfrom England and Wales. Educational Policy, 14(3), 405-428.
12.
Greene, J.
, Peterson, P. E., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. In P. E. Peterson & B. C. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (chap. 13). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Hoxby, C. M.
(1999). The productivity of schools and other local public goods producers. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 1-30.
14.
Hoxby, C. M.
(2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers?American Economic Review, 90(5), 1209-1238.
15.
Ingersoll, R. M.
(1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
16.
James, E.
(1986) Public subsidies for private and public education: The Dutch case. In D. C. Levy (Ed.), Private education: Studies in choice and public policy (chap. 4). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Kemerer, F. R.
(2000). Occasional paper no. 6: Legal issues involving educational privatization and accountability. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, the National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
18.
Lee, V. E.
, & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-227.
19.
Levin, H. M.
(1987). Education as a public and private good. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(4), 628-641.
20.
Levin, H. M.
(1998). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(3), 373-392.
21.
Lieberman, M.
(1989). Privatization and educational choice. New York: St. Martin’s.
22.
López-de-Silanes, F.
(1997). Determinants of privatization prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 965-1025.
23.
McEwan, P. J.
, & Carnoy, M. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile’s voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 213-239.
24.
Meyers, D.
, Peterson, P., Mayer, D., Chou, J., & Howell, W. G. (2000). School choice in New York City after two years: An evaluation of the school choice scholarships program: Interim report (8404-036). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
25.
Murnane, R. J.
(1986). Family choice in public education: The roles of students, teachers, and system designers. Teachers College Record, 88(2), 169-189.
26.
Murphy, J.
, Gilmer, S. W., Weise, R., & Page, A. (1998). Pathways to privatization in education. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
27.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
. (1996). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28.
Neal, D.
(1998). What have we learned about the benefits of private schooling?Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4(1), 79-86.
29.
Nechyba, T.
(2000). Mobility, targeting, and private-school vouchers. American Economics Review, 90(1), 130-146.
30.
Odden, A.
, & Busch, C. (1998). Financing schools for high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Organization for Cooperation and Economic Development (OECD)
. (1994). School: A matter of choice. Paris: Author.
32.
Riew, J.
(1986). Scale economies, capacity utilization and school cost: A comparative analysis of secondary and elementary schools. Journal of Education Finance, 11, 433-440.
33.
Rouse, C. E.
(1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 543-602.
34.
Savas, E. S.
(2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
35.
Shepard, W. G.
(1997). The economics of industrial organization (4th ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
36.
Stern, D.
, Finkelstein, N., Stone, J., Latting, J., & Dornsife, C. (1995). School-to-work: Research on programs in the United States. Washington, DC: Falmer.
37.
Stiefel, L.
, Berne, R., Iatarola, P., & Fruchter, N. (2000). High school size: Effects on budgets and performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 27-39.
38.
Stull, J. C.
, & Stull, W. J. (1998). Interdistrict school choice in a metropolitan setting: Characteristics and consequences. In A.H. Raphaelson (Ed.), Restructuring state and local services (chap. 3). Westport, CT: Praeger.
39.
Waldman, D. E.
, & Jensen, E. J. (1998). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
Whitty, G.
(1997). Creating quasi-markets in education: A reviewof recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 22, chap. 1). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
41.
Winston, G. C.
(1999). Subsidies, hierarchy, and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13-36.
42.
Witte, J. F.
(1999). The Milwaukee voucher experiment: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(1), 59-64.
43.
Woods, P. A.
, Bagley, C., & Glatter, R. (1998). School choice and competition: Markets in the public interest?New York: Routledge.
44.
Wyatt, E.
(2001, January 1). Challenges and the possibility of profits for Edison schools. New York Times. Retrieved from http://archives.nytimes.com/archives
