Exploring the Relationship Between Prior Career Experience and Instructional Quality Among Mathematics and Science Teachers in Alternative Teacher Certification Programs
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2010
Exploring the Relationship Between Prior Career Experience and Instructional Quality Among Mathematics and Science Teachers in Alternative Teacher Certification Programs
This mixed-method evaluation study examines relationships between the nature and characteristics of teachers’ prior experiences and teachers’ practice of standards-based instruction as a measure of instructional quality among alternatively certified mathematics and science teachers. The study found that career length, number of prior careers, and career relevance to subject area were not related to instructional quality. However, teachers with prior career experiences that were education-related practiced standards-based instruction to a greater degree than teachers with no education-relevant career experience. Implications of these findings for policy makers and practitioners are discussed.
Adams, G.J., & Dial, M. ( 1993). Teacher survival: A Cox regression model. Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 90-99.
2.
Borman, G.D., & Kimball, S.M. ( 2005). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps ? The Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 3-20.
3.
Chi, M.T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. ( 1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. C. (Eds.). (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
5.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. ( 2002). Defining "highly qualified teachers": What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13-25.
6.
Della-Piana, G.M. ( 1999). Toward a context-based and dilemma-based model of program implementation theory to guide program evaluation. Mechanisms: Newsletter for the Program Theory & Theory-Driven Evaluation Topical Interest Group, 3, 12-21.
7.
Eraut, M. ( 1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence . Washington, DC: Falmer Press .
8.
Gray, B.P. ( 1987). Let scientists teach in the science classroom . Curriculum Review, March/ April, 32-33.
9.
Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R.D. ( 1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement . Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396.
10.
Haberman, M. ( 1990). The rationale for training adults as teachers . In C. Sleeter (Ed.), Empowerment through multicultural education (pp. 275-286). Buffalo: State University of New York.
11.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., & McDonald, M., et al. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12.
Heinen, E.B. & Scribner, J.P. ( 2007). Bureaucratic discretion and alternative teacher certification: Understanding program variation in Missouri. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 15(13). Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v15n13/
13.
Horizon Research. (2001). Core evaluation manual: Professional development observation guidelines. Retrieved February 1, 2002, from http://www.horizon-research.com/LSC/manual/0102/existing/php
14.
Humphrey, D.C., & Wechsler, M.E. (2007). Insights into alternative certification: Initial findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 483-530.
15.
Kirby, S.N., Darling-Hammond, L., & Hudson, L. ( 1989). Nontraditional recruits to mathematics and science teaching . Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 301-323.
16.
National Center for Education Information. ( 2007). Alternative routes to teacher certification: An overview . Retrieved April 2, 2007, from http://www.ncei.com
17.
National Commission for Excellence in Teacher Education. ( 1985). A call for change in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
18.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
19.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Newman, C., & Thomas, K. ( 1999). Alternative teacher certification. Arlington, VA: American Association of Educational Service Agencies.
21.
Rice, J.K. ( 2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
22.
Scribner, J.P. & Heinen, E. (in press). Alternative teacher certification: A program theory analysis . Teacher Education Quarterly.
23.
Shen, J. ( 1999). Alternative certification: Math and science teachers . Educational Horizons, 78(1), 44-48.
24.
Smith, T.M., Desimone, L.M., & Ueno, K. ( 2005). "Highly qualified" to do what? The relationship between NCLB teacher quality mandates and the use of reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 75-109.
25.
Stevens, C.J., & Dial, M. ( 1993). A qualitative study of alternatively certified teachers . Education and Urban Society, 26(1), 63-77.
26.
Stoddart, T., & Floden, R.E. ( 1995). Traditional and alternative routes to teacher certification: Issues, assumptions, and misconceptions. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning .
27.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
29.
Wayne, A.J., & Youngs, P. ( 2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
30.
Wenger, E. ( 1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity . New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
32.
Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 190-204.
33.
Wise, A.E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1991). Alternate certification is an oxymoron. Education Week, pp. 46-56.
34.
Zumwalt, K., & Craig, E. ( 2006). Teachers’ characteristics: Research on the indicators of quality. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 157-260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
