This article reports qualitative data on how the Swedish Public Employment Service classifies unemployed individuals as ‘occupationally disabled’ in order to transfer them to various labour market programmes.The article draws on a framework of medicalization, arguing that the individualization of the social issue of unemployment into a personal trouble of disability is a neglected yet important phenomenon that has interesting implications for theory and policy. By classifying some people as disabled in order to explain their unemployment, medicalization can be seen as an important yet so far neglected mechanism in understanding how this individualizing enterprise comes about. It is concluded that by medicalizing unemployment, the target for society’s intervention to fight the spectre of unemployment is primarily individuals’ personal troubles rather than any social issues.
Abberley, P. ( 2002) ‘Work, Disability, Disabled People and European Social Theory’, in C. Barnes et al. (eds), Disability Studies Today, pp. 120-38. Cambridge: Polity.
2.
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. ( 2002) ‘Hidden Unemployment among Men: A Case Study’ , Regional Studies36(8): 811-23.
3.
Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. ( 2005) The Diversion from ‘Unemployment’ to ‘Sickness’ across British Regions and Districts’, Regional Studies39(8): 837-54.
4.
Ballard, K. and Elston, M.A. ( 2005) ‘Medicalization: A Multi-Dimensional Concept’ , Social Theory and Health3(3): 228-41.
5.
Branson, J. and Miller, D. ( 2002) Damned for Their Difference: The Cultural Construction of Deaf People as Disabled, a Sociological History. Washington, DC: Gallaudet.
6.
Bull, M. ( 1990) ‘Secularization and Medicalization’ , British Journal of Sociology41(2): 245-61.
7.
Conrad, P. ( 2007) The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. Baltimore , MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
Conrad, P. and Schneider, J.W. ( 1992) Deviance and Medicalization. Philadelphia , PA: Temple University Press.
9.
Considine, M. ( 2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare-to-Work . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Corker, M. and Shakespeare, T. ( 2002) Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory . London: Continuum.
11.
Crawford, R. ( 2006) ‘Health as Meaningful Practice’, Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine10(4): 401-20.
12.
De Mooij, R.A. ( 1999) ‘Disability Benefits and Hidden Unemployment in the Netherlands’, Journal of Policy Modeling21(6): 695-713.
13.
Elm Larsen, J. ( 2005) ‘The Active Society and Activation Policy: Ideologies, Contexts and Effects’, in J. Goul Andersen et al. (eds), The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizen Perspective, pp. 135-50. Bristol : The Policy Press.
14.
Fieldhouse, E. and Hollywood, E. ( 1999) ‘Life after Mining: Hidden Unemployment and Changing Patterns of Economic Activity Amongst Miners in England and Wales 1981-91’ , , Work, Employment and Society13(3): 483-502.
15.
Fothergill, S. ( 2001) ‘The True Scale of the Regional Problem in the UK’ , Regional Studies35(3): 241-6.
16.
Ford, F.M., Ford, J. and Dowrick, C. ( 2000) ‘Welfare to Work: The Role of General Practice’ , British Journal of General Practice50(455): 497-500.
17.
Fujiura, G.T. and Rutkowski-Kmitta, V. ( 2001) ‘Counting Disability’, in G. Albrecht et al. (eds), Handbook of Disability Studies, pp. 69-96. New York, NY: Paul Chapman.
18.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. ( 1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine: Transaction Books .
19.
Goul Andersen, J.,Guillemard, A.-M.,Jensen, P.H. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (eds) (2005) The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizen Perspective . Bristol: The Policy Press.
20.
Lane, H. ( 1997) ‘Construction of Deafness’, in L.J. Davis (ed.), The Disability Studies Reader, pp. 153-71. London: Routledge .
21.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. ( 1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. London : SAGE.
22.
Lindert, P.H. ( 2004) Growing Public. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lindsay, C., McQuaid, R.W. and Dutton, M. ( 2007) ‘New Approaches to Employability in the UK: Combining "Human Capital Development" and "Work First Strategies"?’ , Social Policy36(4): 539-60.
24.
Loe, M. ( 2004) The Rise of Viagra. New York, NY: New York University Press.
25.
Lupton, D. ( 1997) ‘Foucault and the Medicalization Critique’ , in A. Petersen and R. Bunton (eds), Foucault: Health and Medicine , pp. 94-110. London: Routledge.
26.
Mathieu, A. ( 1993) ‘The Medicalization of Homelessness and the Theater of Repression’, Medical Anthropological Quarterly7(2): 170-84.
27.
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. ( 1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd Edition. London: SAGE.
28.
Mills, C.W. ( 2000) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
29.
Mishler, E.G. ( 1992) ‘Critical Perspectives on the Biomedical Model’ , in P. Brown (ed.), Perspectives in Medical Sociology, pp. 153-66. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
30.
Mohr, J.W. ( 1994) ‘Soldiers, Mothers, Tramps and Others: Discourse Roles in the 1907 New York City Charity Directory’, Poetics22: 327-57.
31.
Mythen, G. ( 2005) ‘Employment, Individualization and Insecurity: Rethinking the Risk Society Perspective’, The Sociological Review53(1): 129-49.
32.
Ostner, I. ( 2003) ‘"Individualization": The Origins of the Concept and Its Impact on German Social Policies’, Social Policy and Society3(1): 47-56.
33.
Overbye, E. ( 2005) ‘Dilemmas in Disability Activation and How Scandinavians Try to Live with Them’, in P. Saunders (ed.), Welfare to Work in Practice: Social Security and Participation in Economic and Social Life, pp. 155-72. Aldershot : Ashgate.
34.
Patti R.J. (ed.) (2000) The Handbook of Social Welfare Management. London: SAGE.
35.
Pearsall, J. (ed.) (1999) The Concise Oxford Dictionary, 10th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Prottas, J.M. ( 1978) ‘The Power of the Street-Level Bureaucrat in Public Service Bureaucracies’, Urban Affairs Quarterly13(3): 285-312.
37.
Schram, S.F. ( 2000) ‘In the Clinic: The Medicalization of Welfare’ , Social Text18: 81-107.
38.
Serrano Pascual, A. ( 2007), ‘Reshaping Welfare States: Activation Regimes in Europe’, in A. Serrano Pascual and L. Magnusson (eds), Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe, pp. 11-34. Brussels: Peter Lang.
39.
Slavin, S. (ed.) (1985) Social Administration: The Management of Social Services. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
Stone, D.A. ( 1985) The Disabled State. Basingstoke : Macmillan.
46.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. ( 1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition. London: SAGE.
47.
Thomas, C. ( 2002). ‘Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers’ , in C. Barnes et al. (eds), Disability Studies Today, pp. 38-57. Cambridge : Polity.
48.
Wadensjö, E. ( 2007) ‘Activation Policy in Sweden’, in A. Serrano Pascual and L. Magnusson (eds), Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe, pp. 127-44. Brussels: Peter Lang.
