Due to the fact that the complexity of loads and uncertainties of random variables affect the reliability of defective casings, with consideration to the disadvantages of the deterministic approach, in this paper a probabilistic assessment method is employed based on previously established safety evaluation criteria for casings with corrosion defects in thermal recovery wells. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation is proposed to analyze the casing reliability under different remaining strengths. Sensitivity analysis is then performed to rank the influence of various variables for casing failure, and finally the influence law of the main parameters on the maximum Von Mises stress of defective casing is summarized.
WillhiteGPDietrichWK. Design criteria for completion of steam injection wells. J Petrol Technol1967; 19: 15–21.
2.
MaruyamaKTsuruEOgasawaramM. An experimental study of casing performance under thermal cycling conditions. SPE Drill Eng1990; 5: 156–164.
3.
Maharaj G and Petrotrin. Thermal well casing failure analysis. In: SPE Latin America/Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad, 23–26 April 1996, paper no. 36143, pp.651–655. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
4.
TalebiSNechtscheinSBooneTJ. Seismicity and casing failures due to steam stimulation in oil sands. Pure Appl Geophys1998; 153: 219–33.
5.
LiZF. Casing cementing with half warm-up for thermal recovery wells. J Petrol Sci Eng2008; 61: 94–98.
6.
LiHQZhaoZXCuiK. Influence of high temperature on casing strength in thermal recovery well. Drill Prod Technol2011; 34: 90–92.
7.
QianFGaoDL. A mechanical model for predicting casing creep load in high temperature wells. J Natl Gas Sci Eng2011; 3: 530–535.
8.
ChengLSLuoYYDingZP. Fuzzy Comprehensive evaluation model for estimating casing damage in heavy oil reservoir. Petrol Sci Technol2013; 31: 1092–1098.
9.
HuangXMihseinMKibbleK. Collapse strength analysis of casing design using finite element method. Int J Pressure Vessels Piping2000; 77: 359–367.
10.
JiYJChengLSLiuJJ. A simulation of casing damage considering THM coupling. Petrol Sci Technol2011; 29: 977–987.
11.
American Petroleum Institute. API Bulletin 5C3-1994. Bulletin on formulas and calculations for casing, tubing, drill pipe and line pipe properties, Dallas: API Production Department, 1994.
12.
China State Bureau of Petroleum Chemical Industries. SY/T 5322-2000 Design method of casing string strength, Beijing: Machinery Industry Press, 2001.
13.
YanXZGaoJWYangXJ. Analysis of API formulas and calculation of casing strength based on reliability theory. Acta Petrolei Sinica2007; 28: 122–126.
14.
Adams AJ, Parfitt SHL, Reeves TB, et al. Casing system risk analysis using structural reliability. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 22–25 February 1993, paper no. 25693, pp.169–178. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
15.
Chantose P, Gardoni P, Schubert J, et al. Structural reliability: Assessing the condition and reliability of casing in compacting reservoirs. In: International petroleum technology conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 7–9 February 2012, pp.1–15.
16.
WangZHMaZZ. Effect by thermal well temperature on casing properties and calculation method for pretension. Steel Pipe2007; 36: 24–27.
17.
ZhuXHLiuSHTongH. Plastic limit analysis of defective casing for thermal recovery wells. Eng Fail Anal2013; 27: 340–349.
18.
GalambosTVRavindraMK. Properties of steel for use in LRFD. J Struct Divn ASCE1978; 104: 1459–1468.
19.
LvZYSongSFLiHS. Structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis, Beijing: Science Press, 2009, pp. 135–135.
20.
ZhangLAdeyRA. Predicting the probability of failure of gas pipelines including inspection and repair procedures.report no. 502661, 9 December 2007. Report for Computational Mechanics International, San Sebastian, report no. 502661, 9 December 2007.
21.
SaltelliAChanKScottEM. Sensitivity analysis, Chichester: John Wiley, 2000.
