Electromagnetic harvesters need to be designed with a mechanism to amplify the coil relative velocity to ensure compact size and lower weight. This paper discusses a novel technique to use fluid link for velocity amplification in an electromagnetic shock absorber. Incorporation of the fluid amplification significantly improves harvested power, without affecting the system dynamics. Numerical modelling and experimentation of a prototype shock absorber comprising of high energy rare earth magnets have been presented. Peak coil voltage of 0.60–24.2 V was recorded during experimentation on the prototype. Experimental and simulation results validate that incorporation of the fluid amplification link improves the harvested electric power by 9702%. Comprehensive design procedure for better harvesting efficiency and vibration isolation has been discussed. Lastly incorporation of the shock absorber in McPherson strut suspension is illustrated. The real size version will be able to harvest peak power of 18–227 W for the suspension velocities of 0.15–0.4 m/s.
Goldner R and Zerigian P. Electromagnetic linear generator and shock absorber. Patent 20030034697, USA, 2005.
2.
DixonJ. The shock absorber handbook, 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 2007.
3.
LiZLeiZLuhrsG. Electromagnetic energy-harvesting shock absorbers: design, modeling, and road tests. IEEE Trans Veh Technol2013; 62: 1065–1074.
4.
Zhang J-Q, Peng Z-Z and Zhang L. Review on energy-regenerative suspension systems for vehicles. In: International Association of Engineers, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, U.K., vol. III, 3–5 July 2013.
5.
Goldner R, Zerigian P and Hull J. Preliminary study of energy recovery in vehicle using regenerative magnetic shock absorber. SAE paper 2001-01-2071, 2001.
6.
Liu C and Lin W. Feasibility investigations of an integrated suspension/generation system for vehicle shock damping applications. In: The 9th international symposium on linear drives for industry application, China, 7–10 July 2013, pp.1–4.
7.
Gupta A, Mulcahy T and Hull J. Electromagnetic shock absorbers. In: IMAC XXI conference and exposition on structural dynamics – smart structures and transducers, Kissimmee, USA, 3–6 February 2011, pp.12–3.
8.
Oprea R, Mihailescu M, Chirila A, et al. Design and efficiency of linear electromagnetic shock absorbers. In: Thirteenth international conference IEEE Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM), Romania, 24–26 May 2012, pp.630–634.
9.
ZuoLScullyBShestaniJ. Design and characterization of an electromagnetic energy harvester for vehicle suspensions. J Smart Mater Struct2010; 19: 1–10.
10.
Zhen L and Wei X. Structure and magnetic field analysis of regenerative electromagnetic shock absorber. In: IEEE-WASE (Workshop on Affective Software Engineering) international conference on information engineering, Hebei, China, 14–15 August 2010, paper no. 11529550, pp.152–155.
11.
Zador I. Rear earth and high temperature superconducting permanent magnet synchronous tube motor/generator optimization for the components of the car suspension system. PhD Thesis, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, 2008.
12.
Ebrahimi B, Khamesee M and Golnaraghi MF. Permanent magnet configuration in design of an eddy current damper. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 18th Annual Conference on Information Storage and Processing Systems, Florida, USA, 16–17 June 2010, pp.19–24.
13.
Paz O. Design and performance of electric shock absorber. Dissertation for Masters of Science in Electrical Engineering, Louisiana State University, 2004.
14.
ZhangYZhangXZhanM. Study on a novel hydraulic pumping regenerative suspension for vehicles. J Franklin Inst2015; 352: 485–499.
15.
FangZGuoXLinX. Experimental study of damping and energy regeneration characteristics of a hydraulic electromagnetic shock absorber. Adv Mech Eng2013; 2013: 1–9.
16.
WangXLiangXWeiH. A study of electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters with different interface circuits. Mech Syst Sig Process2015; 58: 376–398.
17.
HadasZVetiskaVHuzlikR. Model-based design and test of vibration energy harvester for aircraft application. Microsyst Technol2014; 20: 831–843.
18.
Rhimi M and Lajnef N. Tunable energy harvesting from ambient vibrations. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2010 conference on smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems, Philadelphia, USA, January 2010, pp.529–534.
19.
NakanoKCartmellMPHuH. Feasibility of energy harvesting using stochastic resonance caused by axial periodic force. Aust J Mech Eng2014; 60: 314–320.
20.
Alghisi D, Dalola S, Ferrari M, et. al. Triaxial ballimpact piezoelectric converter for autonomous sensors exploiting energy harvesting from vibrations and human motion. Sens Actuat A 2015; 233: 569–581.
21.
Cho TW, Lin CW, Gong RC, et al. Design, development and evaluation of an energy-harvesting electromagnetic shock absorber. In: International Federation for the Promotion of Mechanism and Machine Science Proceedings of the 14th IFToMM World Congress, Taipei, Taiwan, 2015, pp.544–551.
22.
SinghSSatputeNV. Design and analysis of energy harvesting shock absorber with electromagnetic and fluid damping. J Mech Sci Technol2015; 29: 1591–1605.
23.
Pour DS and Behbahani S. Semi-active fuzzy control of machine tool chatter vibration using smart MR dampers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2015; 83: 1–8.
24.
NakanoKSudaYNakadaiS. Self-powered active vibration control using a single electric actuator. J Sound Vib2003; 260: 213–235.
25.
Stribrsky A, Hyniova K, Honcu J, et al. Energy recuperation in automotive active suspension systems with linear electric motor. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 15th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Athens, Greece, 27–29 July 2007, pp.1–5.
26.
Wang R, Fengshou G and Andrew B. Energy recovery system optimisation in automotives. In: Proceedings of The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Computing and Engineering Annual Researchers’ Conference 2012: CEARC’12. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield, pp.161.
27.
Lafarge B, Curea O, Hacala-Perret A, et al. Modeling of an electromechanical energy harvesting system integrated in car dampers. In: ASTech Research and innovation for transport systems of the future, Paris, France, 2012, pp.1–9.
28.
EbrahimiBBolandhemmatHKhameseeMB. A hybrid electromagnetic shock absorber for active vehicle suspension systems. Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49: 311–332.
29.
Montazeri-GhMKavianipourO. Investigation of the passive electromagnetic damper. Acta Mech2012; 223: 2633–2646.
30.
ChoiSSeongMKimK. Vibration control of an electrorheological fluid-based suspension system with an energy regenerative mechanism. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2009; 223: 459–469.
31.
GuptaAJendrzejczykJMulcahyT. Design of electromagnetic shock absorbers. Int J Mech Mater Des2007; 3: 277–284.
32.
Kondo T, Yamagata H and Suda Y. Electromagnetic shock absorber. Patent 7357229 B2, USA, 2008.
33.
AmatiNAndreaFTonoliA. Design of electromagnetic shock absorbers for automotive suspensions. J Veh Syst Dyn2011; 49: 1913–1928.
34.
ZuoLZhangP-S. Energy harvesting, ride comfort and road handling of regenerative vehicle suspensions. J Vib Acoust2013; 135: 1–8.
35.
Satpute NV. Mathematical modeling and experimental investigation of regenerative shock absorber. PhD Thesis, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Punjab, India, 2015.
36.
SatputeNVSinghSSawantSM. Energy harvesting shock absorber with electromagnetic and fluid damping. Adv Mech Eng2014; 2014: 1–14.
37.
CengelYACimbalaJ. Fluid mechanics – fundamentals and applications, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
38.
Boldea I. Variable speed generators. CRC Press. Timisoara, Romania: Taylor and Francis Group, 2006, pp.10–12.
39.
EbrahimiBKhameseeMGolnaraghiF. Eddy current damper feasibility in automobile suspension: modeling, simulation and testing. Smart Mater Struct2009; 18: 1–12.
