A frame-independent comparison metric for discrete motion sequences

Abstract

To evaluate the kinematic performance of designed mechanisms, a statistical-variance-based metric is proposed in this article to measure the “distance” between two discrete motion sequences: the reference motion and the given task motion. It seeks to establish a metric that is independent of the choice of the fixed frame or moving frame. Quaternions are adopted to represent the rotational part of a spatial pose, and the variance of the set of relative displacements is computed to reflect the difference between two sequences. With this variance-based metric formulation, we show that the comparison results of two spatial discrete motions are not affected by the choice of frames. Both theoretical demonstration and computational example are presented to support this conclusion. In addition, since the deviation error between the task motion and the synthesized motion measured with this metric is independent of the location of frames, those corresponding parameters could be excluded from the optimization algorithm formulated with our frame-independent metric in kinematic synthesis of mechanisms, and the complexity of the algorithm are hereby reduced. An application of a four-bar linkage synthesis problem is presented to illustrate the advantage of the proposed metric.

Keywords

Motion comparison metric formulation frame independent mechanism design computational kinematics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bottema

Roth

. Theoretical kinematics, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1979.

McCarthy

. Introduction to theoretical kinematics, Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1990.

Blaschke

. Euklidische kinematik und nichteuklidische geometrie. Zeitschr Math Phys 1911; 60: 61–91.

Hartenberg

Denavit

. Kinematic synthesis of linkages, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1964.

Suh

Radcliffe

. Kinematics and mechanism design, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.

Erdman

Sandor

. Mechanism design: analysis and synthesis, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.

Angeles J and Bai S. Some special cases of the burmester problem for four and five poses. In: Proceedings of 2005 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Long Beach, CA, 24–28 September 2005, paper no. DETC2005-84871.

Husty

Pfurner

Schrocker

H-P

, et al. Algebraic methods in mechanism analysis and synthesis. Robotica 2007; 25: 661–675.

Purwar

, et al. A unified algorithm for analysis and simulation of planar four-bar motions defined with R- and P-joints. J Mech Robot 2015; 7: 011014–011014-7.

10.

Duan

, et al. Dynamic modeling and active control of a cable-suspended parallel robot. Mechatronics 2008; 18: 1–12.

11.

Cao

Zhu

. Dynamic simulation of hybrid-driven planar five-bar parallel mechanism based on simmechanics and tracking control. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2011; 8: 28–33.

12.

Park

. Distance metrics on the rigid body motions with applications to mechanism design. J Mech Des 1995; 117: 48–54.

13.

Angeles

. Is there a characteristic length of a rigid-body displacement. Mech Mach Theory 2006; 41: 884–896.

14.

Venkataramanujam

Larochelle

. A coordinate frame useful for rigid-body displacement metrics. J Mech Robot 2010; 2: 317–337.

15.

Kazerounian K and Rastegar J. Object norms: a class of coordinate and metric independent norms for displacements. Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences, Scotsdale, AZ, 13–16 September 1992.

16.

Martinez

JMR

Duffy

. On the metrics of rigid body displacements for infinite and finite bodies. ASME J Mech Des 1995; 117: 41–47.

17.

Gupta

. Measures of positional error for a rigid body. ASME J Mech Des 1997; 119: 346–349.

18.

Ge QJ. On the matrix algebra realization of the theory of biquaternions. Journal of Mechanical Design 1998, 120: 404–407.

19.

Eberharter

Ravani

. Local metrics for rigid body displacements. ASME J Mech Des 2004; 126: 805–812.

20.

Lin

Burdick

. Objective and frame invariant kinematic metric functions for rigid bodies. Int J Robot Res 2000; 19: 612–625.

21.

Ravani

Roth

. Motion synthesis using kinematic mapping. ASME J Mech Trans Auto Des 1983; 105: 460–467.

22.

Etzel K and McCarthy J. A metric for spatial displacement using biquaternions on SO(4). In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 22–28 April 1996.

23.

Larochelle PM. A polar decomposition based displacement metric for a finite region of SE(n). In: Lennarčič J and Roth B (eds.) Advances in Robot Kinematics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, pp. 33–40.

24.

Larochelle

McCarthy

. Planar motion synthesis using an approximate bi-invariant metric. ASME J Mech Des 1995; 117: 646–651.

25.

Schimmels JM and Criales LE. A Velocity Metric for Rigid-Body Planar Motion. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 15–18 August 2010.

26.

Zhao P and Ge QJ. Fine-tuning geometrically constrained planar motions. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 IDETC/CIE, 2011, Washington, DC.

27.

Huber

. Bernsteins theorem in affine space. Discrete Comput Geom 1997; 17: 137–137.

28.

Schilling

Lee

. Engineering analysis – a vector space approach, New York, NY: Wiley, 1988.

29.

Srinivasan

. Fine tuning of rational b-spline motions. ASME J Mech Des 1998; 120: 46–51.

30.

Wu J, Ge QJ, Su H-J, et al. Kinematic aquisition of geometric constraints for task centered mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 IDETC/CIE, Montreal, Canada, 2010.