To acquire a perfect vibration isolating performance in the active controlled mount system, a precise model for the actuator is required. In this study, we introduce a novel nonlinear lumped parameter model of the electromagnetic actuator for the engine’s idling or low-speed condition. The model considers not only the nonlinear characteristics caused by the reluctant force, cogging force, and magnetic saturation but also the friction between the mover and the supporting parts. The LuGre friction model is employed to describe the friction during the mover’s reciprocating motion. Then, the quasi-static actuator force of the electromagnetic actuator under constant currents is measured to identify the nonlinear parameters of the model, so is the nonstationary actuator force measured to identify the parameters of the LuGre friction model. Finally, a specific experimental scheme is proposed for validation, in which a suspended ring-shaped iron is added as the actuator’s load. This configuration limits the displacement of the mover effectively, allowing the actuator operate at a frequency of 20–50 Hz and at a peak actuator force of about 8 N, which is close to the actual working condition of the active controlled mount in the engine’s idling or low-speed condition. The results show that the proposed lumped parameter model is able to predict the dynamic characteristics of the actuator precisely. The root mean square errors of the current and actuator force are relatively 3% and 10%, respectively.
MillitzerJMayerDKrausR, et al. Experimental studies on different actuator-sensor configurations of active control systems for the reduction of noise and vibration in vehicles. SAE Int J Passeng Cars: Mech Syst2016; 9: 1100–1110.
2.
HillisAJHarrisonAJLStotenDP. A comparison of two adaptive algorithms for the control of active engine mounts. J Sound Vib2005; 286: 37–54.
3.
LiuY. Vibration and noise improvement on a balance shaft removed engine using active controlled mounting system. SAE technical paper, 2013-01-1948, 2013.
4.
FakhariVOhadiA. Robust control of automotive engine using active engine mount. J Vib Control2012; 19: 1024–1050.
5.
LeeB-HLeeC-W. Model based feed-forward control of electromagnetic type active control engine-mount system. J Sound Vib2009; 323: 574–593.
6.
Djelloul-KheddaZBoughraraKDubasF, et al. Nonlinear Analytical Prediction of Magnetic Field and Electromagnetic Performances in Switched Reluctance Machines. IEEE T Magn2017; 53: 8107311.
7.
PingJShuhuaFHeyunL, et al. Analytical magnetic field analysis and prediction of cogging force and torque of a linear and rotary permanent magnet actuator. IEEE T Magn2011; 47: 3004–3007.
8.
ZhuZQPangYHoweD, et al. Analysis of electromagnetic performance of flux-switching permanent-magnet Machines by nonlinear adaptive lumped parameter magnetic circuit model. IEEE T Magn2005; 41: 4277–4287.
9.
GaoXZOvaskaSJ.Friction compensation in servo motor systems using neural networks. In: SMCia/99 proceedings of the 1999 IEEE midnight-sun workshop on soft computing methods in industrial applications, Kuusamo, 16–18 June 1999, pp.146–151. New York: IEEE.
10.
AyalewB. Robustness to friction estimation for nonlinear position control of an electrohydraulic actuator. In: 2007 American control conference (ACC), New York, 9–13 July 2007, pp.100–105. New York: IEEE.
11.
NanWYuJWeiyangL. Robust control of a linear actuator with nonlinear dynamic friction and unknown width input dead-zone. In: IECON 2016: 42nd annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society, Florence, 23–26 October 2016, pp.5449–5454. New York: IEEE.
12.
FakhariVChoiS-BChoC-H. A new robust adaptive controller for vibration control of active engine mount subjected to large uncertainties. Smart Mater Struct2015; 24: 045044.
13.
SohnJWPaengYSChoiSB. An active mount using an electromagnetic actuator for vibration control: experimental investigation. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2009; 224: 1617–1625.
14.
Gonzalez DiazCPaulitschCGardonioP. Active damping control unit using a small scale proof mass electrodynamic actuator. J Acoust Soc Am2008; 124: 886–897.
15.
ChenXZhuZQHoweD, et al. Comparative study of alternative permanent magnet linear oscillating actuators. In: 2008 11th international conference on electrical machines and systems (ICEMS 2008), Wuhan, China, 17–20 October 2008, pp.2826–2831. New York: IEEE.
16.
ZhuZQChenXHoweD, et al. electromagnetic modeling of a novel linear oscillating actuator. IEEE T Magn2008; 44: 3855–3858.
17.
ZhuZQChenX. Analysis of an E-core interior permanent magnet linear oscillating actuator. IEEE T Magn2009; 45: 4384–4387.
18.
LiuCWangHZhangZ, et al. Research on thrust characteristics in permanent magnet linear synchronous motor based on analysis of nonlinear inductance. Proceedings of the CSEE2011; 31: 69–76.
19.
LiuCShenXWangH. Analysis and compensation of the nonlinear inductance and thrust ripple in permanent magnet linear synchronous machine. J Tsinghua Univer2010; 50: 1968–1973.
20.
ArkkioA.Unbalanced magnetic pull in cage induction motors-dynamic and static eccentricity. In: Proceedings of international conference on electrical machines (ICEM’96), Vigo, 10–12 September 1996, pp.192–197. Vigo: University of Vigo.
21.
MichonMHolehouseRCAtallahK, et al. Unbalanced magnetic pull in permanent magnet machines. In: 7th IET international conference on power electronics, machines and drives (PEMD 2014), Manchester, 8–10 April 2014, pp.1–6. Stevenage: IET.
22.
KitayamaFHirataKSakaiM. Proposal of a two movers linear oscillatory actuator for active control engine mounts. IEEE T Magn2013; 49: 2237–2240.
23.
SallierRLiuSLehmannK, et al. Modelling of electromagnetic actuators using hybrid analytical and finite-element-method. In: 2004 IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, Ajaccio, 4–7 May 2004, pp.987–992. New York: IEEE.
24.
NonakaKSuzukiT. On-line identification for cantilevered electromagnetic actuators with pull-in instability using oscillatory input stabilization. In: 2012 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration (SII 2012), Fukuoka, Japan, 16–18 December 2012, pp.804–809. New York: IEEE.
25.
HausbergFScheibleggerCPfefferP, et al. Experimental and analytical study of secondary path variations in active engine mounts. J Sound Vib2015; 340: 22–38.
26.
KitayamaFHirataKNiguchiN, et al. A new linear oscillatory actuator with variable characteristics using two sets of coils. Sensors2016; 16: 377.
27.
Canudas de WitCOlssonHAstromKJ, et al. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE T Automat Contr1995; 40: 419–425.
28.
ShaoDXuS-cDuA-m. Dynamic friction modelling and parameter identification for electromagnetic valve actuator. J Central South Univ Sci Techn Mining Metall2018; 25: 3004–3020.
29.
XiangyangZBeileiZWeiL, et al. A compound scheme on parameters identification and adaptive compensation of nonlinear friction disturbance for the aerial inertially stabilized platform. ISA T2017; 67: 293–305.
30.
WuXDZuoSGLeiL, et al. Parameter identification for a LuGre model based on steady-state tire conditions. Int J Automot Techn2011; 12: 671–677.
31.
De-PengL. Parameter identification for LuGre friction model using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, Dalian, China, 13–16 August 2006, p.4. New York: IEEE.
32.
ZhangW. Parameter identification of LuGre friction model in servo system based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. In: 26th Chinese control conference, Hunan, China, 26–31 July 2007, pp.135–139. New York: IEEE.
33.
HailongZKwokJT. Improving de-noising by coefficient de-noising and dyadic wavelet transform. In: Proceedings of 16th international conference on pattern recognition, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 11–15 August 2002, pp.273–276. New York: IEEE.
