Scaled tests and numerical simulations of rail vehicle collisions for various train sets

Abstract

This paper investigates the energy absorption and dissipation pattern in train-to-train collisions. For this purpose, simplified scaled rail vehicle models were designed based on the energy-absorbing characteristics of honeycomb-based structures under static loading, and scaled tests were performed under dynamic loading. In this study, a one-eighth-scale model of train-to-train collisions for a three-car set was tested, and the corresponding displacement–time and velocity–time curves were obtained. The extents of energy absorption and dissipation were also calculated. Also, finite element simulations were conducted to simulate one-eighth-scale train collisions for three-car, five-car and eight-car sets. The finite element numerical simulation of scaled train collisions produced results that were consistent with experiment results. The simulation results also indicated that train sets do not significantly affect energy absorption and dissipation pattern. The energy-absorbing structure at the front of a train plays a major role in the collisions. Moving cars absorb slightly more energy than stationary cars in both the scaled test and finite element simulations.

Keywords

Scaled test finite element simulation rail vehicle collision energy absorption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Evans

. Fatal train accidents on Europe's railways: 1980–2009. Accid Anal Prev 2011; 43: 391–401.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: Railway accidents. (2014, accessed 1 December 2014).

Zhang

Feng

. Principles and structure design of collision energy absorption equipment for rail cars. Rolling Stk 2001; 38: 16–19.

Wolte

. Requirements, design principles and initial results of crashworthy rail vehicles. Rolling Stk 2004; 41: 23–29.

Xue

Schmid

Smith

. Analysis of the structural characteristics of an intermediate rail vehicle and their effect on vehicle crash performance. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit 2007; 221: 339–352.

Meran

Baykasoglu

Mugan

Toprak

. Development of a design for a crash energy management system for use in a railway passenger car. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016; 230:206–219.

Tyrell

. Improvement of anti-collision performance for locomotive. Diesel Loco 2002; 3: 23–31.

Montalbán

Real

. Mechanical characterization of railway structures based on vertical stiffness analysis and railway substructure stress state. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2013; 227: 74–85.

Lei

Xiao

Luo

. Researching on car 1 crashworthiness of inter-city EMUs. Elec Dr Locomotives 2013; 1: 60–63.

10.

Dias

Pereira

. Optimization methods for crashworthiness design suing multi-body models. Comput Struct 2004; 82: 1371–1380.

11.

. Energy absorption requirement for crashworthy vehicles. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 2002; 216: 31–39.

12.

Zhao

Chu

. An enhanced multi-point dynamics methodology for collision and contact problem. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mech Engng Sci 2012; 227: 1203–1223.

13.

Neto

Ambrosio

JAC

Leal

. Composite materials in flexible multibody systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engng 2006; 195: 6860–6873.

14.

Kao GC and Bozich DJ. A scale model study of crash energy dissipating vehicle structures. Report, Wyle Laboratories, Alabama, 1968.

15.

Barley GW and Mills B. A study of impact behavior through the use of geometrically similar models. Report, University of Birmingham, UK, 1970.

16.

Lowe

WTS

Al-Hassani

Johnson

. Impact behavior of small scale model motor coaches. Proc IMechE 1972; 186: 409–419.

17.

Lu GX and Yu TX. Energy absorption of structures and materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.

18.

Jiang

Tian

Xie

Meng

. Experimental investigation into scaling laws for conical shells struck by projectiles. Int J Impact Engng 2006; 32: 1284–1298.

19.

Smith

. Scaled model test for collision between over-height truck and bridge superstructure. Int J Impact Engng 2012; 49: 31–42.

20.

Tabatabaiefar

SHR

Fatahi

Samali

. Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction. Int J Geomech 2013; 13: 409–420.

21.

Fatahi

Tabatabaiefar

SHR

. Fully nonlinear versus equivalent linear computation method for seismic analysis of midrise buildings on soft soils. Int J Geomech 2014; 14: 1–15.

22.

Buckingham

. On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev 1914; 4: 345–376.

23.

Eskandarian

Marzougui

Bedewi

. Finite element model and validation of a surrogate crash test vehicle for impacts with roadside objects. Int J Crashworth 1997; 2: 239–258.

24.

Xie

Zhou

. Research on the crashworthy structures of subway vehicles. Int J Crashworth 2014; 19: 555–566.

25.

Wang

Tian

Zhou

. High-speed axial impact of aluminum honeycomb: experiments and simulations. Composites Part B: Engng 2014; 56: 1–8.