The lateral displacement of sleepers is one of the key issues in railroads, which is caused by different factors such as the geometry of the ballast layer as well as the shape of the sleepers. Several methods have been proposed to improve the lateral resistance of sleepers on ballasted tracks. In this paper, a series of single tie push tests have been carried out to assess the performance of end-winged, middle-winged, and bumped sleepers on ballasted tracks with a variety of shoulder ballast widths and heights. Based on the experimental results, 500 mm and 150 mm were proposed as the optimum shoulder width and height, respectively. In addition, among the abovementioned sleepers, the EW_sleeper shows a significant increase in the total lateral resistance. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations were performed using PFC3D to determine the optimum size of the EW_sleeper wings. It was found that using a pair of wings measuring 14 cm in length and 13 cm in width can increase the lateral resistance compared to other alternatives.
Kish A and Samavedam G. Track buckling prevention: theory, safety concepts, and applications. USA: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, 2013.
2.
Kish A. On the fundamentals of track lateral resistance. Minneapolis, USA: American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association. 2011.
3.
Zakeri JA. Lateral resistance of railway track. In: Perpinya X (ed.) Reliability and safety in railway, InTech, 2012, pp.357–374.
4.
LiDHyslipJSussmannTet al.Railway geotechnics, Boca Raton, London, New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2002.
5.
Montalbán DomingoLReal HerraizJIZamoranoCet al.Design of a new high lateral resistance sleeper and performance comparison with conventional sleepers in a curved railway track by means of finite element models. Latin Am J Solids Struct2014; 11: 1238–1250.
6.
Tanaka H and Furukawa A. The estimation method of wheel load and lateral force using the axlebox acceleration. In: Proceedings of the 8th world congress on railway research, Seoul, Korea, 2008.
7.
Mulhall C, Balideh S, Macciotta R, et al. Large-scale testing of tie lateral resistance in two ballast materials. In: Third International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance, Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy, 2016, pp.1–12.
8.
Yan-liY. Experimental study on design parameters of longitudinal and lateral resistance of ballast bed for III-type concrete sleeper. J Railw Eng Soc2010; 10: 49–51.
9.
IndraratnaBSalimWRujikiatkamjornC. Advanced rail geotechnology – ballasted track, London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
10.
Doyle NF. Railway track design: a review of current practice, Bureau of Transport Economics, 1980.
11.
EsmaeiliMHosseiniSASSharaviM. Experimental assessment of dynamic lateral resistance of railway concrete sleeper. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng2016; 82: 40–54.
12.
Zakeri J-A, Mirfattahi B and Fakhari M. Lateral resistance of railway track with frictional sleepers. PI Civil Eng Transp 2012; 165: 151–155.
CiotlăușMKöllőG. Increasing railway stability with support elements. Special sleepers. Acta Tech Napocensis Civ Eng Archit2012; 55: 165–172.
15.
Hayano K, Koike Y, Nakamura T, et al. Effects of sleeper shape on lateral resistance of railway ballasted tracks. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Shanghai International Conference, Advances in soil dynamics and foundation engineering 2014, pp.491–499.
16.
GuerrieriMTicaliDDenaroM. High performance bi-block sleeper for improvement the performances of ballasted railway track. AASRI Procedia2012; 3: 457–462.
Le PenLPowrieW. Contribution of base, crib, and shoulder ballast to the lateral sliding resistance of railway track: a geotechnical perspective. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2011; 225: 113–128.
19.
LichtbergerB. The lateral resistance of the track (Part 2). Eur Railw Rev2007; 3-4: 68–71. .
20.
Le Pen L. Track behaviour: the importance of the sleeper to ballast interface. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, UK, 2008.
21.
KaboE. A numerical study of the lateral ballast resistance in railway tracks. Proc IMechE, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit2006; 220: 425–433.
22.
KoikeYNakamuraTHayanoKet al.Numerical method for evaluating the lateral resistance of sleepers in ballasted tracks. Soils Found2014; 54: 502–514.
23.
ZhangDHuangXZhaoY. Investigation of the shape, size, angularity and surface texture properties of coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater2012; 34: 330–336.
24.
LuMMcDowellG. The importance of modelling ballast particle shape in the discrete element method. Granular Matter2007; 9: 69.
25.
BianXHuangHTutumluerEet al.“Critical particle size” and ballast gradation studied by discrete element modeling. Transp Geotechnics2016; 6: 38–44.
26.
XuYGaoLZhangY-Ret al.Discrete element method analysis of lateral resistance of fouled ballast bed. J Central South Univ2016; 23: 2373–2381.
27.
LaryeaSBaghsorkhiMSFerellecJet al.Comparison of performance of concrete and steel sleepers using experimental and discrete element methods. Transp Geotechnics2014; 1: 225–240.
28.
KhatibiFEsmaeiliMMohammadzadehS. DEM analysis of railway track lateral resistance. Soils Found2017; 57: 587–602.
29.
Le PenLBhandariARPowrieW. Sleeper end resistance of ballasted railway tracks. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng2014; 140: 04014004.
30.
LiuJWangPLiuJ. Macro-and micro-mechanical characteristics of crushed rock aggregate subjected to direct shearing. Transp Geotechnics2015; 2: 10–19.
31.
Anochie-BoatengJKKombaJJMvelaseGM. Three-dimensional laser scanning technique to quantify aggregate and ballast shape properties. Constr Build Mater2013; 43: 389–398.
32.
FathaliMNejadFMEsmaeiliM. Influence of tire-derived aggregates on the properties of railway ballast material. J Mater Civ Eng2016; 29: 04016177.
33.
Itasca M. Particle flow code in three dimensions (PFC3D). Minneapolis, MN: Itasca Consulting Group Inc., 2008.
