Abstract
Rail anchors contribute significantly to longitudinal track resistance and rail neutral temperature management, yet their slip behavior under realistic wear and loading conditions remains poorly quantified. This study presents a laboratory program to characterize the slip strength of drive-on rail anchors as a function of anchor and rail wear, loading rate, and reaction location. A force-controlled slip test, adapted from current recommended practice, was implemented using a 245 kN actuator, a 136RE rail segment, and adjustable reaction blocks to simulate tie plate and crosstie loading while measuring rail–anchor relative displacement with high-resolution laser sensors. Results show that repeated anchor installation reduces ultimate slip strength by approximately 10%, 20%, and 45% after two, three, and ten applications, respectively, due to progressive plastic deformation of the anchor head and reduced steel-on-steel friction. Worn rail has limited influence on first installations, but worn anchors on worn rail exhibit additional strength loss. Impact loading produces slip strengths roughly 30% lower than quasi-static loading, consistent with rate-dependent stick–slip mechanics, while larger reaction gaps promote anchor rotation and walking, complicating replication and interpretation of peak strength. These findings indicate that anchor slip strength is strongly condition-dependent, and that use of a single characteristic value is inadequate for mechanistic rail stress management, longitudinal resistance modeling, and anchor design optimization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
