Performance study of an inlet in supersonic flow

Abstract

The performance characteristics of an axisymmetric inlet at its design and off-design operational conditions are experimentally investigated. The model is tested for wide ranges of free stream Mach numbers, M_∞ = 1.5–2.5, and mass flow rates. For each test, the pressure recovery, the mass flow passing through the inlet and the pressure distribution over the spike and the cowl are measured. In addition, the shock wave formed in front of the inlet is visualized. The characteristic curve of the inlet is then obtained for each free stream Mach number. As the Mach number is increased, the pressure recovery is reduced, but the maximum value of the mass flow rate grows up. Variations of the mass flow affect the surface pressure over both the front portion of the cowl and the entire surface of the spike. Further, it has changed both pressure and Mach number at the end of the diffuser, which would consequently affect the performance of the propulsion system. In addition, contrary to the internal boundary layer, the external one far from the cowl lip has been found to be almost independent of the inlet mass flow rate for a constant free stream Mach number.

Keywords

Supersonic inlet Mach number effect performance at off-design conditions boundary layer influence of the mass flow rate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Seddon

Goldsmith

. Intake aerodynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1999, pp.20–76.

Mahoney

. Inlets for supersonic missiles. Washington, D.C: AIAA Press, 1990, pp.34–100.

Goldsmith

Seddon

. Practical intake aerodynamic design. Collins, London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993, pp.52–127.

Moeckel

Connors

Schroeder

. Investigation of shock diffusers at Mach number 1.85 I: projecting single-shock cones. Hampton, VA: NACA, report no. NACA RM E6K27, 1947.

Esenwein

Valerino

. Force and pressure characteristics for a series of nose inlets at Mach numbers from 1.59 to 1.99. Hampton, VA: NACA, report no. NACA RM E50J26, 1951.

Beke

Allen

. Force and pressure-recovery characteristics of a conical-type nose inlet operating at Mach numbers of 1.6 to 2.0 and at angles of attack to 9 degrees. Hampton, VA: NACA, report no. NACA RM E52I30, 1952.

Zha

Smith

Schwabacher

. High-performance supersonic missile inlet design using automated optimization. J Aircr 1997; 34(6): 697–705.

Xiong C, Sheng ZC, Ya Z, et al. Influence of cowl leading edge on inlet performance of ramjet assisted-range projectiles. In: Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint propulsion conference and exhibit, Tucson Convention Center, Tucson, Arizona, 10–13 July 2005. Reston, VA: AIAA, paper no. AIAA 2005–3642.

Xiong C, Sheng ZC, Ya Z, et al. Numerical simulation of ramjet inlet with different cowl leading edge. In: Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 6–9 June 2005. Reston, VA: AIAA, paper no. AIAA 2005-5288.

10.

Nair

Kumar

Saxena

. Computational analysis of inlet aerodynamics for a hypersonic research vehicle. J Propul Power 2005; 21(2): 286–291.

11.

Liang

J-H

Fan

X-Q

Wang

. Performance enhancement of three-dimensional hypersonic inlet with sidewall compression. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2008; 222: 1211–1220.

12.

Chang

Bao

FanY . Performance optimization of hypersonic inlets with pulse periodic energy addition. Proc IMechE Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2009; 223: 691–699.

13.

Kim

Song

Lim

. A numerical analysis on three-dimensional flow field in a supersonic bump inlet. Reston, VA: AIAA, paper no. 2007-689, January 2007.

14.

Herrmann

Triesch

Gülhan

. Experimental study of chin intakes for airbreathing missiles with high agility. J Propul Power 2008; 24(2): 236–244.

15.

Soltani MR, Farahani M, Sanaei M, et al. Experimental investigation of combustion chamber pressure effects on performance of an axisymmetric supersonic inlet. In: Proceedings of the AERO 2009 Conference, The 8th Iranian Aerospace Society Conference, 17–19 February 2009 Shahinshar, Iran.

16.

Soltani MR, Farahani M, Kazemi J, et al. Experimental investigation of effects of angle of attack on pressure distribution of an axisymmetric supersonic inlet. In: 17th. Annual (International) conference on mechanical engineering-ISME 2009, May 2009, University of Tehran, Iran.

17.

Soltani

Farahani

Sepahi Younsi

. Performance improvement of a supersonic external compression inlet by heat source addition. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2008; 40(51): 267–274.

18.

Soltani

Farahani

Asgari Kaji

. An experimental study of buzz instability in an axisymmetric supersonic inlet. Sci Iranica Trans B 2011; 18(2): 241–249.

19.

Soltani

Farahani

. Experimental investigation of flow instability in a supersonic inlet. New York: ASME, paper no. ESDA2010-24858, 2010.

20.

Pope A and Goin KL. High-speed wind tunnel testing. New York, NY: John Willey, 1965, pp.211–302.

21.

Cebeci T. Three dimensional boundary layer on missiles. In: Hemsch MJ and Nielsen JD (eds). Tactical missile aerodynamics. Progress Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 104, Washington, DC: AIAA, 1986, pp.723–777.

22.

Soltani MR, Taiebi-Rahni M, Farahani M, et al. Flow measurements around a long axisymmetric body with varying cross section. Reston, VA: AIAA, paper no. AIAA paper-05-50, 2005.

23.

Anderson JD. Modern compressible flow with historical perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.

24.

Beckwith TG, Maraugoni RD and Lienhard VJH. Mechanical measurements, 5th ed. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993, pp.45–115.

25.

Trapier S, Duveau P and Deck S. Experimental study of supersonic inlet buzz. AIAA J 2006; 44(10): 2354–2365.